Final Report Summary - DANCERS (DANube macroregion: Capacity building and Excellence in River Systems (basin, delta and sea))
Executive Summary:
This document summarises the main outputs of the project: DANube macroregion: Capacity building and Excellence in River Systems (basin, delta and sea) (DANCERS) which aims to develop new instruments and tools for environmental research in the Danube Region. The project envisaged that these instruments should build upon existing national, regional and European projects. Hence DANCERS has critically analysed what has been achieved so far in the region to design innovative solutions to strengthen knowledge transfer in this area. This has been accomplished through meetings between representatives of the academic and business communities and decision makers, interested in advancing integrated management of the Danube –Black Sea system.
The main deliverable of DANCERS has been a toolbox of instruments, that include (1) a strategic research agenda; (2) plans of a distributed research infrastructure for the Danube – Black Sea system; and (3) Proposals for an integrated educational program.
The project final deliverables are openly accessible on the project website www.dancers-fp7.eu
Project Context and Objectives:
Recent geopolitical changes (the fall of communism in Central and Eastern Europe), the disintegration of the USSR in 1991 and creation of the European Union in 1994, have created the essential pre-conditions to develop environmental research programmes that for the first time, can span the entirety of the Danube Region (as defined in EU Strategy for Danube Region). Here, the Danube – Black Sea is envisaged as a single and integrated macrosystem given the need to consider the Danube in its entirety including its impacts and interactions with society from its source to the western Black Sea.
To achieve the project aims (to develop new instruments to enhance environmental research), DANCERS focussed the three pillars of Research and Innovation (i. Science and Innovation Agenda; ii. Research Infrastructures; and iii. Human Capital) – and their relation to three categories of stakeholder (i. Policy and Decision Makers; ii. Business / Industry community; and iii. Academia).
The project objectives were to:
• Critically analyse achievements in integrated river – delta – sea management in the Danube – Black Sea placing them within the wider international context
• Identify strong and weak areas of regional environmental research
• Define a set of instruments to enhance environmental research and innovation in the Danube Region
The final deliverable of DANCERS was a toolbox of instruments, specifically:
1. A Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda to 2020 and beyond (SRIA)
2. A concept and detailed plan of the two existing distributed research infrastructures in the region which are currently EU Flagship Projects and which are required to implement the SRIA
3. Proposals for an integrated educational programme (EDU).
Most of the important players from countries involved in Priority Area 7 of the Action Plan of the EU Strategy for the Danube Region are also members of the DANCERS consortium.
Project Results:
The DANCERS philosophy foresaw that all activities should be grouped according to the following order: screening what has been performed so far in the Danube Region (WP1), understanding which are the strong and weak points, which are the positive examples and what is further needed (WP2) and the toolbox od instruments, as final deliverables (WP3). This is why the introduction to the S&T results presents the activities performed in each WP.
WP 1 - Mapping of national, EU and international projects/programmes/initiatives (including results) related to research and innovation in the fluvial – deltaic – coastal environments within the Danube - Black Sea Macrosystem.
WP1 gathered together existing information on projects and programs on water management in the Danube region. In doing so, the WP drew upon the recent Danube River Basin Management Plan (ICPDR 2009), and focussed on the three main domains: life sciences (including environmental aspects), earth sciences and socio-economics. The work was undertaken at a variety of levels (national, regional, European, International organizations) and was structured into the three main pillars: Scientific Agenda, Research& Infrastructure and Human Capital.
Summary
The projects and programs were collected, firstly using an online questionnaire and secondly via an internet search.
A project metadatabase was constructed using the open source software geoNetwork. This was designed to satisfy the objectives of WP1, and subsequent WPs. Hence the main purpose of the metadata base was:
• to provide structured information to assess the collected projects,
• to improve data access and
• to promote the sharing of obtained knowledge.
The DANCERS metadatabase server is accessible via http://wcl-geo.boku.ac.at/geonetwork/srv/eng/search or via the project website (username: guest, password: DANCERS
In total 478 projects are listed in the metadatabase (status: May 2015). Production of the database was a key task of the first project year, however, the metadatabase remained active in the second project year. Further questionnaires were returned and imported (the last questionnaire returned in December 2014) and additional projects were entered manually (the last direct entry performed in April 2015).
Figure 1 Server Statistics showing the number of project hits
The server statistics show that in the second project year (May 2014 to May 2015) >7400 hits were logged from 16 different nations (see Fig 1). The metadatabase will remain active for at least 12 months after the project end.
Table 1 Summary of tasks in WP1
Task no. Task name Responsible Institution Resources (months)
Task 1.1 Setup of a metadatabase according to the data collected and international standards Wassercluster Lunz (WCL) 6.50
Task 1.2 Assessment of previous and ongoing EU initiatives Wassercluster Lunz (WCL)
Task 1.3 Assessment of EU Structural Funds including IPA and ENPI University of Novi Sad (UNS) 3.75
Task 1.4 Assessment of dedicated initiatives funded by countries from the Danube region through R&D programmes Romanian National Institute of Biological Sciences (INSB) 5.00
Task 1.5 National public funds through other agencies Széchenyi István University (SZEC) 3.75
Task 1.6 Other international funds UNESCO-IHE 2.50
Progress during the reporting period:
The Grant Agreement was signed in May 2013, being effective from June 1st 2013. The first reporting period ended on 30 May 2014, the second reporting period ended on 31 May 2015. The progress on each task is summarised in Table 1 below, including comments on most important activities.
In developing the database, the leaders of tasks 1.2 to 1.6 developed a common approach to data collection: An online questionnaire was developed under the lead of INSB and designed to gather projects of all five tasks. Returned questionnaires were input to the metadatabase before the end of 2013. Simultaneously projects were entered directly into the online database. In the beginning of 2014 a quality check of the collected entries was performed and a first evaluation and analyses of the metadatabase entries was made.
WP 2 - Understanding the linkages, gaps and needs in knowledge transfer
WP 2 reviewed strengths and weaknesses in the R&I for integrated environmental management in the Danube Region. The WP sought to develop a “knowledge matrix” – to achieve integrated knowledge transfer in the Danube Region. This was achieved through interactive events with the three main pillars of stakeholders communities: 1) science, 2) industry and 3) policy makers, decision makers and administrations.
Summary:
As a result of changes accepted at the first General Assembly, coordination of WP2 was moved from BafG to the project coordinator, GeoEcoMar which also assumed the leadership of Tasks 2.2. and 2.5.
WP2 was originally foreseen to commence in Month 9 of the project (February 2014). However, the WP and Task coordinators considered it important to commence preparation of the first two workshops before this date, and hence the actual starting date was January 2014. Thus, the list of attendees, invitations and draft agendas were established 2 months before March 2014, when the first 2 workshops were held. The workshops (accommodation for all participants and travel for invited guests, workshop venue, etc.) were co-funded by the Romanian Ministry for National Education.
A brief description of the tasks, coordinators and Person Month resources is presented in the Table 2 below.
Table 2 Summary of tasks in WP2
Task no. Task name Responsible Institution Resources (months)
Task 2.1 Workshop with Science community Hellenic Centre of Marine Researches (HCMR) 5.45
Task 2.2 Workshop with Industry and Business community GeoEcoMar 5.45
Task 2.3 Workshop with policy makers, decision makers and administrations Zentrum fur Soziale Innovation (ZSI) 5.45
Task 2.4 Dialogue conference gathering opinions of the 3 main type of actors Institut Francais de Recherche pour l`Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER) 5.45
Task 2.5. The “knowledge matrix” = the SWOT analysis obtained after exposing the three pillars for innovation in the Danube Region - to the three main categories of stakeholders GeoEcoMar 5.45
The first three tasks (2.1. 2.2. 2.3.) comprised workshops with the scientific, business and decision making communities and took place in March and May 2014 (M10 and M12).
Task 2.4. Dialogue conference gathering opinions of the 3 main categories of actors
During the Gyor General Assembly (June 2014, Mid Term Review) discussions were held between the WP2 Task coordinators and the WP1 and WP3 leaders to prepare a Dialogue Conference. The discussions, were coordinated by the Task 2.4. Leader (IFREMER), and concluded that a unitary questionnaire covering all the project topics (Research and Innovation Agenda, Research Infrastructure, Education Programme) should be developed by the beginning of Month 14 and distributed widely through Europe and to the participants at the first three events. An on-line questionnaire was put on the project website (http://heras.geoecomar.ro/vot/index.php/776625/lang-en) and distributed by all project partners in Europe, to the main stakeholders. Although the on-line questionnaire was not envisaged in the DoW, it collated material for the Dialogue Conference and for the final WP3 deliverables. At the same meeting the list of participants to be invited to the Dialogue Conference was agreed, focusing on active and interested stakeholders who had attended the previous workshops. Invitations were sent in June 2014 and the Dialogue Conference was held in Bucharest, Romania, on September 8-9, 2014. At the Conference the outcomes from the first three workshops were discussed and a SWOT analysis (the “Knowledge Matrix”) for the Danube Region was completed ( D2.5.).
