European Commission - Specific RTD programme in the field of Information Technologies

SPECIFIC

INFORMATION

DOCUMENT

FUSE

Guide for Proposers

Technologies for Components and Subsystems (TCS)

FIRST USERS ACTION

"Broadening the use of technologies"

Edition September 1997

updated for the March 1998 Call


FUSE Application Experiments:

Guide for proposers

(This is a revised edition for the FUSE call for continuous submission open from September 15th 1997. Those familiar with previous editions will find the possibility to submit proposals as Application Experiments focused and re-submissions restricted. This edition further describes how to benefit from the FUSE portfolio through a replication.)

CONTENTS

1 This guide for proposers
2 Rationale for FUSE
3 How the goal of FUSE will be achieved
4 FUSE calls for Application Experiments and organisation of Replication Experiments
5 Who can take part?
in an AE?
in a RE?
6 The content of an AE or RE
7 Eligible costs and funding model of an AE
8 Help for replicating companies
9 Submitting a proposal for an AE
9.1 Format for AE proposals
9.2 Conformance and evaluation criteria and selection process for AEs
9.3 How to submit an AE
10 Procedures for a RE
11 Further Information
12 Appendices
Appendix I Forms to be used for a submission for an AE
Appendix II List of TTNs under existing FUSE contract
Appendix III Codes
Appendix IV General Information on Eligibility for Participation
Appendix V Checklist for FUSE AE proposals
Appendix VI Demonstrator contents

Image

This guide for proposers

The European Commission (EC) implements a hierarchy of programmes called the Framework-, Specific- and Workprogrammes. Calls are opened for specific tasks in the Workprogrammes.

The First Users Action(FUSE) is part of the Fourth Framework Programme (1994-1998) and is identified in the 1998 Work Programme of the Information Technologies Specific Programme in task 2.26 as follows:

Stimulating industrial enterprises to incorporate electronic technologies into their products in the context of an action for first users.

This specific information document is intended to aid organisations which are planning to respond to the Call published on 17th March 1998 closing on 16th June 1998 for FUSE by submitting an Application Experiment or who are interested in benefiting from the FUSE portfolio through a replication.

In case you are interested to submit, please contact for further advice and additional documentation one of the addresses in the Appendix II. Please note that some of the necessary documentation will be available from 15th December onwards

2. Rationale for FUSE

In recent years, there has been a steep increase in the utilisation of microelectronics in many industry sectors. Despite this, the majority of European enterprises, especially small and medium enterprises (SMEs), have not yet taken full advantage of existing microelectronics technologies to become more competitive and to achieve a wider penetration of their home and export markets.

Against this background, the European Commission (EC) launched FUSE. FUSE is a technology transfer project and wants to disseminate best practice in the first use of microelectronics. FUSE is designed as an action for companies facing barriers related to the use of microelectronics.

3. How the goal of FUSE will be achieved

FUSE utilises the concept of a funded Application Experiment (AE) and of a Replication Exercise (RE) as instruments to enable the first use of microelectronics technologies. To help the companies a network of technology transfer nodes (TTNs) is installed.

During the AE, the enterprise, termed First User (FU), will use new technologies to conduct the specification, design, prototype, manufacture and testing of a component or system which is relevant to the improvement of its manufactured products or manufacturing processes. The AE is conducted by the FU in collaboration with subcontractors to ensure that sufficient knowledge is transferred to the enterprise and a sustained increment in its technological capabilities is achieved. The AE will be monitored by a TTN.

FUSE aims to capture and widely disseminate the essentials of the AE to encourage other enterprises to adopt electronic technologies. Replication by other enterprises will create a multiplication effect that will result in a wider take-up of new technologies in all regions of Europe. Therefore, the funded enterprises are contractually obliged to provide information on best practice in the first use of these technologies. Of particular importance are the enterprises' experiences in overcoming the barriers to the adoption of the new technologies and economic impact. This comprehensive dissemination document is held in the FUSE database, and available to interested enterprises.

