Objective
Predicting others’ actions is crucial for acting in a social world. How we come to these predictions is hotly debated. The simulation account states that the motor commands used to predict the sensory consequences of our own actions are also used to predict others’ actions. In contrast, rationality theory suggests that predictions of others’ actions are based on inborn, abstract rules and thus rely on a different mechanism than predictions of our own actions. To address this controversy, I suggest to study how predictions of own and others’ actions develop during infancy. In Study 1, infants of 6- and 12-months of age will reach and grasp for objects, and observe someone else reaching and grasping for objects, while their hand and eye movements are tracked. Hand and eye movement tracking can reveal whether and when infants predict the goal of the action. Results will reveal whether the two types of predictions develop in synchrony. Study 2 tests the congruence in brain activation between reaching performance and observation while infants’ brain responses are measured using fNIRS. Study 3 will verify whether the basic mechanism found for predicting others’ simple reaching actions also applies to a real-world situation involving multiple objects and a sequence of reach and grasp actions, such as sandwich making. To this end, 3-year-old children will be asked to make a sandwich and to observe someone else making a sandwich while their eye and hand movements will be tracked. Taken together, the three proposed studies will show whether the same or a different neurocognitive mechanism serves to predict own and others’ actions and whether this mechanism extends to real-world applications. If so, this mechanism can enable people to understand each others’ behaviour. The findings will be informative for psychology at large as the mechanism for understanding others plays a fundamental role in social interaction.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- social sciences psychology
- natural sciences computer and information sciences artificial intelligence computer vision motion analysis
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
FP7-PEOPLE-2013-IEF
See other projects for this call
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Coordinator
751 05 Uppsala
Sweden
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.