Task 2.5. The “knowledge matrix”.
During the Dialogue Conference, the main goal was to to obtain a harmonized vision on needs for the Danube Region, as well as the development of the “Knowledge matrix”. After the Conference a draft “Knowledge Matrix” was distributed for further comments and improvements to the project and conference participants, and to other actors from the Danube Region. The Knowledge Matrix was further discussed and improved during the General Assembly held in Vienna in December 2014. There the improved Knowledge Matrix v.2.0 was adopted and considered as basis for the activities in WP3.
Although not originally foreseen, the on-line questionnaire developed to gather supplementary information for the Knowledge Matrix and for WP3 needs was developed in Months 13-14. Over 100 responses were gathered, and the ideas contributed to the proposals from D3.1 – D3.3.
WP 3 - Design of new tools and instruments aiming at boosting knowledge transfer, enhance Research and Innovation cooperation for the environment at the more integrated strategic level
WP3 sought to design tools and instruments to facilitate knowledge and technology transfer – and to enhance research and innovation cooperation.
Summary:
WP focussed on identifying the scientific and technological requirements and innovations necessary to ensure the environmental and ecological security of the Danube-Delta-Black Sea macrosystem. This WP brought together experts from across Europe encompassing skills from the biomolecular/biochemical level through stable- and radioisotope tracing techniques, physical and ecological process characterisation to specialists in quantitative earth observation. All partners had applied experience within the policy arena, conservation and environmental management, regulation and industry.
The tasks of the WP were:
Task 3.1. New tools for boosting science and innovation in the service of industry and policy/decision makers.
Task 3.2. Improved research infrastructure for innovative integrated management of the river-delta-sea macrosystems in the Danube Region.
Task 3.3. Strengthening the human capital in the Danube – Black Sea Macroregion towards the innovative integrated management of river-delta-sea systems.
Each of these tasks is dealt with in the following sections.
A.. DANCERS Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda for the Danube Region
The overarching aim of WP3, in producing a Strategic Agenda for Research and Innovation (SRIA), was to review and evaluate the outcomes and uptake of existing and ongoing research within regional, EU and international scientific projects and initiatives that concern riverine, delta and sea systems. Specifically, the gaps between science and policy were critically reviewed, with particular focus on how research at different scales (local, regional, nation state) or concerned with separate elements of river-delta-sea systems (e.g. river channel or delta or sea) is integrated and could inform society and policy. Additionally, international projects, that were designed to support policy decisions in industrial sectors such as aqua- culture, fisheries, energy, navigation, coastal protection and aggregate extraction (e.g. CONSCIENCE (EU FP6), COEXIST, CORALFISH, MESMA (EU FP7), were closely examined to determine their impact on policy-makers and the relevant industrial sector.
Scientifically coherent solutions for integrated river-basin-sea management require an interdisciplinary approach that is well communicated and able to inform decisions by society, industry and government. The proposed SRIA addresses these research priorities in the context of Pillars and Priority Areas of the EU Strategy for the Danube.
Proposed Research Priorities for the Danube – Black Sea System
A.1 Restoring Ecosystem continuity throughout the DBS System
Two centuries of engineering works have heavily impacted the ecosystems in the Danube River – Danube Delta – NW Black Sea continuum. Dams have cut the longitudinal continuity, while embankments and polder transformation have affected lateral connectivity, notably through the loss of most of Danube floodplains. Science must contribute to the restoration of both longitudinal and lateral connectivity of the various Danube ecosystems by implementing solutions to work with Nature, and not against it.
A.2 Pathways of transport and accumulation of litter(plastic) and pollutants (including emerging pollutants) in the DBS System and their impacts on local ecosystems
The Danube River is responsible for substantial inputs of litter, which accumulates throughout the basin, including in the Danube Delta and the Black Sea. To minimize the litter load, which affects both the freshwater and marine environment, we have to understand the transport and accumulation pathways. This knowledge will support the problem solving at the sources from the entire basin. Innovative waste management schemes should be introduced for regions where such schemes do not exist, in addition to better management of the river outflows in extreme flooding events. These innovative schemes will minimize all categories of litter (meso-, macro-, micro-) and their corresponding effects on the biota with the freshwater, transitional and marine environments.
A.3 Ensuring safe and continuous navigation while restoring the Danube green corridors (with strengthened natural protection from floods)
There is a need to reconcile the demands of navigation with the challenges of environmental restoration in the Lower Danube. Inland navigation and connection with the maritime transport are essential drivers for economic development in the Danube – Black Sea Region as well as worldwide. Dredging is required to ensure a permanent and safe waterway. However, the solutions applied to-date have not achieved sustained navigation during periods of low water flow. Smart and innovative “nature based” solutions that involve the integrated management of sediments and maximize the uses of their ecosystem services are required to ensure continuous navigation and reconcile with the plans of the green corridors development. The results will pioneer the effective management strategies which will have generic value other river-sea systems in Europe and beyond.
A.4 Mutual ecological and economic benefits from ecosystem restoration of eutrophicated ecosystems in the Danube – Black Sea interaction zone
A better understanding is needed of the wider environmental benefits arising from ecosystem restoration in degraded waterbodies. There are potential economic and ecological benefits and trade-offs in, for example, in harvesting plant and algal biomass from transitional eutrophic waters in the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve. This is an underexplored research theme that has applied relevance not just in the Danube Delta, but across the whole of the EU. Other benefits could include nutrient reclamation, water quality remediation, increased recreational value and the exploitation of high-value product. The latter may include, new markets for traditional products, such as reeds. Research is needed to help underpin and advance an agenda that aims to create win-win situations in resource use and ecosystem remediation.
A.5 Dealing with Eutrophication in the Danube – Black Sea interaction zone by using algae as 2nd Generation Biofuels
The recent development of refineries using algae as second generation of biofuels may provide smart and innovative solutions to deal with eutrophication phenomena in the NW Black Sea. Nutrient discharges from the Danube contribute to the explosive development of algal populations in the sea under the influence of the river. Efficient use of the algae as raw materials for biofuel refineries require the profound understanding of freshwater – marine water interactions, variation of nutrient loads supplied by the Danube to the Black Sea, life cycle of algae development and blooming phenomena as well as forecasting of dynamics of the marine area where the algal blooms would evolve. These factors are critical in establishing a performant algae harvesting plan with the double function of providing raw material for biofuels and retention of river-born nutrients from the Black Sea waters.
A.6. Using latest Earth observation (EO) technologies coupled with in situ measurements for an upgraded DBS System environmental monitoring scheme
Capitalising on the launch of ESA’s next generation EO capabilities coupled with in-situ sensor technologies, long term research sites are needed to develop innovative high resolution and long lasting observation systems for transboundary basin scale water management in the Danube system. Effective management of large transboundary river-sea basins such as the Danube is hindered by the lack of standardisation in basin scale monitoring to characterise water quality, changes in biodiversity and hydrology. The development of sensor networks and concerted observation provides the opportunity to overcome these obstacles and provide new insights. Such sensors can also provide a platform to develop novel passive and active sensors to detect emerging pollutants, such as those associated with pharmaceuticals, hospital, industrial and domestic discharges. Sensor networks coupled to biodiversity assessments and combined with Earth observation data, exploiting next generation platforms from ESA’s Sentinel programme, and complex numerical modelling are likely to provide new understandings of the fate and impact of these pollutants, responses of organisms and the hydrological connectivity and functioning of the Danube River-Delta-Black Sea. Such an approach will facilitate more effective regulation and management to mitigate against the impact of pollutants on aquatic ecosystems and society.
A.7 Developing sustainable agricultural practices (crops, husbandry) while obtaining good water quality in the DBS System
The EU Common Agricultural Policy aims to provide sufficient and safe quantities of food by applying latest scientific and technological innovations in regulation and management practices that protect the environment. One of the biggest challenges is to implement this goal in very large areas, such as the Danube River Basin. Innovative methods are needed to achieve this goal whilst also obtaining good water quality in the Danube River – Danube Delta – NW Black Sea.
