Community Research and Development Information Service - CORDIS

Abstract

The 5th FWP EURSAFE Project highlighted iodine chemistry in the containment as one of the issues requiring further research in order to reduce source term uncertainties. Consequently, a series of studies was launched in the 6th FWP SARNET Project aimed at improving the predictability of iodine behaviour during severe accidents via a better understanding of the complex chemical phenomena in the containment. In particular, SARNET has striven to foster common interpretation of integral and separate effect test data, production of new or improved models where necessary, and compilation of the existing knowledge of the subject. The work has been based on a substantial amount of experimental information made available from bench-scale projects (PARIS and EPICUR), via intermediate-scale tests (CAIMAN) to large-scale facilities (SISYPHE, THAI and PHEBUS-FP). In the experimental field, particular attention has been paid to two specific issues: the effects of radiation on both aqueous and gaseous iodine chemistry, and the mass transfer of iodine between aqueous and gaseous phases. Comparisons between calculations and results of the EPICUR and CAIMAN experiments suggest that the aqueous phase chemistry is reasonably well understood, although there are still some areas of uncertainty. Interpretation of integral experiments, like PHEBUS-FPT2, indicated that radiation-induced conversion of molecular iodine into particulate species (I(x)O(y)) could be responsible for the gaseous iodine depletion observed in the long-term. However, the results of much simpler, small-scale experiments have shown that further improvements in understanding and modelling are still needed. Mass transfer modelling has been extended to cover evaporating sump conditions based on SISYPHE data; however, application of this model to the larger scale THAI experiments seems not to be straightforward.

Additional information

Authors: DICKINSON S, National Nuclear Laboratory, Oxon (UK);ANDREO F, EDF, Villeurbanne (FR);KARKELA T, VTT, Espoo (FI);BALL J, AECL, Chalk River (CA);BOSLAND L, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), St-Paul-Lez-Durance (FR);CANTREL L, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), St-Paul-Lez-Durance (FR);GIRAULT N, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), St-Paul-Lez-Durance (FR);GUILBERT S, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), St-Paul-Lez-Durance (FR);MUN C, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), St-Paul-Lez-Durance (FR);FUNKE F, AREVA-ANP, Erlangen (DE);HOLM J, Chalmers University, Gothenberg (SE);HERRANZ L E, CIEMAT, Madrid (ES);HOUSIADAS C, Demokritos, Athens (EL);DUCROS G, Département de Recherches sur la Fusion Contrôlée, Association Euratom-CEA sur la Fusion, CEA Cadarache, Saint-Paul-lez-Durance (FR);SABROUX J-C, IRSN, Saclay (FR);WEBER G, GRS mbH, Garching (DE)
Bibliographic Reference: An article published in: Progress in Nuclear Energy, Volume 52, Issue 1, January 2010, Pages 128-135
Availability: This article can be accessed online by subscribers, and can be ordered online by non-subscribers, at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2009.09.009
Record Number: 201010044 / Last updated on: 2010-01-13
Category: PUBLICATION
Original language: en
Available languages: en