CORDIS
EU research results

CORDIS

English EN
Voting on the future: Imaginaries and motivations in referendum decisions against extractive industries in Colombia.

Voting on the future: Imaginaries and motivations in referendum decisions against extractive industries in Colombia.

Objective

For countries in the global south, extractive industries can provide governments with a shortcut to economic development. For countries in the global south, extractive industries can provide governments with a shorcut to economic development. However, many communities where those project would take place reject them upfront and advocate for development of a different kind. In a unique and recent phenomenon, local communities in Colombia are organising referendums that halt resource extraction altogether. Since their appearance, very little research has been done to understand this phenomenon. Voting for or against a particular extractive project gathers an array of values, motivations and imaginaries that go beyond endorsement or rejection. Yet, voting in a certain way need not mean unity of opinions, and can obscure the struggles of campesinos and ethnic minorities for equality and access to land. Colombia’s legal framework permits citizens to call for referendums to decide issues that affect them. Wanting to vote for or against extractivism implies a desire to define the terms of the future in a region. The objective of this project is to explain the role of referendums against and in favour of extractive industries in articulating, or not, alternatives to extractivist development. It will do so by questioning whether a No to extractivism means a Yes to an alternative path to development, or if it means the continuation of the current social struggles. This in-depth study will employ ethnographic fieldwork, including participant-observation, interviews, and photography, to document the practices and discourses of actors involved in referendums. Referendums in Colombia provide insight of the wider trend of plebiscite democracy (e.g. Colombian peace and corruption referendums, Brexit, Catalonia) as supplement to institutional democracy (e.g. centralised, technocratic), in which casting a vote means more than endorsement or rejection of a particular political project.
Leaflet | Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, Credit: EC-GISCO, © EuroGeographics for the administrative boundaries

Coordinator

GOETEBORGS UNIVERSITET

Address

Vasaparken
405 30 Goeteborg

Sweden

Activity type

Higher or Secondary Education Establishments

EU Contribution

€ 203 852,16

Project information

Grant agreement ID: 838371

Status

Grant agreement signed

  • Start date

    1 February 2020

  • End date

    31 January 2022

Funded under:

H2020-EU.1.3.2.

  • Overall budget:

    € 203 852,16

  • EU contribution

    € 203 852,16

Coordinated by:

GOETEBORGS UNIVERSITET

Sweden