A.8 Understanding river-sea interaction processes in the Danube Delta transitional environments
Implementing European policies in transitional environments needs to be undertaken within a framework that allows for a better understanding of their functioning to maximise the benefits of their implementation and minimise any detrimental impacts on ecosystems, society and water quality. Several European policies connect in transitional areas in the river-sea continua, such as estuaries, deltas, lagoons and other coastal wetlands, such as WFD, MSFD, Flood Directive, and ICZM. A fundamental understanding of the functioning of the complex, dynamic and vulnerable transitional environments and their relation to social and economic aspects as well as to global change, are the basis for more effective management and thus make better use of the potential of the afore mentioned policies. A true holistic and interdisciplinary approach is needed to significantly increase our understanding of these transitional systems.
A.9 Managing dams and reservoir lakes as critical sediment traps and bottlenecks for river habitats continuity in the DBS System
Dams act as traps, interrupting the natural flow and continuum of water, sediments and biota. As a result they contribute to changes in ecosystems and the considerable accumulation of sediments in the related barrage lakes. Pollutants also accumulate in these lakes, transforming them into potential ecological „time bombs”. Detailed knowledge and inventory of these sediments along with their potential ecological impacts of any contaminant is needed along with an estimate of the accumulation and migration processes to develop adequate sediment bypassing solutions to prevent critical environmental incidents.
A.10 Restoring natural habitats in the Danube floodplains – Danube Delta and lagoon systems as support for fisheries revival.
Destroying floodplains and their associated wetlands and closing the Danube Delta lagoons, have been some of the critical factors in the failure of the fisheries in the Danube River – Danube Delta – Black Sea system. Plans to support fisheries revival and sustainable aquaculture must include actions to restore the spawning grounds and nursery habitats for native fish and other aquatic species, increasing the exchange of water and resources between channel and floodplain, and using this connectivity to increase ecosystem resilience to external drivers such as climate change and invasion.
A.11 Understanding Climate change impacts on the DBS System by applying the latest generation of models
Climate change will have differing impacts throughout the Danube River – Danube Delta – Black Sea system. The latest generation of climate models are invaluable tools to enable us to understand the impacts and prepare detailed adaptation and mitigation management plans. To understand the impacts of climate change, records of the thermal dynamics in lakes, lagoons and flowing waters is required to understand the impacts of climate change. Where historical records are missing, some reconstruction of surface water temperatures along with other essential climate variables (ECVs) is possible from Earth observation data.
A.12 Managing water resources for human use by implementing new technologies for water abstraction, purification, distribution, collection, treatment and reuse in the DBS System
There are considerable uncertainties concerning the flux and storage of carbon from the headwaters of the Danube, through large alluvial river-floodplain reaches in the middle of the catchment, to the freshwater – marine transitional zone of the Danube Delta and the Black Sea. For example, floodplain wetlands in the Danube and its tributaries can potentially function as both a carbon store and a carbon sink, and where closely integrated with river systems they can represent an important source of carbon for the Black Sea, albeit with considerable seasonal variation. Fluxes of dissolved organic matter (DOM) from wetlands are the largest and most bioavailable pool of fluvial DOM, which affect the transport of organic pollutants, particle surface and colloid chemistry, photochemistry of natural waters and nutrient availability in freshwater systems. DOM also contributes to chemical processes in natural water bodies by altering surface-water acidity, and affecting metal speciation and ion-exchange between the water and sediment phase. Significantly, to-date DOM has been relatively poorly studied across the freshwater – marine transitional zone in the Danube Delta: DOM is generally likely to be dominated in the headwaters of the Danube by inputs of terrestrially-derived DOM and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations are high; while the controls on DOM downstream are often related to the rate of water movement. However, the subsequent transformation of DOM in freshwater – marine transitional zone within the Delta is uncertain, yet this knowledge is fundamental to closing the carbon cycle.
A.13 Harmonising scientific data and monitoring protocols in the DBS System
Integrated management of the DBS system can be successfully implemented only by fully understanding the upstream – sea continuum and by having compatible and harmonized indicators of state. This requires a harmonisation of monitoring protocols in the freshwater, transitional and marine components of the system. Ultimately, the aim should be to generate robust quality data to inform and enable efficient and effective management across the Danube basin. Harmonization and optimization of sampling approaches and monitoring systems and protocols needs careful attention, with respect to the adoption of standard methods and co-ordination of monitoring scales.
A.14 Unfolding the cultural heritage potential of the DBS System by using scientific tools
The strategic location and natural resources of this region has made it attractive to settlers for millennia. As a result the area is known to contain a wealth of historic and prehistoric sites. This important cultural resource is also threatened by land use change, development and significantly climate change. Remote sensing coupled with geo-archaeology has the potential to uncover cultural heritage sites. Such approaches could inform future management of these cultural landscapes and the sites they contain to ensure their continued preservation. The OECD has identified cultural tourism as one of the fastest growing global tourism markets. Regional tourism could take advantage of these tools and new cultural heritage objectives to sustainably develop new attractions and business opportunities.
A.15 Reducing future risks of invasive species in the DBS System
Understanding potential dispersal pathways for invasive species and factors that influence their success is critical. Invasive species have benefited from human-disturbed systems, including introduction of hard substrate, altered nutrient regimes, or altered food web structure. The potentially devastating impact invasive species may have on the DBS system must be reduced by (i) exhaustive risk management plans dealing with all human activities that may represent future routes of introduction and transmission and (ii) by identifying the attributes of native communities that promote resilience to invasion.
A.16 Interdisciplinary scientific support for the successful implementation of the Sturgeon 2020 Flagship Project in the DBS System
Interdisciplinary research integrating environmental and socio-economic issues is needed for the successful and sustainable implementation of the Sturgeon 2020 Flagship Project of the EUSDR. Existing projects and programmes must be coordinated to focus on solve the most important uncertainties and critical questions related to the restoration of the sturgeon populations, raising awareness and broader understanding of communities and the development of new economic opportunities related to aquaculture and conservation of sensitive environments in the DBS system.
A.17 The DBS System Atlas
Decision support systems covering in an exhaustive way the entire DBS system are major tools to be used by all managers. An electronic atlas should provide harmonized layers of information from the physical and environmental aspects to land use, activities and social issues. The atlas would thus provide a critical support to understand the effects of the development and implementation of various policies.
A.18 Innovative means to harness water energy in the DBS System
Harnessing energy from water and other renewable sources in a way that does not significantly affect ecosystems is a major issue for the DBS system. Innovative engineering schemes are needed for an effective energy generation, from the river water flow to the marine waves and currents. Specific cogeneration devices alternatively using energy from wind, water and solar sources are needed to solve the critical problem of constant supply.
A.19 Promoting Cross Border Environmental Stewardship in the DBS System through Citizen Science
Systematic and timely monitoring of large river-sea systems with complex geopolitical histories remains challenging. Monitoring these waters in the DBS Sea is restricted by economic and logistical constraints. These constraints include the lack of cross-border harmonisation in monitoring and management at the catchment scale. Engaging citizens in the role of monitoring through the development of citizen observatories can change the monitoring paradigm whilst also empowering citizens in governance and their environmental awareness. A number of emerging technologies, including smart-phones and inexpensive sensors which can be widely distributed now provide the framework for effective monitoring of water quality. Data streams from both citizen science projects and earth observation sensors can be used in research and education. This is particularly helpful in understanding the connectivity between the landscape and surface waters at high spatial and temporal resolution and at a catchment scales, and in forming a cohesive and connected region among citizens and managers across the widely diverse histories and cultures in the region. In addition to delivering a step change in environmental monitoring, this approach can also promote the aspiration of citizen- based environmental stewardship.
A.20 Cross-cutting SRIA activities in the DBS System
Establishment of a Steering Body compriseing senior scientists and stakeholders from across the region and with backgrounds in education, research, industry, government and environmental management and protection is required to promote the SRIA. Development of a roadmap for either individual, or a combination of research priorities, to include monitoring of progress and assessment of the impact resulting from the publication of the SRIA. Planned revision of priorities after 5 years to re-assess their relevance to the DBS System and in the context of scientific advances and changes in funding directions.
B. Detailed plans and concepts for a new regional research infrastructure in the field of integrated river- delta – sea management in the Danube – Black Sea area
This is an opportune time to address the challenges, identified above, by a cross- disciplinary distributed Research Infrastructure (RI) on freshwater – marine systems. The RI can potentially build upon the world- leading capabilities of the European environmental science community to deliver the necessary step-change in our understanding.
The initiative to develop a RI in the Danube River Basin and Black Sea is further enhanced by the coincidence of the following factors:
i. Political framework including EUSDR and ESFRI.
ii. Timeliness of technical advances (analytical capabilities – eg. mass spectrometry, DNA e-sequencing, satellites sensors, mesocosms, numerical modelling, smart sensor networks)
iii. Resource exploitation
iv. European e-infrastructures initiatives (Geant & PRACE)
v. Existence of the GEOSS and the COPERNICUS programmes
It is important to look forward and consider the degree to which the research needs identified in Section 2 (SWOT analysis and conclusions from DANCERS workshops) and the opportunities summarised in Section 3, can be addressed by the two new EUSDR flagship research initiatives in the Danube – Black Sea system (River, Delta and Sea). Together these initiatives (DREAM and DANUBIUS-RI) have the potential to provide world-leading facilities that will facilitate inter-disciplinary research in the Danube - Black Sea system. Both projects will build capacity and will benefit from active engagement with the European research community.
