The application of two PASSYS identification methodsFunded under: FP1-ENNONUC 3C
The application of two PASSYS identification methods is examined. CTLSM performs well on the task of identification of physical parameters, although the lengthy duration of the program runs is a major disadvantage. Results are also presented from evaluations performed with the program MRQT on datasets from the light-weight test cells in Ispra. This program is easier to use, and gives results very quickly; however it does compute very large confidence intervals, for reasons which are not quite clear.
Bibliographic Reference: Paper presented: Parameter Identification Methods and Physical Reality, Ispra (IT), Oct. 26-28, 1992
Availability: Available from (1) as Paper EN 37267 ORA
Record Number: 199310096 / Last updated on: 1994-11-29
Original language: en
Available languages: en