Objective
Background. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common and severe hospital-adquired infections, and multidrugresistant gram-negative bacilli (MDR-GNB) constitute the main etiology in many countries. Inappropriate empiric antimicrobial treatment is associated with increased mortality. In this context, the empirical treatment of choice for VAP is unknown. Colistin, and “old” drug, is now the antimicrobial with greatest in vitro activity against MDR-GNB. However, no randomized clinical trial with colistin has been carried out. Additional aspects of colistin are also not well known, such as the appearance of resistant strains or alterations in the intestinal microbiome during treatment. Furthermore, conventional microbiological techniques take 48 to 72 hours to identify pathogens and determine their susceptibility. This is too long if empiric treatment is inappropriate.
Objetives. The overall goal is the optimisation of the treatment of VAP caused by MDR-GNB, by defining a gold standard empiric therapy and reducing the period of time needed for the determination of the etiology and susceptibility of pathogens.
Methods. MagicBullet proposes a randomized, open label, multicenter, clinical trial to compare the safety and efficacy of colistin vs. meropenem, both combined with levofloxacin, for empirical treatment of VAP. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of colistin will be determined. Evaluation of the impact of the both treatments in the intestinal microbiome of patients and in the Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common and severe hospital-adquired infections, and multidrug-resistant gramnegative bacilli (MDR-GNB) constitute the main etiology in many countries. Inappropriate empiric antimicrobial treatment is associated with increased mortality. In this context, the empirical treatment of choice for VAP is unknown. Colistin, and “old” drug, is now the antimicrobial with greatest in vitro activity against MDR-GNB. However, no randomized clinical trial with colistin has been carried out. Additional aspects of colistin are also not well known, such as the appearance of resistant strains or alterations in the intestinal microbiome during treatment. Furthermore, conventional microbiological techniques take 48 to 72 hours to identify pathogens and determine their susceptibility. This is too long if empiric treatment is inappropriate.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: https://op.europa.eu/en/web/eu-vocabularies/euroscivoc.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: https://op.europa.eu/en/web/eu-vocabularies/euroscivoc.
- medical and health sciences clinical medicine pneumology
- social sciences sociology demography mortality
- natural sciences biological sciences microbiology
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
FP7-HEALTH-2011-two-stage
See other projects for this call
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Coordinator
41071 SEVILLA
Spain
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.