Flyers will be produced to provide industrial enterprises with a brief description of the demonstrators and their results. These will be used for direct contact with companies.

The FUSE portfolio of the demonstrators is a corner stone of the project. The portfolio is utilised by a network of Technology Transfer Nodes (TTNs) to achieve a European-wide take-up of microelectronics technologies.

The portfolio can be used by companies who want to learn from experience of other FUs. A company using the information provided via the demonstrators is said to replicate AEs. To companies who wish to do so the TTNs provide guidance during proactive work and training. Companies who will share their replication experiences will have their reporting costs covered. These companies are said to execute Replication Exercises (RE).

The TTNs visit companies in their proactive work and they convince enterprises of the technical and economic benefits of using microelectronics technologies. The TTN demonstrates to a company how to overcome the problems associated with the adoption of new microelectronics technologies. They help the company choose the appropriate technology from the wide range of technologies including microprocessors, PCBs, ASICs, MCMs and Microsystems and help companies with the choice and interfacing to subcontracted suppliers.

The TTNs therefore advise the companies whether an AE submission could be successful or could propose companies to do a RE. In all cases the companies can be assisted by a TTN via training activities using the FUSE demonstrators. These training activities focus on the experiences and advice given by former FUs.

The demonstrator power of the AEs, coupled with the proactive work and dissemination activities of the TTNs, will allow FUSE to reach and convince the wider audience of European enterprises who can benefit from the utilisation of microelectronics.

4. FUSE calls for Application Experiments and organisation of Replication Experiments

Selective FUSE AE calls will be issued by the European Commission to provide targeted demonstrators throughout the duration of the FUSE project.

Industrial enterprises who have successfully responded to the FUSE calls will have to choose a TTN from the list in Appendix II. The chosen TTN will, upon accept, guide this AE and negotiate a contract. Each AE is governed by an Associated Contract to be concluded between a single First User organisation and the TTN.

The European dimension, a requirement for an ESPRIT project, is covered by the TTNs through dissemination of the results to organisations throughout Europe.

The First User may subcontract work to organisations where necessary and appropriate and as agreed by the EC.

Companies who are interested in training on the portfolio should contact one of the TTNs.

Companies wanting to report on their replication experiences (RE) should contact a TTN. TTNs organise continuous evaluations on batches of such small proposals following lean procedures. It is evaluated whether the proposed reporting will be of added value to the demonstrators. Upon approval of the EC the enterprise will receive a subcontract from a TTN.

5. Who can take part?

Any company that wants to receive training on the portfolio can take part in the training activities organised by the TTNs. To take part in an AE or RE, an organisation must be eligible to participate in the IT Specific Programme as described in Appendix IV.

Although this Action is oriented towards SMEs, it is not exclusively reserved for SMEs. Submissions from larger companies are also eligible provided they fulfil the conditions laid down below.

FUSE is aimed at a broad spectrum of industrial sectors. Companies using microelectronics for the first time, as well as companies already employing microelectronics, are both targeted. Enterprises who are active in areas other than mainstream electrical and electronic engineering, and industrial manufacturing process control systems are encouraged to participate, particularly enterprises with no experience in the use of electronic technologies. However, the proposers should inform themselves on the specific focus of each call.

Who can take part in an AE?

FUSE seeks demonstrators from companies at all steps of the technology ladder and in the whole spectrum of industry sectors. The demonstrators will have to be at the appropriate technology levels for various combinations of application area and industry sector. The call will be restricted to AE which can provide demonstrators that cover not yet existing examples in the FUSE portfolio. Three months before the closing of the call an addition to this document on the focus of the call will be issued specifying which holes are identified and consequently which demonstrators are targeted as a complement to the existing portfolio. This document can be obtained from the TTNs or the EC FUSE secretariat.

