Over the period from January 1999 to September 2002, the Health action lines have been open for call for proposals with fixed deadlines at several occasions. These are summarised below:
The following data are statistics for the period January 1999 to September 2002 for contracts in the portfolio of the unit Applications relating to Health. As the 5th Framework Programme and the IST Programme are now at the end of the programme activities, these data represent a fair snapshot of the different calls. Statistics are, of course, due to evolve as projects are amended during their lifetime.
Further we would like to draw the attention of the reader to the fact that the Commission services has not attempted to draw any conclusion from the statistics represented, as for the above reason it is too early to make policy statements.
The table below gives an overall view of proposals received, projects resulting from the RTD calls and other types of actions.
| 1st Call | 3rd Call | 6th Call | 7th Call | 8th Call | Support Measures | CPA | CRAFT | Exploratory Awards | Grants | TOTAL | ||
| Date | March 1999 | February 2000 | January 2001 | July 2001 | November 2001 | Open Call | All Calls | SME Call | SME Call | Open Call | ||
| Proposals submitted | 202 | 119 | 109 | 7 | 186 | 58 | 71 | 14 | 766 | |||
| Retained Proposals | 27 | 24 | 22 | 1 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 9 | 12 | 4 | 134 | |
| EC Contribution (Euro) | 45.965.900 26,4 % |
38.292.902 22,0 % |
31.417.738 18,0 % |
4.949.966 2,8 % |
19.463.957 11,2 % |
7.225.066 4,1 % |
21.338.471 12,2% |
5.164.149 3,0% |
260.625 0,1 % |
199.559 0,1 % |
174.278.333 100,0 % | |
The following table provides a breakdown by cluster.
| Main contracts | SME specific measures | ||||||||||
| Cluster | Data | RTD | AM+TN | TU | Total | Subventions | SME EA | SME CRAFT | Total | Grand Total | |
| C | Projects | 20 | 2 | 7 | 29 | 29 | |||||
| Project Cost (€) | 81.516.948 | 1.191.349 | 7.631.104 | 90.339.401 | 90.339.401 | ||||||
| Project EC Contribution (€) | 43.260.476 | 718.123 | 4.958.025 | 48.936.624 | 48.936.624 | ||||||
| Average Duration | 31,8 | 18,0 | 22,3 | 28,2 | 28,2 | ||||||
| Average Number of Participants | 8,8 | 6,0 | 7,3 | 8,2 | 8,2 | ||||||
| Total Number of participants | 175 | 12 | 51 | 238 | 238 | ||||||
| P | Projects | 28 | 2 | 30 | 30 | ||||||
| Project Cost (€) | 93.750.887 | 1.757.067 | 95.507.954 | 95.507.954 | |||||||
| Project EC Contribution (€) | 47.526.940 | 992.800 | 48.519.740 | 48.519.740 | |||||||
| Average Duration | 30,5 | 18,0 | 29,7 | 29,7 | |||||||
| Average Number of Participants | 8,3 | 5,5 | 8,1 | 8,1 | |||||||
| Total Number of participants | 231 | 11 | 242 | 242 | |||||||
| HP | Projects | 34 | 9 | 6 | 49 | 4 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 74 | |
| Project Cost (€) | 99.766.224 | 6.417.934 | 13.687.717 | 119.871.875 | 1.473.103 | 347.500 | 10.919.124 | 11.266.624 | 132.611.602 | ||
| Project EC Contribution (€) | 56.099.702 | 6.109.943 | 8.590.991 | 70.800.636 | 199.559 | 260.625 | 5.164.149 | 5.424.774 | 76.424.969 | ||
| Average Duration | 30,4 | 25,3 | 21 | 28,3 | 7,5 | 6,1 | 24,0 | 13,8 | 23,0 | ||
| Average Number of Participants | 7,8 | 5,4 | 8,5 | 7,4 | 1,0 | 2,1 | 7,9 | 4,6 | 6,3 | ||
| Total Number of participants | 264 | 49 | 51 | 364 | 4 | 25 | 71 | 96 | 464 | ||
| C, P , HP | Projects | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Project Cost (€) | 397.000 | 397.000 | 397.000 | ||||||||
| Project EC Contribution (€) | 397.000 | 397.000 | 397.000 | ||||||||
| Average Duration | 18,0 | 18,0 | 18,0 | ||||||||
| Average Number of Participants | 3,0 | 3,0 | 3,0 | ||||||||
| Total Number of participants | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||
| Total Projects | 82 | 12 | 15 | 109 | 4 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 134 | ||
| Total Project Cost (€) | 275.034.059 | 8.006.283 | 23.075.888 | 306.116.230 | 1.473.103 | 347.500 | 10.919.124 | 11.266.624 | 318.855.957 | ||
| Total Project EC Contribution (€) | 146.887.118 | 7.225.067 | 14.541.816 | 166.654.000 | 199.559 | 260.625 | 5.164.149 | 5.424.774 | 174.278.333 | ||
| Average Duration | 30,6 | 23,5 | 21,2 | 28,6 | 7,5 | 6,1 | 24,0 | 13,8 | 25,6 | ||
| Average of Number of Participants | 8,2 | 5,3 | 7,5 | 7,8 | 1,0 | 2,1 | 7,9 | 4,6 | 7,1 | ||
| Total Sum of Number of participants | 670 | 64 | 113 | 847 | 4 | 25 | 71 | 96 | 947 | ||

84 % of the budget is allocated through the regular calls for RTD proposals.

Because of the nature of the activities in KA1 and in the health domain, Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) are very well represented (although uncertainties related to the definition of large enterprises or SME remain due to an imprecise filling-in of the statistical part of the Contract Preparation Forms). An active industrial participation is to be noted.
The following figure shows the geographic distribution of the co-ordinating organisations.
The next figure shows the total EC Contribution for partners in EU member states. Major non-EU countries include Cyprus, Israel, and Norway. More than twenty other countries receive funding.
The following figure breaks the figures down for the associated states (EFTA-EEA, NAS and others).