Objective
Universities worldwide are in the midst of a dramatic transformation of their administrative and scholarly goals. Such reforms are driven by a sense of global competition among universities (over students, faculty, funding and thus prestige) and such increased competition is now requiring universities to set strategic plans. Complementing strategies for financial solvency, global ranking, and curricula, universities also approach their identity in a strategic manner and increasingly concentrate efforts on branding. Thus, universities emulate managerial practices and borrow marketing tools from the corporate world and such emulation creates tension with the ethos of the university as a public institution. We therefore
ask: How are universities creating a brand? Why are they engaging in branding? And, what are the implications of the coming of “brand society” onto campus? To consider these matters, we are compiling quantitative and qualitative data of visual material images (visual data on brands, emblems, webpages and favicons) in 14 European countries and additional 19 countries worldwide. We draw such data from university archives and publicity material, as well as from interviews with university administrators, faculty and branding consultants. We are also compiling information about the university’s structure, capacity and history, as well as about its national context, into order to analyze the causal mechanism for such worldwide branding trend. Such analyses will address both the historical changes to the university (longitudinal) and cross-national differences in university structuration (cross-sectional). Conclusions will come to wrestle with such issues as the university’s evolving mission and sense of identity, the nature of knowledge and its commercialization, and sectorial changes in the knowledge economy. For such discussions, I draw on the scholarly fields of higher education studies, organization studies, and globalization studies.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- humanities history and archaeology history
- social sciences other social sciences development studies development theories global development studies globalization
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
FP7-PEOPLE-2012-CIG
See other projects for this call
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
MC-CIG - Support for training and career development of researcher (CIG)
Coordinator
91904 JERUSALEM
Israel
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.