B.1 DANUBIUS-RI (International Centre for Advanced Studies on River-Sea Systems)
DANUBIUS-RI seeks to provide a world-leading RI to enable interdisciplinary research on freshwater – marine systems. In so doing it aims to identify and implement solutions to reconcile conflicting human uses within several river-sea systems in Europe, comprising the Danube - Black Sea. These solutions require a holistic basin approach (from source to the sea), that spans the Danube – Black Sea system.
The RI will comprise a Hub, Supersites, Nodes, a Data Centre and Technology Transfer Office. Project co-ordination will be the responsibility of the Hub, situated in the Danube Delta, Romania. The infrastructure will be linked by the DANUBIUS Commons: a set of harmonized methods, protocols, instruments data acqui- sition and management to ensure quality assured and comparable data acquired across DANUBIUS-RI, to guarantee the consistency and quality of scientific output.
Supersites (field laboratories) are planned for the Danube River – Black Sea system at: (i) the Danube Delta (Romania); (ii) the Danube River at Szigetköz (Hungary) investigating surface-groundwater interactions; and (iii) Lake Lunz (Austria) focusing on the effects of climate change on aquatic ecosystems. Figure 1 illustrates the site for the Hub, distribution of the supersites and nodes.
Nodes are key thematic facilities based on institutions with world-leading facilities and expertise, will ensure disciplinary rigour. Although located outside the Danube Region (Observation: Plymouth Marine Laboratory, UK; Analysis: BfG, Germany; Modelling: ISMAR, Italy; Social/Economic: Deltares, Netherlands), they will work to build capability and capacity across Europe including the Danube Region. They will do this by appointing other laboratories (Accredited Service Providers) in the Danube Basin that conform to the DANUBIUS Commons and meet a need in the provision of facilities and services.
DANUBIUS-RI provides a unique opportunity to bring together European expertise and facilities with an internationally leading focus on understanding, characterising and managing freshwater and marine systems globally. Opportunities provided by research in the natural laboratory of the Danube – Black Sea system, will be maximised by building capacity with a new RI with wider engagement from European researchers and insti- tutions. This exemplar will provide research outputs that will be transferrable to other river – sea systems globally.
B.2 DREAM (Danube River Research and Management)
DREAM aims to improve research infrastructure in the Danube basin in order to develop measures to improve the actual situation in river engineering, flood risk management, hydropower, navigation and protecting the Danube River ecosystems. It envisages the construction of two new laboratories in Romania and Austria, the upgrade of existing laboratories throughout the DRB, the development of a network that spans the joint usage (and application) of numerical models, the installation and running of field study sites, and the construction of a research vessel. DREAM furthermore seeks to foster improved cooperation between research organisations in the Danube basin as well as research groups based outside the region.
There is an urgent need to integrate use and protection of the Danube River in a sustainable way. Research is of fundamental importance to derive monitoring strategies, modelling and engineering solutions to improve measures suited to reach a win-win situation between economic use and environmental protection of the Danube River. This will be strongly related to the Danube River Basin Management Plan (Figure 3).
Figure 3. DREAM EUSDR Research Infrastructure proposed architecture. Map showing the location of the proposed new facilities to be developed (situation September 2014).
DREAM will provide an improvement of research infrastructure and cooperation between research institutions in the Danube basin. The two new laboratories combined with existing ones offer unique possibility for large- scale physical laboratory investigation allowing fundamental and applied research. One is situated in the Upper Danube in Vienna. It uses the water level difference between the Danube and the Danube Canal of 3 m to reach a laboratory providing free flowing discharge of up to 10 m³/s. This will be a unique facility in Europe. The focus of research will be steeper slope reaches, coarse sediment transport interacting with flood risk ma- nagement, hydropower, navigation and ecology, thus the Upper and Middle Danube are mainly investigated there. The Romanian new Laboratory will concentrate on low slope and fine grained sediment transport, including the Deltaic and estuarine conditions.
DREAM provides an umbrella and the infrastructure for a set of research topics. These topics are intercon- nected and cover several disciplines, from basic research, to be represented by advanced hydraulic laboratories and sophisticated 3D models on high computational technology, to applied research, providing field data to mitigate hydrological extremes and to improve existing situations in water regimes, sediment regime, flood risk, drought problems, hydropower, revision of bio-engineering measures, restoration of streams and flood plains, etc.
The DREAM partnership includes all Danube River Basin Countries and further research institutions outside the basin.
B3 Proposed partnership
The partnership between the two flagship projects aims to fulfil the needs of the region. DANUBIUS-RI and DREAM are complementary RI projects: while they have different objectives, there are areas of interface, and potential synergy, between the two flagship projects. DREAM focusses on hydrodynamics, sediment trans- port, river morphodynamics, flood risk management and engineering in the Danube River basin. DANUBIUS-RI has a wide disciplinary scope (physical, chemical, biological, social and economic sciences) and covers not only the Danube - Black Sea macrosystem but other large European River-Sea systems. The two projects have a number of partner organisations in common across Europe. The opportunities for partnership include:
• collaboration and sharing of field sites (DREAM field study sites; DANUBIUS-RI Supersites and other field sites) in the Danube River basin;
• use of DANUBIUS-RI facilities in the Danube Delta, and elsewhere, for DREAM activities;
• use of DREAM facilities for DANUBIUS-RI activities;
• collection and sharing of data using the same protocols;
• facilities provided by both facilities to be used for research on the main common point of interest - dynamics of sediments in the Danube – Black Sea;
• DANUBIUS-RI Data Centre will provide support on request to DREAM;
• DREAM facility in Vienna has the potential to become a Node of DANUBIUS-RI on river hydraulics, or establish a clear agreement to cover this role; and
• DANUBIUS-RI Technological Transfer Office will support specific requests coming from the DREAM project.
B.4 Means of cooperation, data accessibility
It is important that DANUBIUS-RI and DREAM develop and maintain a close level of cooperation on all major topics, from strategic research directions to data sharing, joint projects, and agreements towards common use of several facilities. This cooperation is helped by several key participant institutions from Roma- nia (GeoEcoMar – coordinating the ESFRI process of DANUBIUS-RI) and Austria (WCL, BOKU) being present in both RI initiatives.
Ongoing collaboration is ensured by DREAM representatives being invited to participate in the DANUBIUS- RI ESFRI Preparatory Phase (subsequent to the access on the 2016 ESFRI Roadmap). DANUBIUS-RI repre- esentatives are participating in the DREAM project meetings. These joint actions will contribute to the final and detailed decision to strengthen the long lasting collaboration between the two RIs.
B.5 Implementation strategy and funding sources
DANUBIUS-RI: After obtaining ESFRI status, DANUBIUS-RI will be eligible for Structural Funds. Romania dedicated a chapter for the building of the Hub from Structural Funds – the Competitiveness Operational Programme (for RIs) 2014 – 2020 – and part of the facilities to be developed in the Danube Delta as DREAM - Romania are eligible here. Structural funds and national funding in all European countries hosting parts of DANUBIUS-RI are available for construction, and such funds were already identified under adequate Smart Specialisation Strategies in each EU country where Nodes and Supersites are being developed. National funds and other sources are also sought where necessary to supplement the financial resources, both for construction and for operation.
DREAM: DREAM aims to use all funding opportunities in the Danube Region, from national to specific programmes and structural funds. The CBC (Cross Border Cooperation) Programmes existing between all the DREAM consortium countries are excellent opportunities to build most of the hard infrastructure required for the project.
The newly launched programme DANUBE is crucial for both projects and may become a major funding source to continue the already established collaboration.
C Human Capital Development Programme
The proposal for the education agenda is achieved through an analysis of the gaps and opportunities for an integrated approach towards a better alignment of international education and Human Resource development in the Danube Basin. Developments in the Danube – Black Sea system macro-region include a number of initiatives and activities from before and after the 1990s (the fall of the Iron Curtain). In this context, the document reflects on the challenges including access to education programmes, new developments (including the credit transfer system) and the language requirements necessary for more substantial international co-operation. The document reflects on stakeholder opinions and provides a general discussion of the existing programs in the field of higher education and professional training. Based on the presented challenges and opportunities with which the educational needs are faced, DANCERS proposes a model for a new Danube educational programme that could lead to a better integration of the river-delta-sea management practices. In principle, the new Danube education programme has at its core a pyramid base and approach that aims to address different levels of education.
