Objective
The proposed project aims at investigating the metaphysics of indeterminacy in ancient philosophy. By relying on the aid of
contemporary metaphysics (in particular, Van Inwagen's materialism and Merricks', and Stage-theory of material objects),
the project will show that the metaphysics of indeterminacy was an important, yet neglected, part of ancient metaphysics,
from the time of Democritus to that of Aenesidemus.
The project will deal with a variety of Greek philosophers, traditionally understood as subjectivists (this very general label as
meant to include relativists, sceptics, infallibilists and nihilists). These are the following ones: Democritus, Protagoras and
Gorgias, Heraclitus, the Socratic schools of the Cyrenaics (including later exponents of the school, such as Theodorus the
Godless) and the Megarians (Euclides, Eubulides, Diodorus Cronus, Stilpo), Pyrrho and neo-pyrrhonism (Aenesidemus).
The project will demonstrate that, although in different ways, all the philosophers just mentioned adhered to a view of the
world according to which either 1) objects of perception are indeterminate with regard to their properties or 2) objects in
themselves are best understood as indeterminate items (in particular, on this latter view, objects as stable and unitary items
are denied to be existing).
The project is both historical and philosophical, in so far as not only does it attempt to reconstruct the details of ancient
conceptions of metaphysical indeterminacy, but it will also try to demonstrate the philosophical viability of those conceptions
by drawing close parallelisms with current theories of metaphysical indeterminacy.
To appreciate the pervasiveness of metaphysical indeterminacy in ancient Greek philosophy is tantamount to providing a
revolutionary insight in the history of ancient metaphysics (and of metaphysics tout court) by challenging the standard view
that sees it dominated by Plato’s and Aristotle’s different, yet cognate, essentialisms.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- humanities philosophy, ethics and religion philosophy history of philosophy ancient philosophy
- humanities history and archaeology history
- natural sciences physical sciences quantum physics
- humanities philosophy, ethics and religion philosophy metaphysics
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
H2020-EU.1.3. - EXCELLENT SCIENCE - Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme -
H2020-EU.1.3.2. - Nurturing excellence by means of cross-border and cross-sector mobility
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
MSCA-IF-EF-ST - Standard EF
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) H2020-MSCA-IF-2014
See all projects funded under this callCoordinator
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
DH1 3LE DURHAM
United Kingdom
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.