This site has been archived on
skip to page content
Sixth Framework Programme
Legal Notice
 
The 'FP6 step by step' section is a structured walk- through of what FP6 participation entails.
 You are here: Home Page > Preparing to make a proposal > Consortium building
Site overview
What's new in FP6?
Finding your research theme
Preparing to make a proposal
The proposal
What happens after submission
Managing a project

Go to the Sixth Framework Programme Service on CORDIS


Consortium building

Reference documents and sites

The core research work of the Framework Programmes is undertaken by projects that are structured as a collaboration between a group of partners who share tasks and responsibilities. This means that finding the right partners and setting up the collaboration or consortium is a key preparatory task. Partners need to be complementary to each other, but they must share an interest in the common problem that they are going to tackle in their research. Moreover, the consortium has to establish management structures and procedures adapted to the type and the complexity of the project. This will also be an important criterion in the evaluation of proposals.

Under FP6 all participants forming the consortium are entering into a contract with the Commission. Before this contract can be signed the consortium agreement should be in place. See the consortium checklist for information on this.

 Partner sources

design feature

It is best if the partners in a project are well known to each other and have worked together previously. However, this is not always possible, especially when seeking complementary skills and expertise. Your profile can be published on the CORDIS Partners service, which will advertise the fact that you are looking for a partner. Searches can be made of the existing profiles to see if there is someone already looking for your type of organisation for their project, or is willing to join your project. It is also possible to search for previous Framework Programme projects to see who are the experienced actors. Other sources are your local National Contact Point (NCP) for the subject area you are interested in, your local Innovation Relay Centre (IRC) or Euro Info Centre (EIC). Another possibility is to look on CORDIS at the Expressions of Interest database or at the database of projects funded by previous Framework Programmes. The Commission often runs information days for specific parts of the Framework Programme and these can introduce you to partners among the delegates as well as being useful in their own right.

 Diversity and complementarity

design feature

One of Europe’s greatest assets is its rich cultural diversity. Projects that bring together researchers from very different parts of Europe can take advantage of the different perspectives and the range of skills that are potentially available. In addition, partners who are concerned with complementary aspects of the research will make a stronger consortium than partners who are too similar and may even find themselves competing. Diversity up and down the supply chain will help to ensure that the necessary enabling technologies are available and that the results of the research are taken forward into application. This last aspect is a very important factor in demonstrating a consortium that can do more than produce good science. By selecting partners from research and industry it will help to bridge the gap between these cultures and smooth the way from research to exploitation. Partners from different research or industry sectors might further help to broaden the project and achieve critical mass.

At the same time, cultural differences can also be an obstacle if partners fail to understand them and allow for them. Good communication, clear agreement, and careful joint planning are essential if diverse partners are to work together in a coordinated way. No single culture is the ‘right’ one and ways have to be found to accommodate diversity and to work with it to achieve the benefits.

Other than the minimum number of transnational partners there is no set prescription for what makes a good consortium and no advantage to be gained by having a certain number of partners or types of partner. What matters is that the partnership is the right type and size to achieve the project objectives. In particular under FP6 IPs and NoEs there is the need to ensure a ‘critical mass’ so that the research and the integration has momentum and a lasting effect.

 Teaming agreements

design feature

As an FP6 project will be a major commitment with financial and legal implications it is important to ensure that all the project partners have a clear understanding of the nature of the collaboration and are fully committed to it. For the project itself, this understanding will be covered by the Consortium Agreement which is a legally binding agreement that sits alongside the consortium’s contract with the Commission.

In the early stages of formulating a collaborative consortium the Consortium Agreement has not yet been formed. However, it is often the case that ‘teaming agreements’ are made. These cover aspects such as confidentiality, non-competition, background IPR etc. in order that the prospective partners have some basic rules for their early stage interactions. There are no EU ‘rules’ for teaming agreements. Clearly they should not conflict with the eventual Consortium Agreement and Commission contract, but they can be made to cover any of the risks and fears of the partners in the early tentative stages of consortium building.

  Contracts

design feature

Between the partners
To fix the conditions and modalities of co-operation between partners, the conclusion of a consortium agreement is obligatory for most of the actions (in particular for Networks of Excellence and Integrated Projects). The European Commission will not be a party within this agreement and will not have to give its approval to it. It will however provide a checklist with points potentially to be covered by a consortium agreement .

Between the Commission and the partners
For proposals selected for funding, the European Commission will conclude a contract establishing rights and obligations of all participants. This concerns in particular provisions for the scientific, technological and financial monitoring, for the updating of objectives, changes in consortium membership, payment of the Community financial contribution and rules for dissemination and use of knowledge. The contract will be concluded between the European Commission and all participants.

 Liabilities

design feature

The partners in a consortium are jointly and individually liable for the implementation of the contract. This means that if one contractor fails to perform their duties or to pay any financial reimbursement due to the Commission then the other partners are responsible for meeting those obligations.

  Tools

design feature

There are a number of ways to aid the consortium building and management process. There are commercially available project planning and group working tools. You should review all the tools potentially available, particularly those for good planning and communication, and those with which the partners may have prior experience, and use what seems to fit your requirements.


  Reference documents and sites:

design feature

 

 
 
Gathering information The main actions under Integrating Research Strengthening actions Structuring actions Overview of FP6 structure General advice Who can participate Choosing the instrument Consortium building Horizontal issues Understanding the work programme Understanding the call for proposals Using the Guides for Proposers Before the evaluation Evaluation by independent experts Finalisation of the evaluation Contract negotiation Consortium agreement Structure of the model contract Signature, entry into force A well-managed project Running the project Audits Problems Completion of a contract CORDIS