The main aim of such a programme is to build a network of institutions and to develop agreements and mecha-nisms to facilitate the exchange of experts, students and scientists at the following educational levels within the Danube Basin.
C.1 Technicians
One big challenge of the EUSDR is the difference in educational structure between individual countries, i.e. regarding professional education and chances on the job market (oead´news 1/94 p. 23). To facilitate exchange of personnel it is necessary to ensure a high level of quality in basic training; standardised methods; and promote exchange of know-how on an advanced level. Therefore, technicians should be encouraged to visit labs for short term hands on training courses, helping to foster technical cooperation between research centres and industries. Also, it is crucial to grant internationally recognised certificates for participants of the training courses.
Relevant course contents could include e.g. measuring water quantity (discharge, sediment transport) and water quality parameters (quality assurance/quality control practices), data acquisition, storage and preparation of samples, generation of regulatory data, calibration and maintenance of lab and field equipment, conducting data management including statistical analyses and field sampling etc.
C.2 Undergraduate students
The international network should embolden bachelor students to spend one or two semesters, or to undertake research projects, at a partner institution in the Danube Black Sea system (academia and industry sector), to gain international experience.
On bachelor level, there is a large range of possibilities for international exchange in Danube – Black Sea system. What is missing is a clearly arranged platform that gives a complete overview.
There should also be a strengthening of a Danube Basin undergraduate student exchange programme and an offering of specific undergraduate Danube related special courses. These courses range e.g. from fundamental subjects like environmental science, geomorphology, hydraulics, hydrology, sediment transport, ecology, social and political science courses to an integrated water and river management.
C.3 Postgraduate students (MSc)
Master Students exchange is of utmost importance to the future improvement of the Danube River Basin Man- agement since many alumni will work later in governmental organisations like Ministries, Water Authorities, Consulting Companies (planning measures to improve the water management situation in the Basin) or the Private Sector (e.g. Hydropower Companies, Navigation sector). Thus there is a direct impact of the education improvement on water and river management.
By strengthening a Danube Basin postgraduate student exchange programme and offering of specific postgraduate Danube related special courses these goals should be reachable.
One element could be a newly developed Master´s programme based on the following topics:
• Ecology and limnology, including assessment methods, restoration and management schemes, etc;
• Hydrology and hydraulics, from theory to practical application
• Sustainable water management, including e.g. sustainable flood protection, hydro-power, navigation,
• River preservation and restoration, sustainable water use for irrigation; and
• Socioeconomics, including ecotourism.
The programme should include an obligation for an internship/apprenticeship in a research institute or in industry. For the further development also see “Guidelines for Curriculum Development and Quality Assur- ance of Joint Master Programmes” (Euroleague for Life Sciences).
C.4 Postgraduate students (PhD)
A further goal is to facilitate an international exchange of Danube Basin PhDs, aiming at exchanging and assimilating know-how between countries/institutions and advancing knowledge by either taking specific, specialised modules or undertaking specific credit bearing research projects (e.g. PhD thesis, scientific projects) in a host institution or jointly. Also, the jointly use of research facilities would enhance exchange and knowledge transfer and could be an eligible development considering limited financial and material resources.
To meet these challenges and needs in education, we propose that CASEE, Danube Rectors’ Conference (DRC), the European Academy of Science and the Black Sea Universities Network (BSUN) should be integrated to work on a Danube specific programme, to enhance the efforts and implement it. Also, it is proposed to seek pan-European funding and supervisors with key expertise distributed across the region to capitalise on the expertise available. CEEPUS (the “Central European Exchange Program for University Stud- ies”) could serve as a model programme.
Based on these models the establishment of a Danube Basin PhD programme should be initiated. Furthermore the development of a Danube education cooperation strategy should be initiated.
C5 Scientists:
Finally, the proposed Danube education programme also includes the scientists, from PostDocs, junior to senior lecturers to full professors. In this field a joint teaching and research program and a scientist exchange strategy among the Danube – Black Sea system universities is envisaged. In order to reach these goals the following roadmap could be followed: In a conference scientists of the whole Danube – Black Sea system, dealing with water and river – delta – coastal sea research, could meet and discuss ways and strategies to estab- lish a joint and fully complementary teaching and research program. The conference would establish working groups that would be initiated with specific tasks that cover both strategic teaching and research areas. Within a period of two years a concrete strategy should be available as draft version, to be discussed and adopted in a final conference. In parallel, means to improve the flow and exchange of scientists and expertise between different Danube Region universities should be constructed. The DRC and BSUN should be involved so that there exist at the end direct implementation ideas that allow the realisation.
C.6 Lifelong learning
Across Europe the importance of providing lifelong learning is increasingly recognised and can take many forms: in academic institutions, in places of employment, at home (distance learning) and through leisure activities. At one level, lifelong learning can facilitate retraining of individuals, providing a more flexible labour force. It also enables individuals to develop their knowledge and technical expertise to adapt to changing requirements of the labour market and fulfil the requirement of continuous professional development. It is important to acknowledge that this also applies to administrators and managers (Table 5.5) as well as scientists.
In the UK (NIACE, 2009: www.niace.org.uk) a recent review of lifelong learning advocates a 4-stage model: i. up to 25; ii. 25–50; iii. 50–75, and iv. 75+. While people in the first stage may learn as ‘young people, in the second stage, lifelong learning can sustain productivity and prosperity. Training and education opportunities are also important in stage 3, to facilitate retraining, but increasingly, stage 4 is becoming important in delivering an appropriate curriculum in later life.
A major request that came out during the DANCERS workshop with the managers and administrators in May 2014 regarded a stronger and more intensive lifelong learning system. All participants required to have systematic intensive training, during which to be instructed in the latest scientific updates / available tools.
Depending on the type of managers and administrators as well as the field of interest three professional training programmes are proposed:
• Specialised courses related to a certain field of expertise (e.g. river hydraulics, coastal dynamics, Sediment transport, flood risk management)
• Summer schools consisting of a theoretical and practical part.
• Masters courses as programs that are run in parallel to the job
Specialised courses related to a certain field of expertise would be offered by a specific University covering a needed subject. Summer schools could be offered by several universities and be implemented at a special location, eventually close to the Danube River and the Danube Delta / Black Sea coast (depending also on the topic). There, theory and practical work should be included to allow an easier transfer from basic research to application.
A third suggestion is the development of a Masters course as a programme in parallel to employment, meaning that the courses would have to take place in the evening, on weekends or during job releases. It could be envisaged that this could be a special Danube - Black Sea Masters programme. These courses or schools should result in certified diplomas.
Potential Impact:
Research and innovation programmes should respond to the socio-economic needs of the European Union and its Member States and Associated Countries. Today, these countries are facing complex challenges that will shape our common future. Top issues include a sustainable supply of food and energy, securing jobs and economic prosperity, ensuring human health for aging populations.
The DANCERS deliverables will contribute to the development of greener, smarter economies, central components of the new “Europe 2020” Strategy, the EU's knowledge-based growth strategy for the next decade. DANCERS is particularly relevant for the EU Strategy for Danube Region but also for the flagship initiatives: Innovation Union, An Industrial Policy for the Globalization of ERA and Resource Efficient Europe are particularly relevant.
The three final Deliverables of the project will be further implemented at national and regional level. The Romanian Academy has already started the integration of the DANCERS deliverables into its national strategy for development of education and scientific research at the time horizon of 2035. In the Academy Project 8 (Danube Research), the Knowledge Matrix (DANCERS Deliverable 2.5 introduced in Policy Brief 1), has been the basis for the SWOT analysis of research in the Lower Danube – re. Romanian institutions (see http://www.academiaromana.ro/bdar/strategiaAR/doc11/Strategia.pdf - pag. 353-354). DANCERS is the instrument that will allow several organisations in Danube Region to contribute to the establishment of the most advanced Program (in terms of education – research – knowledge transfer) = basis for a future distributed Research Infrastructure which will be dedicated to all the aspects regarding the advanced studies for the integrated management of the Danube – Danube Delta -– Black Sea macrosystem. After the design of the nodes to become part of this distributed infrastructure, its construction will be funded by EU from Structural Funds while day-to-day operation will be ensured by its funding members.