Organisations that want to propose should meet the three criteria put on conformance with the FUSE project: They must have an existing manufactured product on the market; propose to apply existing microelectronics technologies either to the product itself or to their manufacturing process and they must qualify as an industrial First User.

To the first criteria we can say that the proposer should give evidence that they manufacture a product which is already on the market. For an innovation of the manufacturing process the complete spectrum of products produced will be considered.

The requirement to use an existing microelectronics technology excludes research and development of the technology. What is important is that the technology to be used represents a significant advance for the enterprise both in experience gained and in the improved competitiveness.

Companies qualify as a First User if they will apply an existing technology for the first time. They could e.g. propose to integrate a microcontroller, ASIC or microsystem into their products or production line, or design say mixed-signal components instead of purely digital or purely analogue ones if they have not worked with these technologies before.

Who can take part in a RE?

The company should meet the requirements for participation in an AE and demonstrate that they will replicate a (set of) demonstrator(s).

6. The content of an AE or RE

An AE or RE will deal with the innovation of an existing product through microelectronics. The full cycle of design, manufacturing and testing of a prototype device in the new technology should be covered.

The work in an AE is restricted to the incremental effort needed to work with the new technology. Thus only the part of the system innovation related to microelectronics will be funded.

Among the technologies which could be proposed are PCBs (printed circuit board), FPGAs (field programmable gate array), ASICs (application specific integrated circuit), MCMs (multi-chip module), hybrid or monolithically integrated Microsystems.

A commitment to participate to dissemination activities executed by the TTNs should form part of the proposal.

The typical duration of an AE or RE is expected to be of the order of one year. The maximum acceptable duration will be 18 months.

7. Eligible costs and funding model of an AE

100% of the incremental marginal costs of the First User associated with the execution of the Application Experiment can be charged under the agreed contract. An incremental marginal cost in this context is defined to be the actual expenditure which a contractor incurs directly or through subcontracts in the execution of the task and which is solely attributable to the execution of the task. A template associated contract can be obtained from the TTNs.

Allowable costs for an AE include all marginal costs needed to perform the experiment including design, manufacture and test of a prototype component as appropriate. Furthermore it could include training costs and costs of participation to dissemination events organised by the FUSE TTNs. Hardware and software (rent or license fees) are allowable on a pro-rata basis. Pro-rata means calculating a time and usage percentage, taking the hardware and software lifetime compared with the project duration and the ratio of the usage by the AE and other users.
Marketing or commercial activities, amongst which EMC testing not influencing the design are non eligible.

The costs of an AE will depend on the complexity of the technologies being used.

The Commission makes routine checks on the financial status of prospective project partners. Depending on the result of these checks, measures to safeguard public interest may be deemed appropriate in some cases, which would be discussed with the participants prior to the contract's signature.

8. Help for replicating companies

All companies wanting to learn from other FUs will be guided by the TTNs. They will have free access to information in the portfolio on how to implement microelectronics for the first time. This information includes work plans, profile of necessary subcontractors, advice on best practice from the FU and the economic impact possible. In Appendix VI the information addressed by the demonstrators is given.

In addition training activities on best practice will be organised by the TTNs based on the demonstrators. These workshops are free of charge.

For a RE the costs to report on the replication experiences is covered up to 2 kECU.

9. Submitting a proposal for an AE

9.1 Format for AE Proposals

A submission for an AE should contain a plan of the work. The plan consists of two parts.

Part 1 consists of administrative and financial information on the proposer. It specifies their level of previous involvement in electronics technologies. It also includes details of anticipated costs. Appropriate forms are included in Appendix I.

Part 2 contains a description of the work and should be as concise as possible, organised according to the following headings:

9.2 Conformance and evaluation criteria and selection process for AE

The measure of success for a participating First User will be both the degree to which the experiment provides a more competitive prototype product and the degree to which the enterprise acquires the know-how to access and use the new technologies and to replicate the exercise in the future. Participants should be able to demonstrate after the experiment what they have learnt from the experience.

