Objective
One of the main challenges of software engineering is verifying the correctness of software. In this proposal we focus on correctness of the code per input rather than full program verification. This methodology associates with every function to be computed a new piece of code called a checker, which given any possibly buggy program for the function and an input, “checks” whether the program on this input computes the function correctly. We further aim on correcting buggy programs using self-testers and self-correctors. A self-corrector that is given a potentially buggy program which is guaranteed to compute the function correctly on a random input, “corrects” the program on any given input. A self-tester tests whether a program is correct on a random input. The focus of the achievements in the field has been the design of efficient checkers (and self correcters/self testers) for *specific* efficiently computable functions exploiting either their algebraic or combinatorial properties. In recent works we have demonstrated relation between highly symmetric error correcting codes and testing and correcting. Moreover we managed to design checkers for functions characterized by their complexity. In light of the this new body of work we suggest to revisit the checking and correcting methodology, emphasizing a general error correcting approach and complexity theoretic approach, rather than a function specific approach.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
FP7-PEOPLE-2009-RG
See other projects for this call
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Coordinator
52900 Ramat Gan
Israel
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.