Furthermore, as the Black Sea is the final part of this macro-system, the implementation of DANCERS will help strengthen the EU position as major player in its Eastern Neighbourhood, attracting young brilliant scientists from Black Sea riparian Countries (e.g. Georgia, Ukraine, etc.). Offering solutions for river-delta-sea macrosystems will attract also scientists from the Black Sea Region involved in other river-delta-sea macrosystems, such as the Kura – Aras river and delta basin, from the Black to the Caspian Sea (Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan). The impacts of this broader pan-EU participation in DANCERS may be seen as major steps forward in addressing several of the European Union Strategy for the Danube Region, besides the PA 10 (To step up institutional capacity and cooperation ). The Scientific R&I Agenda will bring major contributions to: PA7 (To develop the Knowledge Society (research, education and ICT), PA5 To manage environmental risks), PA6 (To preserve biodiversity, landscapes and the quality of air and soils), PA 4 (To restore and maintain the quality of waters ), also the navigation aspects of PA1A (To improve mobility and intermodality of inland waterways). The educational espects of WP3 will have a significant impact on PA9 (To invest in people and skills), while the development of plans by connecting with the business community will certainly impact also on PA 8 (To support the competitiveness of enterprises).
The subsequent developments of DANCERS (R&D infrastructure plus the education programme plus the strategic agenda) could become a truly international pole of excellence in science and innovation. This will support “brain gain” in Europe by attracting the most talented young students and researchers from the Black Sea riparian countries and strengthening ties between the scientific communities from their EU and the Black Sea region.
The DANCERS dissemination plan was based on a framework structure for facilitating the transfer of results and cooperation, starting by the general structure for communication and outreach to the scientific community, the Administration community and the general public. This was necessary due to the character of the Danube-Black Sea system territory, which is mostly public domain and, therefore, managed by one or more public Administrations. The general public dimension is motivated by the fact that a high percentage of the population lives in the Danube-Black Sea (DBS) system and therefore the project outcomes aim to contribute to decrease the level of conflict and risk in that area.
Main dissemination activities
Dissemination activities were specifically oriented towards industries, policy and decision makers, and the scientific community. The dissemination tools were press releases and policy briefs, together with scientific publications and the project’s website. Press releases were scheduled every 6 months. Several of these have been uploaded to the project’s website by GeoEcoMar. Regarding scientific publications, the possibility arose through the University of Stirling (WP3 coordinators) of publishing a Special Issue of the Science of the Total Environment based on reviews of natural and anthropogenic impacts upon river-delta-sea systems, further along in the project.
We have produced papers, communications and news resulting in contributions to illustrate the variety of challenges faced at several coexisting scales by vulnerable riverine and coastal systems, with emphasis on the DBS system. We have disseminated our approach and results to representative forums and conferences in all the disciplines that converge in a catchment basin considered in a holistic manner.
a) Press releases
For the wider transmission of results, to reach private and public parties increasingly using the social network channels, we intend to provide short answers to the questions or interests of users, focusing on authorities and decision makers (at local to regional and global levels) plus users and stakeholders from all economic sectors converging in catchment basins.
b) Scientific publications and conferences
The main element of this dissemination is the collection of 12 scientific papers submitted to the Science of Total Environment as a special issue from the project.
This collection of papers consists of:
i) Two introductory papers dealing with the historic development of research in the DBS system (Hein et al) and with the education for action aligned with sustainable development policies in the Danube river basin (Irvine et al).
ii) This is followed by a collection of papers dealing with specific aspects of the Danube system: sediment dynamics and tectonics (Matenco et al), restoration options for flood plains (Hein et al), evolution of fish and fauna (Curtean-Banaduc et al), and plan resources in the Danube delta (Luminita et al).
iii) The next block consists of several papers dealing with integrated river basin management (Habersak et al), water quality management (Chapman et al) and adapting coastal environments to climate change (Sanchez-Arcilla et al). This block introduces wider dimensions than the DBS system region but is closely linked to this area.
iv) The final block consists of papers analysing earth observation capabilities for inland, transitional and shelf sea waters (Tyler et al) and the characterization of ecosystem services based on water sediment and biology (Politi et al).
v) The collection of papers is completed with an illustration of how to assess risk based on biological tools (Bratosin et al).
The structured collection of papers described above is supplemented by a production of papers presented at conferences dealing with specific aspects related to the DBS system or presenting a comparison with the macro region with other systems somehow represented in the partnership. This can be illustrated by the communication on carbon and nutrient dynamics in altered riverine landscapes (Hein et al 2014), on the evaluation of transient measures against storms (Garcia-Leon et al 2015) and on climate change and coastal sustainability implications (Sanchez-Arcilla et al 2015). The effect of climate change on various system components (e.g. Sanchez-Arcilla et al 2015) and the importance of scaling (Hein et al 2015) have also been considered.
In a similar manner, the project approach and linkage between groups and disciplines has been presented at a number of meetings such as ICPDR-2013 in Vienna, ACDR-2014 in Vienna, ASLO-2015 in Granada and Hydro-Echo 2015 in Vienna. To this we should add the linked presentations in Coastal Sediments 2015 in San Diego to illustrate the international dimension of the transfer. A sample illustration of the conferences in which DANCERS has been disseminated is given in table 3.
Within this scientific activity it has to be highlighted the ongoing PhD research between the University of Stirling and GeoEcoMar on the “Reconstructing Changes in Sediment Flux from the Danube into the Black Sea through Earth Observation, Hydrodynamic Modelling and Sediment Coring”, the main aim of which is to characterize the sediment transfer from the Danube catchment through the Danube Delta to inner shelf of the western Black Sea.
In addition to the Special Issue, the CIIRC and GeoEcoMar teams have been working on three papers related to the project. The first two attempt to identify and characterize similar current pulses (intensifications of the order of two days) observed at two coastal sites (Danube delta and Catalan coast), to determine their causes and possible implications.
a) Website metrics
The analytics of the webpage of the project, taken from the 1st of February 2014 to the 22th of May 2015, has been used as a measure of the media dissemination of the DANCERS contents. Annex IV presents a detailed description of all the related metric variables.
As it was initially expected, Romania tops the list by country (see figure 4) that have visited the webpage; however, English is the dominant language used within the webpage. The second in the ranking of countries is the USA with 544 visits, which indicates the success of the dissemination done until now. Most of the other countries in the list belong to the DBS system (44%) and also serve to show the interest the project has aroused in society (understood here as the whole spectra). Moreover, all continents are represented in the list of established sessions and in this sense it is an indicator of the high degree of dissemination achieved. As expected, English, Romanian and DBS system languages are the languages used to visit the webpage of the project. Another important aspect is the fact that about a third of those who visited the site returned which clearly indicates their interest in following the progress of the project.
Summary
The dissemination plan, progressively refined during the project development, has been based on the following elements:
i) Building and maintaining (during the project development) a web page to “disseminate” project activities as well as socially “punching” results (like the database).
ii) A leaflet/poster/roll-up and specific flyer has been distributed among scientific institutions, public administrations and potential end-users.
iii) Producing a number of high-quality (peer-reviewed) scientific papers in relevant journals including a Special Issue of Science of the Total Environment and conferences fcovering the river and coastal communities as well as the ecology, engineering, management or inter-disciplinary groups interested in the future of the DBS system.
iv) Communicating the project achievements in a non-scientific terminology to the river/coastal communities at local/regional levels, using the press, TV and the corresponding services of the participant universities/institutions.
v) Transferring the project results in a decision support context (seminars, webinars and workshops) to the public bodies and Agencies with management responsibilities (river, coastal, deltaic authorities) and the private “users” of the value of integrated information approach.
List of Websites:
http://www.dancers-fp7.eu/
project coordinator: dr. Adrian Stanica
National Institute of Marine Geology and Geoecology – GEOECOMAR
Str. Dimitrie Onciul, Nr. 23-25, RO-024053
e-mail: astanica@geoecomar.ro
This document summarises the main outputs of the project: DANube macroregion: Capacity building and Excellence in River Systems (basin, delta and sea) (DANCERS) which aims to develop new instruments and tools for environmental research in the Danube Region. The project envisaged that these instruments should build upon existing national, regional and European projects. Hence DANCERS has critically analysed what has been achieved so far in the region to design innovative solutions to strengthen knowledge transfer in this area. This has been accomplished through meetings between representatives of the academic and business communities and decision makers, interested in advancing integrated management of the Danube –Black Sea system.
The main deliverable of DANCERS has been a toolbox of instruments, that include (1) a strategic research agenda; (2) plans of a distributed research infrastructure for the Danube – Black Sea system; and (3) Proposals for an integrated educational program.
The project final deliverables are openly accessible on the project website www.dancers-fp7.eu
Project Context and Objectives:
Recent geopolitical changes (the fall of communism in Central and Eastern Europe), the disintegration of the USSR in 1991 and creation of the European Union in 1994, have created the essential pre-conditions to develop environmental research programmes that for the first time, can span the entirety of the Danube Region (as defined in EU Strategy for Danube Region). Here, the Danube – Black Sea is envisaged as a single and integrated macrosystem given the need to consider the Danube in its entirety including its impacts and interactions with society from its source to the western Black Sea.