From the global perspective of FUSE the measure of success will be the increase in the number of enterprises using these new technologies, possibly via learning from the experiences of other First Users and their increase in competitiveness through the use of new technologies in their products.

It is important that the Application Experiment represents a significant advance both in the use of technology and experience for the participating enterprise. It must be viewed against the current situation of the enterprise, and should not be a minor incremental advance in technology for them nor should it be such a major step that the risks involved are too high or the potential for replication small.

It is expected that the First User should learn to execute the technical management of the experiment and to assess the technical and economic benefits of different potential solutions. This in order to enable them to execute a subsequent innovation on their own.

The following conformance criteria will be applied when judging submissions to carry out an Application Experiment:

During the selection process the added value of the AE to the FUSE portfolio will be considered. A necessary condition to pass the selection process is to score high for replication value. Each submission will be evaluated by a panel of international experts. The experts are bound by a confidentiality agreement. The evaluation will have due regards to the criteria here and will be carried out under the responsibility of the Commission. The results of the evaluation and selection will be communicated to the proposing FU. The TTNs will receive the results of successful ones and the co-ordinates of non-successful proposers.
The co-ordinates of successful proposers may also be communicated to the sister project Europractice Basic Services.

Should a submission of the same company fail to be selected on two occasions, further submissions of the same AE will not be evaluated.

9.3 How to submit an AE

Submissions for the AE should be made in response to a Call for proposals which explicitly specifies task 2.26.

All proposals submitted before 15 March, 1998 will be evaluated during the month of April, 1998.

In addition to the information provided on the forms in Appendix I, each organisation should provide a letter authorising participation in the proposal (duly signed original). Note that all boxes have to be filled in.

Please note that if the AE will be funded all information agreed to become public is to be provided in English for dissemination purposes.

One original and six copies of each proposal should be sent by courier or postal service or delivered by hand to:

IT Programme Office

Boulevard du Souverain, 191-197

B-1160 Brussels

Belgium

Please do not send submissions by fax. Do not announce by fax or telephone that submissions are in the mail. Such communications only hinder the Commission staff in their work of handling proposals.

You should clearly mark on the parcel and on the front sheet:

"Confidential: FUSE AE submission."

10. Procedures for a RE

Information on how to participate in the training or in REs can be obtained from the TTNs.

For a RE a workplan consisting of a subset of the work plan items in the AE and a commitment to capture experiences should be produced. The link to existing AE should be explained and the added value to the portfolio of a description of the replication experiences should be demonstrated.

11. Further information

Should you have any specific questions on FUSE, please address them to any of the TTNs listed in Appendix II. In case the TTN cannot help, you can address them to the FUSE secretariat preferably by fax so that they can be distributed to the appropriate EC project officer:

EC FUSE secretariat : tel.: +32.2.295.90.75 fax: +32.2.296.83.88

Appendices

Appendix 1 - Forms to be used in the preparation of a Submission for an Application Experiment

Form 1: Proposal Administrative Summary for an Application Experiment

Task Name: Esprit - FUSE

Task: 2.26

Action type: AE

Duration in months:

Proposal Title:
Total Costs: Total Funding: Total Person Years:
Legal name and address of proposing organisation
Organisation Name: Reg (VAT) number
Department Name (if applicable):
Street Name: Street No:
Post Code: City: Country :
Project leader within organisation
First Name: Family Name:
International Telephone: International Fax:
E-mail:
Organisation details
Number of employees: Is the participant an SME (Y/N)? (1)

(1) Small/medium sized enterprise. An enterprises is defined as an SME if it:

  • has no more than 250 employees
  • has an annual turnover of not more than 40 million ECUs
  • is no more than one quarter owned by one or more organisations that does not satisfy the first two criteria, unless it is a financial investor such as a bank or venture capitalist.


