Skip to main content
European Commission logo print header

Article Category

News
Content archived on 2023-03-02

Article available in the following languages:

JRC report weighs up economic benefits of GM crops

Growing genetically modified (GM) crops can bring farmers economic benefits. But these are made from savings on herbicides, pesticides and machinery, not from higher yields, as was previously thought, according to a new study by the European Commission's Joint Research Centre ...

Growing genetically modified (GM) crops can bring farmers economic benefits. But these are made from savings on herbicides, pesticides and machinery, not from higher yields, as was previously thought, according to a new study by the European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) on the economic impact of GM crops worldwide. It is now more than 10 years since the first GM crops were introduced into agriculture. In that time, GM crops of cotton, maize, rapeseed and soybean have quickly been taken up in many areas of the world. It is estimated that the number of GM crops sown has gone from 2.8 million hectares in 1996 to 90 million hectares inn 2005. Overall, more than 20 countries worldwide grow GM crops, of which 7 are high-income economies, and 14 are developing countries. Currently Spain is the only country in the EU farming a GM crop for commercial purposes at a significant rate. The report was carried out by the JRC's Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS) within the framework of 'Sustainable Introduction of GMOs into European Agriculture (SIGMEA) - a project funded by the Sixth Framework Programme (FP6). Weighing up the economic impacts, the report finds that for some GM crops, the difference between their yield and that of conventional crops is almost negligible. A 2000 study of Delaware farmers in the US reported only a small increase in the crop yield of herbicide tolerance (Ht) soybean compared to traditional crops. In another sample, farmers growing Ht soybean reported that they spent on average €13 per hectare more on seeds than before. However, the yield of some other GM crops, like the pest resistant cotton (Bt), has been much higher than non-GM crops. The study refers to reports from China, India, Argentina and South Africa of yields from Bt cotton crops which are anything between 10% and 87% higher than conventional cotton. In Spain, farmers growing Bt maize reported that the average yield over three seasons was just under 5% higher than that from traditional crops. Whether yields are higher or not, GM farmers have found that they have made money elsewhere thanks to the introduction of these crops. In the US, farmers of the HT soybean reported net savings in weed control, tillage, labour and machinery costs, which outweigh the higher seed costs and small yield gain. Similarly, Bt cotton farmers in China said they were using five times less insecticide per hectare, while in India, farmers estimated that less use of pesticide corresponded to savings of €25 per hectare. However, farmers in the US found that the money gained from using less pesticide was offset by the high price of GM seeds. In addition to looking at the economic benefits of GM crops, the report also forecasts the benefits should more EU countries decide to grow such crops. It estimates that if 75% of French rapeseed farmers grew the GM variant, they would save €24 million in weeding costs per season. Similar benefits were calculated in the UK. Assuming that all sugarbeet growers in the UK grew the herbicide resistant crop, the report estimates average total savings of €33.5 million a year. Finally, the report throws light on the potential costs that farmers may incur in order to adhere to the EU guidelines on co-existence - the separation of organic, traditional and GM crops. The main measures considered are the cleaning of harvesting machinery, the introduction of isolation distances between GM and ordinary crops, and the planting of buffer strips of ordinary crops around GM plots. Using empirical evidence, the authors of the report estimate that these measures would increase a GM maize farmer's costs by €84 per hectare. Farmers would also have to pay a fixed levy per hectare to cover the possible economic losses of non-GM farmers. These measures could possibly weigh against GM varieties when farmers are considering whether to cultivate them, concludes the report.