To achieve the project aims (to develop new instruments to enhance environmental research), DANCERS focussed the three pillars of Research and Innovation (i. Science and Innovation Agenda; ii. Research Infrastructures; and iii. Human Capital) – and their relation to three categories of stakeholder (i. Policy and Decision Makers; ii. Business / Industry community; and iii. Academia).
The project objectives were to:
• Critically analyse achievements in integrated river – delta – sea management in the Danube – Black Sea placing them within the wider international context
• Identify strong and weak areas of regional environmental research
• Define a set of instruments to enhance environmental research and innovation in the Danube Region
The final deliverable of DANCERS was a toolbox of instruments, specifically:
1. A Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda to 2020 and beyond (SRIA)
2. A concept and detailed plan of the two existing distributed research infrastructures in the region which are currently EU Flagship Projects and which are required to implement the SRIA
3. Proposals for an integrated educational programme (EDU).
Most of the important players from countries involved in Priority Area 7 of the Action Plan of the EU Strategy for the Danube Region are also members of the DANCERS consortium.
Project Results:
The DANCERS philosophy foresaw that all activities should be grouped according to the following order: screening what has been performed so far in the Danube Region (WP1), understanding which are the strong and weak points, which are the positive examples and what is further needed (WP2) and the toolbox od instruments, as final deliverables (WP3). This is why the introduction to the S&T results presents the activities performed in each WP.
WP 1 - Mapping of national, EU and international projects/programmes/initiatives (including results) related to research and innovation in the fluvial – deltaic – coastal environments within the Danube - Black Sea Macrosystem.
WP1 gathered together existing information on projects and programs on water management in the Danube region. In doing so, the WP drew upon the recent Danube River Basin Management Plan (ICPDR 2009), and focussed on the three main domains: life sciences (including environmental aspects), earth sciences and socio-economics. The work was undertaken at a variety of levels (national, regional, European, International organizations) and was structured into the three main pillars: Scientific Agenda, Research& Infrastructure and Human Capital.
Summary
The projects and programs were collected, firstly using an online questionnaire and secondly via an internet search.
A project metadatabase was constructed using the open source software geoNetwork. This was designed to satisfy the objectives of WP1, and subsequent WPs. Hence the main purpose of the metadata base was:
• to provide structured information to assess the collected projects,
• to improve data access and
• to promote the sharing of obtained knowledge.
The DANCERS metadatabase server is accessible via http://wcl-geo.boku.ac.at/geonetwork/srv/eng/search or via the project website (username: guest, password: DANCERS
In total 478 projects are listed in the metadatabase (status: May 2015). Production of the database was a key task of the first project year, however, the metadatabase remained active in the second project year. Further questionnaires were returned and imported (the last questionnaire returned in December 2014) and additional projects were entered manually (the last direct entry performed in April 2015).
Figure 1 Server Statistics showing the number of project hits
The server statistics show that in the second project year (May 2014 to May 2015) >7400 hits were logged from 16 different nations (see Fig 1). The metadatabase will remain active for at least 12 months after the project end.
Table 1 Summary of tasks in WP1
Task no. Task name Responsible Institution Resources (months)
Task 1.1 Setup of a metadatabase according to the data collected and international standards Wassercluster Lunz (WCL) 6.50
Task 1.2 Assessment of previous and ongoing EU initiatives Wassercluster Lunz (WCL)
Task 1.3 Assessment of EU Structural Funds including IPA and ENPI University of Novi Sad (UNS) 3.75
Task 1.4 Assessment of dedicated initiatives funded by countries from the Danube region through R&D programmes Romanian National Institute of Biological Sciences (INSB) 5.00
Task 1.5 National public funds through other agencies Széchenyi István University (SZEC) 3.75
Task 1.6 Other international funds UNESCO-IHE 2.50
Progress during the reporting period:
The Grant Agreement was signed in May 2013, being effective from June 1st 2013. The first reporting period ended on 30 May 2014, the second reporting period ended on 31 May 2015. The progress on each task is summarised in Table 1 below, including comments on most important activities.
In developing the database, the leaders of tasks 1.2 to 1.6 developed a common approach to data collection: An online questionnaire was developed under the lead of INSB and designed to gather projects of all five tasks. Returned questionnaires were input to the metadatabase before the end of 2013. Simultaneously projects were entered directly into the online database. In the beginning of 2014 a quality check of the collected entries was performed and a first evaluation and analyses of the metadatabase entries was made.
WP 2 - Understanding the linkages, gaps and needs in knowledge transfer
WP 2 reviewed strengths and weaknesses in the R&I for integrated environmental management in the Danube Region. The WP sought to develop a “knowledge matrix” – to achieve integrated knowledge transfer in the Danube Region. This was achieved through interactive events with the three main pillars of stakeholders communities: 1) science, 2) industry and 3) policy makers, decision makers and administrations.
Summary:
As a result of changes accepted at the first General Assembly, coordination of WP2 was moved from BafG to the project coordinator, GeoEcoMar which also assumed the leadership of Tasks 2.2. and 2.5.
WP2 was originally foreseen to commence in Month 9 of the project (February 2014). However, the WP and Task coordinators considered it important to commence preparation of the first two workshops before this date, and hence the actual starting date was January 2014. Thus, the list of attendees, invitations and draft agendas were established 2 months before March 2014, when the first 2 workshops were held. The workshops (accommodation for all participants and travel for invited guests, workshop venue, etc.) were co-funded by the Romanian Ministry for National Education.
A brief description of the tasks, coordinators and Person Month resources is presented in the Table 2 below.
Table 2 Summary of tasks in WP2
Task no. Task name Responsible Institution Resources (months)
Task 2.1 Workshop with Science community Hellenic Centre of Marine Researches (HCMR) 5.45
Task 2.2 Workshop with Industry and Business community GeoEcoMar 5.45
Task 2.3 Workshop with policy makers, decision makers and administrations Zentrum fur Soziale Innovation (ZSI) 5.45
Task 2.4 Dialogue conference gathering opinions of the 3 main type of actors Institut Francais de Recherche pour l`Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER) 5.45
Task 2.5. The “knowledge matrix” = the SWOT analysis obtained after exposing the three pillars for innovation in the Danube Region - to the three main categories of stakeholders GeoEcoMar 5.45
The first three tasks (2.1. 2.2. 2.3.) comprised workshops with the scientific, business and decision making communities and took place in March and May 2014 (M10 and M12).
Task 2.4. Dialogue conference gathering opinions of the 3 main categories of actors
During the Gyor General Assembly (June 2014, Mid Term Review) discussions were held between the WP2 Task coordinators and the WP1 and WP3 leaders to prepare a Dialogue Conference. The discussions, were coordinated by the Task 2.4. Leader (IFREMER), and concluded that a unitary questionnaire covering all the project topics (Research and Innovation Agenda, Research Infrastructure, Education Programme) should be developed by the beginning of Month 14 and distributed widely through Europe and to the participants at the first three events. An on-line questionnaire was put on the project website (http://heras.geoecomar.ro/vot/index.php/776625/lang-en) and distributed by all project partners in Europe, to the main stakeholders. Although the on-line questionnaire was not envisaged in the DoW, it collated material for the Dialogue Conference and for the final WP3 deliverables. At the same meeting the list of participants to be invited to the Dialogue Conference was agreed, focusing on active and interested stakeholders who had attended the previous workshops. Invitations were sent in June 2014 and the Dialogue Conference was held in Bucharest, Romania, on September 8-9, 2014. At the Conference the outcomes from the first three workshops were discussed and a SWOT analysis (the “Knowledge Matrix”) for the Danube Region was completed ( D2.5.).
Task 2.5. The “knowledge matrix”.
During the Dialogue Conference, the main goal was to to obtain a harmonized vision on needs for the Danube Region, as well as the development of the “Knowledge matrix”. After the Conference a draft “Knowledge Matrix” was distributed for further comments and improvements to the project and conference participants, and to other actors from the Danube Region. The Knowledge Matrix was further discussed and improved during the General Assembly held in Vienna in December 2014. There the improved Knowledge Matrix v.2.0 was adopted and considered as basis for the activities in WP3.
Although not originally foreseen, the on-line questionnaire developed to gather supplementary information for the Knowledge Matrix and for WP3 needs was developed in Months 13-14. Over 100 responses were gathered, and the ideas contributed to the proposals from D3.1 – D3.3.
WP 3 - Design of new tools and instruments aiming at boosting knowledge transfer, enhance Research and Innovation cooperation for the environment at the more integrated strategic level
WP3 sought to design tools and instruments to facilitate knowledge and technology transfer – and to enhance research and innovation cooperation.