Additional information on First User
Please indicate your organisation's current experience of electronic systems, and the technology proposed (tick those boxes which apply)

Current Technology

Proposed Technology

PCBs




FPGA




Digital ASICs




Analogue ASICs




Mixed-signal ASICs




MCMs




Microsystem

Microcontroller






Other:__________________



Total number of employees in the organisation
The number of engineers involved in electronic systems
Proposed technologies
Name of the technology proposed to be used

Relevant industrial sector code (1)
Preferred TTN to conclude an Associated Contract with


Subcontractors
Company name :

Percentage of budget :
Company name :

Percentage of budget :


ANTICIPATED INCREMENTAL MARGINAL COSTS OF FIRST USER AND THEIR SUBCONTRACTORS

Description of incremental marginal costs

Costs charged to EC

(KECU)

Labour by first user (justifiable, additional, please specify)(1)(2)

Effort in persondays

Task 1: Technical management

Task 2: Training

Task 3: Specification

Task 4: Design

Task 5: Evaluation

Other (please specify)

Subcontracts(2)

Effort in persondays

Training costs to be paid to subcontractor [Name]

Design assistance by subcontractor [Name]

Production costs by foundry [Name]

Other (please specify) [Name]

Full Costs

Licence fees (3)

Purchase of software (3)

Purchase of hardware (3)

Others (please specify)

Total anticipated incremental marginal costs

(1) General company overheads are not allowable.

(2))Documentary evidence of costs and effort expended will be required.

(3)Payable to third parties, costs on a pro-rata basis


Image



Acknowledgement of receipt

European Commission
Directorate General III: Industry
RTD: Information Technologies

Brussels, ....................................

Please write the name and address to
which the acknowledgement of receipt
should be sent in the box

NAME/ADDRESS






VERY IMPORTANT

We may ask the representatives of proposers to attend meetings and/or provide further information at any time after the closing date and especially in the first two months after this date. In your own interest please ensure that representatives are available at short notice during this period.

Subject: Acknowledgement of receipt of Submission (orig. + 6 copies)
Ref.: ESPRIT contiunous submission
Title of Proposal:

Proposal Type: (AE) FUSE Application Experiment

To be completed by the ESPRIT operation office:

We acknowledge receipt of your FUSE proposal mentioned above on: ...../...../......

Your proposal is registered under Nr: ........................
(Please refer to this proposal number in future correspondence)

Yours sincerely,



Esprit Evaluation Manager



Image





Appendix II - List of TTNs

List of TTNs

This list was valid on 15th September 1997 and may be updated. You are advised to contact the EC FUSE Secretariat or any TTN to acquire the most up-to-date version.

Denmark

Mr Eskild Jensen
DELTA
Venlighedsvej 4
DK-2970 Hørsholm
Tel: +45 42 867722
Fax: +45 42 865898
e-mail: ej@delta.dk

France

Mr Francois Baillieu
CCIP Groupe ESIEE Paris
Cité Descartes
2 Boulevard Blaise Pascal
F-93162 Noisy-Le-Grand
Tel: +33 145 92 67 10
Fax: +33 145 92 67 03
e-mail: TTN-IDF.PIC@BART.ESIEE.fr
http://www.esiee.fr

Germany

Mr Claus Dittrich
GEMAC mbH
Matthesstraße 53
D-09113 Chemnitz
Tel: +49 371 3377 104
Fax: +49 371 3377 272
e-mail: 100144.2036@compuserve.com
e-mail:gemac.chemnitz@t-online.de

Italy

Mr Fabrizio Innocenti
CESVIT - Centro di Microelettronica
Via del Ferrone 5
I-50124 Firenze
Tel: +39 55 429 4321
Fax: +39 55 706 218
e-mail: innocenti@cesvit.it

Mr Lino Fiorentino
Consorzio Roma Ricerche
Via Orazio Raimondo 8
I-00173 Roma
Tel: +39 6 723 46 10
Fax: +39 6 723 43 05
e-mail: ttn@roma.ccr.it

