Objective
When a group of agents has to choose one action from a given set of feasible actions, it faces a collective-choice problem. If agents have different information about the consequences of each action, or different preferences over consequences, agents have different preferences over the action they want the group to take. The group must make a choice aggregating these divergent preferences. For instance, citizens of any given country have different policy preferences that are aggregated to generate a policy outcome.
One way to aggregate conflicting preferences to make a choice is through conflict: agents exert competing costly efforts in a confrontation, and the group choice is determined, perhaps probabilistically, by these efforts. Alternatively, in democratic societies, group actions, such as policies, are chosen by means of bargaining and voting. In an indirect or representative democracy, citizens elect representatives, who bargain over policy proposals. Ultimately, a policy is approved by voting, and becomes the group choice.
I propose to study the problem of resource allocation and ideological policy-making, both at the national level in the realm of domestic political economy, and at the supranational level in the context of international relations, through the lens of the game-theoretic advances in collective choice and social choice theory.
I will study the problem of allocating a fixed amount of a resource or desirable good to a set of agents (citizens, regions, industries, or countries) with conflicting claims, and the related problem of choosing an ideological policy outcome when agents affected by the policy have divergent preferences over outcomes, and I will compare the solutions that are obtained if outcomes are determined by conflict, or by voting in a representative democracy with a presidential, or with a parliamentarian system.
The results will help to design better institutions, implement better public policies and improve governance.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- social sciences political sciences political policies public policies
- social sciences sociology governance
- social sciences political sciences government systems democracy
- social sciences economics and business economics political economy
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
FP7-PEOPLE-2013-CIG
See other projects for this call
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
MC-CIG - Support for training and career development of researcher (CIG)
Coordinator
BS8 1QU BRISTOL
United Kingdom
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.