CORDIS Archive

View the original page arrowbar Legal Noticebar Print the page
This page has been archived. It will no longer be updated.

Rev.:2

ACTS 2000 +

Introduction

ACTS, as the EU programme in Advanced Communications and Services, has been launched in 1995 but already the lead-time of policy and strategy making raises the questions as to the future of collaborative R&D in this important domain.

For this reason, the AMC, G28 and the Commission Services entered into a reflection on the future requirements and options for cooperative R&D on an EU and international level. This note represents the results of the reflections so far.

1.1 Starting point

1.2 Trends characterising Advanced Communications and Services

1.3 Implications for the Fifth Framework Programme

2. Focus for the Future: Anthropocentric Communication

The ultimate objective of Communication is to provide for the needs of people in whatever form. All other objectives can be subsumed by this global objective, though obviously, it translates into many forms depending on the conditions and context. But as a help to orient cooperative research on an international scale, this global objective can help to focus the attention on requirements and options.

2.1 Challenges for the next decade

There are many challenges ahead but in the present context three stand out prominently

1) Complexity and

2) Cost-performance

3) Consensus

4) Control.

2.1.1 Complexity

As communications makes available more and more information the limiting factor becomes the ability of the person to perceive. 100ís of TV Channel do increase the choice, but at any one time a person will only watch one channel. A similar argument applies to the 1000ís of alternative services providers and the 100í000s of information products. The issue becomes that of enhancing the relevance, or in other words making sure that the communication provides the information wanted when, where and in the desired form. With the explosive growth of persons which might communicate (e.g. Internet community) or information services which compete with each other, this has no precise answer, but becomes inherently fuzzy. There are other factors which contribute to the challenge in complexity of advanced communications.

2.1.2 Cost-performance

It is easily overlooked that we are already benefiting for some time from very cheap broadband services, TV. Telephony is interactive and selective but it is still several orders of magnitude more expensive. While spectacular progress has been achieved in transmission, processing and storing, there remain numerous techno-economic obstacles before interactive video can become as universally affordable as Telephony and TV are today. A determined technological effort in many domains remains to be undertaken to achieve this kind of objective. Similarly the mobility has proved its attractiveness, but it has still a high price and much remains to be done to overcome band-width constraints. In short cost-performance remains for the foreseeable future a key challenges. Besides a determined effort to improve cost/performance of technology in general re-usable technology, as a basis for volume related cost reductions, need to be addressed.

2.1.3 Consensus

Communication is condemned to consensus because of its innate dependence on interworking on the level of the its use. With more actors getting involved in the value-chains making up communications applications, the need for consensus goes well beyond standards and includes technical solutions adapting to different application and regulatory environments. This constraint is particularly important for communication services and applications since the user wishes to roam world wide without loss of services. This contradicts the natural dispersive forces of competition and invocation. For this reason programmes such as RACE and now ACTS have made consensus formation in the domain of functional specifications a central objective, not to say their "raison d'etre".

For RACE operators, equipment vendors and research organisations formed a team of about 2000 technologists participating actively in consensus formation and the results contributed to the standardisation work of ETSI and others.

With ACTS R&D is carried out in the context of field trials which involves a much larger constituency, maybe as much as 10 times more persons are participating in the investigation of new services and applications. Naturally the consensus formation process used for 2000 and one suitable for 20í000 has to differ. For this reason a decentralisation has been implemented with the help of the Member States. A network of National Hosts has been set up to serve as ìwindowî to the field trials providing a powerful help for dialogue between the projects and the field trials sharing the objective of developing new services and ensuring their broad acceptance. In ACTS this is an essential feature, in what follows ACTS, it will remain essential.

2.1.4 Control

Information and its ìvectorî, the communication, is often referred to as the nervous system of society. Being of such fundamental importance, the question of who has what control over communications and under which conditions is implicitly posed. It is a matter of policy making on a national and global scale, to set the rules and conditions for the deployment, operation and use of communications. However, the technical answers to the user demand needs to provide the means of actually implementing the policies as defined and evolving with them. For this reason, R&D needs to include considerations relating to the implementation of communications-related policies providing for appropriate control and management techniques, what is referred to as pre-regulatory R&D.

2.1.5 Overview

Overview

3. SCOPE OF ACTS II

Following the anthropocentric objective, the demand for technological advance can be derived or at least related to the demands of society at large. This presentation will help to explain the contribution of communications technology in general and of EU R&D cooperation in particular, to meeting present and future needs.

3.1 Environmental Communications Technologies

This category of issues relates to the socio-economically motivated changes in the perception of needs. With the emerging information society the impact and relationship with social, economic and political order will require attention translating, inter alia, into specific objectives or guidance for technological efforts.

3.1.1 Socio-economic environment

Need to reduce pressure on natural environment and more efficient use of natural resources resulting in use of communications to address the following issues;

3.1.2 Cultural environment

3.1.3 Legislative/regulatory environment

Issues include:

3.2 Generic Services

This relates to the development of services which may in due course become universal services either because of their inherent characteristics or because they form essential elements of aggregate service offers.

3.2.1 Specific Issues

3.2 Infrastructure

This regroups all issues which address the physical facilities and capabilities required to support transport, access, availability, manageability and cost-performance overall. It included all modes of transmission and their combination as well as hard-ware, soft-ware and org-ware solutions.

3.3.1 Network (main features of the future TLC network

Broadband Wireless ATM

3.3.2 Specific Issues

3.4 Architecture

Relates to issues of basic principles of constructing and engineering of communications spaces to meet collective, group and individual needs. It has to reflect state-of-the-art, quality and operating conditions applicable to a given context and environment.

3.5 Design

Within the constraints of sound architectural principles the communications design provides the adaptation in time, space and presentation to create an attractive communication space.

3.6 Management

With the increase in choice of infrastructures, services, presentation and content provisions for management are required both for ensuring a fair return on service as well an open service provision essential for fair competition.

3.7 Perception

Anthropocentric communications implies the ability to communicate to achieve perception. This relates to the technical issues related to provide for perceptive differentiation.