Mr Mario Sartori
COREP
Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24
I-10129 Torino
Tel: +39 11 56 44 046
Fax: +39 11 56 45 126
e-mail: ni_ttn@ccmserv.polito.it

Spain

Mr Juan Mangas
COTEC
C/ Marques de Urquijo 26, 1· C, Izq.
E-28008 Madrid
Tel: +34 1 542 01 86
Fax: +34 1 559 36 74
e-mail: juanjo.mangas@cotec.es

The United Kingdom

Mr Richard Fairbank
Bolton Institute of Higher Education
Deane Road
UK-Bolton BL3 5AB
Tel: +44 1204 903466
Fax: +44 1204 370916
e-mail: ttn@Bolton.ac.uk

Mr Mohamed Wahab
University of Glamorgan
Mid Glamorgan
UK-Pontypridd CF37 1DL
Tel: +44 1443 482542
Fax: +44 1443 482541
e-mail: mawahab@glamorgan.ac.uk

Appendix III - Codes

List of codes

INDUSTRIAL SECTORS

Identify the relevant industrial sector of the organisation in the proposal and include the corresponding code in the appropriate space on Form 2

Business

Code

Finance and insurance

FN

Business, legal and management consultancy, holdings

BC

Publishing, printing and reproduction of recorded media

PP

Real estate activities

RE

Renting and leasing

RL

Lodging and restaurants

LR

Technical testing and analysis

TA

Wholesale and retail trade, repair of goods

WR

Community activities

Community service activities

CS

Education

ED

Energy production and distribution, gas & water supply

EN

Health and social work

HS

Recreational, cultural and sporting activities

RC

Recycling

CY

Post and telecommunications

PT

Transportation services

TS

Engineering

Electrical engineering & related technical consultancy

EE

Mechanical engineering & related technical consultancy

ME

IT activities

Audiovisual consumer electronics

IA

Electronic components & subsystems

IC

- semiconductors

IC1

- controllers

IC2

- PCBs

IC3

Electronic engineering & related technical consultancy

IE

Industrial process control systems

IP

- chemical

IP1

- mechanical

IP2

- agricultural

IP3

- food industries

IP4

Office machinery and computers

IM

- computers

IM1

- graphics & CAD/CAM

IM2

- peripherals

IM3

Software consultancy & supply, data processing & related services

IS

Telecom products

IT

- telephones

IT1

- broadcasting

IT2

- data/FAX

IT3

- satellites

IT4

Manufacturing

Aircraft and spacecraft

AS

Metals and alloys

MA

Chemical products

CP

Fabricated metal products, except machinery and equipment

FM

Food products and beverages

FB

Furniture

FV

Leather and leather products

LL

Machinery, electrical and optical equipment

EQ

- industrial fabrication equipment

EQ1

- agricultural equipment

EQ2

- industrial chemical equipment

EQ3

- tools

EQ4

- small house & home products

EQ5

Medical, precision and optical instruments

IN

- medical

IN1

- optical

IN2

- precision

IN3

Non-metallic mineral products

MP

Pharmaceuticals, medicinal chemicals and botanical products

PH

Pulp, paper and paper products

PA

Rubber and plastic products

RU

Textile and textile products

TE

Vehicles for land transportation

VL

Vehicles for sea transportation

VS

Wood and wood products

WW

Other activities

Agriculture and forestry

AF

Construction and building

CB

Fishing

FI

Mining and quarrying

MQ

Code not given

NN

Appendix IV - General Information on Eligibility for Participation

WHO CAN PARTICIPATE ?

From EU member states

The programme is open to all legal entities - i.e. people and organisations - established and carrying out RTD activities in the Member States of the European Union (industrial firms both large and small enterprises aimed at bringing products and services to the market - universities, higher education institutes, research organisations, etc.), and to the Joint Research Centre of the EC.

