Community Research and Development Information Service - CORDIS

Abstract

This slide presentation, formatted as a PDF file, presents the following conclusions:
Heating beams and diagnostic beam have different merits and demerits;
Convergent beamlets are a concern;
Present indications are that HNB is better;
Polarimetry and ratiometry have slightly different viewingrequirements and different sensitivities to Er;
Experience is needed of using the ratiometric technique;
Labyrinth tests are underway;
Certain features of the system are becoming clear, but flexibility of design is crucial.

Additional information

Authors: HAWKES N C, Association Euratom-UKAEA. Culham.(GB);BRIX M, Association Euratom-UKAEA. Culham.(GB);NEGUS C, Association Euratom-UKAEA. Culham.(GB);SURREY E, Association Euratom-UKAEA. Culham.(GB);MALAQUIAS A, Instituto Superior Technico, Associacao Euratom-IST, Lisboa (PT);VON HELLERMANN M, Association Euratom-FOM. Rijnhuizen (NL);KULDKEPP M, Association Euratom-VR (KTH), Stockholm (SE);RACHLEW E, Association Euratom-VR (KTH), Stockholm (SE);LOTTE P, Département de Recherches sur la Fusion Contrôlée, Association Euratom-CEA sur la Fusion, CEA Cadarache, Saint-Paul-lez-Durance (FR)
Bibliographic Reference: An oral paper given at: 5th ITPA Meeting on Diagnostics Held at: St. Petersburg, Russia, 14 - 18 July 2003
Availability: Available from Association EURATOM-CEA, Département de Recherches sur la Fusion Contrôlée, CEA Cadarache, F-13108 St Paul-Lez-Durance, France Tel: (+33) 4 42 25 70 01; Fax: (+33) 4 42 25 64 21 E-mail: dirdrfc@drfc.cad.cea.fr
Record Number: 200417315 / Last updated on: 2004-01-07
Category: PUBLICATION
Original language: en
Available languages: en
Follow us on: RSS Facebook Twitter YouTube Managed by the EU Publications Office Top