Objective
The origins of biodiversity have intrigued evolutionary biologists since the earliest times, and have resulted in a plethora of theories to explain these origins. To date, there has been a tendency to use distribution patterns of biota to confirm preferred hypotheses (a field known broadly as historical biogeography), instead of a genuine attempt to test between competing hypotheses.
A recently emerging field utilises the ease with which DNA sequences can be read to provide more objective testing of hypotheses; an approach referred to as 'comparative phylogeography'. Here we advocate the use of a novel replicated approach to distinguish between sets of alternative hypotheses as a route towards testing the major theories.
A number of theories have been put forward for diversification in one of the global 'hotspots', the archipelagos of South-East Asia, although a general theory has yet to emerge. This region of high species richness allows for a replicated sampling of taxa to infer general biogeographic pattern s. Our approach aims to examine phylogenetic and population genetic patterns in multiple co-distributed freshwater taxa from the region, to enable us to test between competing hypotheses of diversification.
Freshwater taxa are ideal model organisms for such an approach as they reflect well the underlying geological history of a given region, due to limited dispersal abilities to cross marine environments between land-masses. A further aim of the present study is to contribute towards documenting the rapidly declining biodiversity of SE Asia, which is a high priority in global conservation at present.
Findings will provide a case study both for the experimental analysis of trends in biodiversity and the use of such data in biodiversity conservation- two issues of high applicability to other geographic regions, especially in those subjected to major anthropogenic impacts.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: https://op.europa.eu/en/web/eu-vocabularies/euroscivoc.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: https://op.europa.eu/en/web/eu-vocabularies/euroscivoc.
- humanities history and archaeology history
- natural sciences biological sciences genetics DNA
- natural sciences biological sciences biodiversity conservation
- natural sciences biological sciences ecology ecosystems
- natural sciences earth and related environmental sciences physical geography
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
FP6-2005-MOBILITY-7
See other projects for this call
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
IIF - Marie Curie actions-Incoming International Fellowships
Coordinator
BANGOR
United Kingdom
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.