From associated and financially contributing states

Participation in this programme, with financial contribution from the EU, is open to any legal entity established or carrying out RTD activities in a third country associated with and contributing financially to the implementation of this Programme.

These are currently: Iceland, Israel, Liechtenstein and Norway.

From other European countries, Australia, Canada, South Africa and the USA

Legal entities established and carrying out RTD activities in other European countries or in countries who have concluded an S&T; agreement with the EU (not financially contributing as described above) may participate in the programme on condition that:

These states are at printing date: Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Georgia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Moldavia, Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Turkey and Ukraine, for which financial support by the EU, would in the case of acceptance of the proposal, normally be provided from funds other than the Esprit budget (an explicit request for such funding has to accompany the proposal).

Swiss, Australian, Canadian, South African and US organisations may participate under the above conditions, but without funding from the EC.

Organisations from other states

Legal entities established in states other than above listed, may participate on condition that:

Organisations from Japan, Korea, New Zealand and Taiwan are not eligible for funding from the EU.

For organisations from other countries, financial support by the EU may be provided from funds other than the Esprit budget. An explicit request for such funding has to accompany the proposal.

International organisations

International Organisations may participate on condition that:

Financial support from the Esprit Programme may be provided to international organisations situated in Europe on a case by case basis. An explicit request for such funding has to accompany the proposal.

Appendix V - Checklist for FUSE AE proposals

  1. Does the proposal describe an improvement to an existing product or production line?
  2. Does the proposal prove that it is an existing product in production and not merely a prototype?
  3. Does the proposal provide evidence of an economic advantage at the product level (market survey of profitability of the investment)?
  4. Does the proposal outline improved sales based on the proposed development?
  5. Is it clear who will manufacture the component and/or product?
  6. Has the company qualified itself as a First User of the chosen technology?
  7. Is it clear from the proposal that the company is overcoming barriers to the use of microelectronics through its participation in FUSE?
  8. Are several technical approaches - technology, software and hardware, tools and methods - explored and is the chosen approach rationalised?
  9. Does the proposal justify the choice of each subcontractor?
  10. Is there any risk assessment?
  11. . Are company personnel clearly involved in, and improving, their decision making and technical management?
  12. Is it clear in the proposal how involved the company will be in the technical work and does it demonstrate an increment in their capability?
  13. Is there a clear role for the subcontractors in the knowledge transfer process (training on options, advice)?
  14. Is the company planning to assess its performance and incremental improvement?
  15. Does the proposal contain an identification of the information that will not be public?
  16. Does the proposal make it clear how widely applicable the knowledge acquired is for other non-participating companies?
  17. Is the work properly costed including subcontract or service requirements?
  18. Is the overall cost in line with FUSE?
  19. Is the time plan realistic and in line with the company's business plans?
  20. Will the company be able to undertake similar future projects without support?
  21. Has the proposal been submitted before, but not more than once, and is it now improved with respect to previous criticisms?
  22. Is the proposal repeating an already supported application experiment?
  23. Does the proposal address the focus of the call?
  24. Is the replicability of the proposal discussed?
  25. Is the added value of the proposal to the portfolio demonstrated?

Appendix VI - Demonstrator contents

The demonstrator document contains the following topics:

1. Abstract

2. Company name and address

3. Company size

4. Company business description

5. Expertise and experience of the company and staff allocated to the project

6. Company markets and competitive position at the start of the AE

7. Product to be improved and its industrial sectors

8. Description of the product improvements

9. Choices and rationale for the selected technologies and methodologies

10. Economic impact and improvement in competitive position

11. Barriers perceived by the company in the first use of the AE technology

12. Steps taken to overcome barriers and arrive at an improved product

13. Workplan and its rationale

14. Knowledge and experience acquired

15. Lessons learned

16. Target audience for dissemination

17. Subcontractor information

18. Future: industrialisation and internal replication