CORDIS
EU research results

CORDIS

English EN
How citizens try to influence politics and why. International comparisons of movement and party politics

How citizens try to influence politics and why. International comparisons of movement and party politics

Objective

Protests in ‘new’ democracies about ‘stolen elections’, demonstrations in ‘old’ democracies against austerity measures, occupied squares all over the world against inequality and for better governance. Some argue that contentious politics gains importance and party politics declines. Is that so and why would that be? Why is it that some individuals engage in politics while others remain apathetic? Why is it that some citizens take the electoral route, while others engage in contentious politics? The truth is that we do not really know. Should we bother? I think we should. Citizens who are actively involved in politics are an asset to democracy. Understanding how and why people take part in politics would help to build more democratic societies.

The proposed project compares participation in contentious and non-contentious politics in various countries within a single theoretical and methodological framework. A central tenet of this research proposal is that sooner or later every citizen might get involved in politics. I seek the reason why in the interplay of dynamics at the individual, the organizational, and the societal level. What are the motives people have? What are the appeals parties and movement organizations disseminate; and what are the opportunities and constraints regimes impose?

Comparison is the core of the project. It encompasses four subproject: (1) a meta-analysis of publications on movement and party politics; (2) comparisons of political participation over time and countries in global survey data; (3) focus group discussions to understand the formation of political engagement and disengagement in four ‘old’ democracies (the Netherlands, Germany, Switzerland, U.S.A.), two post-communist ‘new’ democracies (Hungary, Romania) and two post-authoritarian ‘new’ democracies (Brazil, Argentina) and Greece as a country that was hit harder than any country by the financial crisis; (4) experimental focused surveys among 1000 respondents to quantify patterns of political participation in the same nine countries.
Leaflet | Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, Credit: EC-GISCO, © EuroGeographics for the administrative boundaries

Principal Investigator

Pieter Gijsbertus Klandermans (Prof.)

Host institution

STICHTING VU

Address

De Boelelaan 1105
1081 Hv Amsterdam

Netherlands

Activity type

Higher or Secondary Education Establishments

EU Contribution

€ 1 721 999,96

Principal Investigator

Pieter Gijsbertus Klandermans (Prof.)

Administrative Contact

Isjah Koppejan (Mrs.)

Beneficiaries (5)

Sort alphabetically

Sort by EU Contribution

Expand all

STICHTING VU

Netherlands

EU Contribution

€ 1 721 999,96

KOZEP-EUROPAI EGYETEM

Hungary

EU Contribution

€ 219 000

UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE GENERAL SAN MARTIN

Argentina

EU Contribution

€ 68 100

FUNDACAO UNIVERSIDADE DE BRASILIA

Brazil

THE UNIVERSITY OF EXETER

United Kingdom

EU Contribution

€ 221 700,02

Project information

Grant agreement ID: 339829

Status

Closed project

  • Start date

    1 January 2014

  • End date

    31 December 2018

Funded under:

FP7-IDEAS-ERC

  • Overall budget:

    € 2 230 799,98

  • EU contribution

    € 2 230 799,98

Hosted by:

STICHTING VU

Netherlands

This project is featured in...