Summary:
WP focussed on identifying the scientific and technological requirements and innovations necessary to ensure the environmental and ecological security of the Danube-Delta-Black Sea macrosystem. This WP brought together experts from across Europe encompassing skills from the biomolecular/biochemical level through stable- and radioisotope tracing techniques, physical and ecological process characterisation to specialists in quantitative earth observation. All partners had applied experience within the policy arena, conservation and environmental management, regulation and industry.
The tasks of the WP were:
Task 3.1. New tools for boosting science and innovation in the service of industry and policy/decision makers.
Task 3.2. Improved research infrastructure for innovative integrated management of the river-delta-sea macrosystems in the Danube Region.
Task 3.3. Strengthening the human capital in the Danube – Black Sea Macroregion towards the innovative integrated management of river-delta-sea systems.
Each of these tasks is dealt with in the following sections.
A.. DANCERS Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda for the Danube Region
The overarching aim of WP3, in producing a Strategic Agenda for Research and Innovation (SRIA), was to review and evaluate the outcomes and uptake of existing and ongoing research within regional, EU and international scientific projects and initiatives that concern riverine, delta and sea systems. Specifically, the gaps between science and policy were critically reviewed, with particular focus on how research at different scales (local, regional, nation state) or concerned with separate elements of river-delta-sea systems (e.g. river channel or delta or sea) is integrated and could inform society and policy. Additionally, international projects, that were designed to support policy decisions in industrial sectors such as aqua- culture, fisheries, energy, navigation, coastal protection and aggregate extraction (e.g. CONSCIENCE (EU FP6), COEXIST, CORALFISH, MESMA (EU FP7), were closely examined to determine their impact on policy-makers and the relevant industrial sector.
Scientifically coherent solutions for integrated river-basin-sea management require an interdisciplinary approach that is well communicated and able to inform decisions by society, industry and government. The proposed SRIA addresses these research priorities in the context of Pillars and Priority Areas of the EU Strategy for the Danube.
Proposed Research Priorities for the Danube – Black Sea System
A.1 Restoring Ecosystem continuity throughout the DBS System
Two centuries of engineering works have heavily impacted the ecosystems in the Danube River – Danube Delta – NW Black Sea continuum. Dams have cut the longitudinal continuity, while embankments and polder transformation have affected lateral connectivity, notably through the loss of most of Danube floodplains. Science must contribute to the restoration of both longitudinal and lateral connectivity of the various Danube ecosystems by implementing solutions to work with Nature, and not against it.
A.2 Pathways of transport and accumulation of litter(plastic) and pollutants (including emerging pollutants) in the DBS System and their impacts on local ecosystems
The Danube River is responsible for substantial inputs of litter, which accumulates throughout the basin, including in the Danube Delta and the Black Sea. To minimize the litter load, which affects both the freshwater and marine environment, we have to understand the transport and accumulation pathways. This knowledge will support the problem solving at the sources from the entire basin. Innovative waste management schemes should be introduced for regions where such schemes do not exist, in addition to better management of the river outflows in extreme flooding events. These innovative schemes will minimize all categories of litter (meso-, macro-, micro-) and their corresponding effects on the biota with the freshwater, transitional and marine environments.
A.3 Ensuring safe and continuous navigation while restoring the Danube green corridors (with strengthened natural protection from floods)
There is a need to reconcile the demands of navigation with the challenges of environmental restoration in the Lower Danube. Inland navigation and connection with the maritime transport are essential drivers for economic development in the Danube – Black Sea Region as well as worldwide. Dredging is required to ensure a permanent and safe waterway. However, the solutions applied to-date have not achieved sustained navigation during periods of low water flow. Smart and innovative “nature based” solutions that involve the integrated management of sediments and maximize the uses of their ecosystem services are required to ensure continuous navigation and reconcile with the plans of the green corridors development. The results will pioneer the effective management strategies which will have generic value other river-sea systems in Europe and beyond.
A.4 Mutual ecological and economic benefits from ecosystem restoration of eutrophicated ecosystems in the Danube – Black Sea interaction zone
A better understanding is needed of the wider environmental benefits arising from ecosystem restoration in degraded waterbodies. There are potential economic and ecological benefits and trade-offs in, for example, in harvesting plant and algal biomass from transitional eutrophic waters in the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve. This is an underexplored research theme that has applied relevance not just in the Danube Delta, but across the whole of the EU. Other benefits could include nutrient reclamation, water quality remediation, increased recreational value and the exploitation of high-value product. The latter may include, new markets for traditional products, such as reeds. Research is needed to help underpin and advance an agenda that aims to create win-win situations in resource use and ecosystem remediation.
A.5 Dealing with Eutrophication in the Danube – Black Sea interaction zone by using algae as 2nd Generation Biofuels
The recent development of refineries using algae as second generation of biofuels may provide smart and innovative solutions to deal with eutrophication phenomena in the NW Black Sea. Nutrient discharges from the Danube contribute to the explosive development of algal populations in the sea under the influence of the river. Efficient use of the algae as raw materials for biofuel refineries require the profound understanding of freshwater – marine water interactions, variation of nutrient loads supplied by the Danube to the Black Sea, life cycle of algae development and blooming phenomena as well as forecasting of dynamics of the marine area where the algal blooms would evolve. These factors are critical in establishing a performant algae harvesting plan with the double function of providing raw material for biofuels and retention of river-born nutrients from the Black Sea waters.
A.6. Using latest Earth observation (EO) technologies coupled with in situ measurements for an upgraded DBS System environmental monitoring scheme
Capitalising on the launch of ESA’s next generation EO capabilities coupled with in-situ sensor technologies, long term research sites are needed to develop innovative high resolution and long lasting observation systems for transboundary basin scale water management in the Danube system. Effective management of large transboundary river-sea basins such as the Danube is hindered by the lack of standardisation in basin scale monitoring to characterise water quality, changes in biodiversity and hydrology. The development of sensor networks and concerted observation provides the opportunity to overcome these obstacles and provide new insights. Such sensors can also provide a platform to develop novel passive and active sensors to detect emerging pollutants, such as those associated with pharmaceuticals, hospital, industrial and domestic discharges. Sensor networks coupled to biodiversity assessments and combined with Earth observation data, exploiting next generation platforms from ESA’s Sentinel programme, and complex numerical modelling are likely to provide new understandings of the fate and impact of these pollutants, responses of organisms and the hydrological connectivity and functioning of the Danube River-Delta-Black Sea. Such an approach will facilitate more effective regulation and management to mitigate against the impact of pollutants on aquatic ecosystems and society.
A.7 Developing sustainable agricultural practices (crops, husbandry) while obtaining good water quality in the DBS System
The EU Common Agricultural Policy aims to provide sufficient and safe quantities of food by applying latest scientific and technological innovations in regulation and management practices that protect the environment. One of the biggest challenges is to implement this goal in very large areas, such as the Danube River Basin. Innovative methods are needed to achieve this goal whilst also obtaining good water quality in the Danube River – Danube Delta – NW Black Sea.
A.8 Understanding river-sea interaction processes in the Danube Delta transitional environments
Implementing European policies in transitional environments needs to be undertaken within a framework that allows for a better understanding of their functioning to maximise the benefits of their implementation and minimise any detrimental impacts on ecosystems, society and water quality. Several European policies connect in transitional areas in the river-sea continua, such as estuaries, deltas, lagoons and other coastal wetlands, such as WFD, MSFD, Flood Directive, and ICZM. A fundamental understanding of the functioning of the complex, dynamic and vulnerable transitional environments and their relation to social and economic aspects as well as to global change, are the basis for more effective management and thus make better use of the potential of the afore mentioned policies. A true holistic and interdisciplinary approach is needed to significantly increase our understanding of these transitional systems.
A.9 Managing dams and reservoir lakes as critical sediment traps and bottlenecks for river habitats continuity in the DBS System
Dams act as traps, interrupting the natural flow and continuum of water, sediments and biota. As a result they contribute to changes in ecosystems and the considerable accumulation of sediments in the related barrage lakes. Pollutants also accumulate in these lakes, transforming them into potential ecological „time bombs”. Detailed knowledge and inventory of these sediments along with their potential ecological impacts of any contaminant is needed along with an estimate of the accumulation and migration processes to develop adequate sediment bypassing solutions to prevent critical environmental incidents.
A.10 Restoring natural habitats in the Danube floodplains – Danube Delta and lagoon systems as support for fisheries revival.
Destroying floodplains and their associated wetlands and closing the Danube Delta lagoons, have been some of the critical factors in the failure of the fisheries in the Danube River – Danube Delta – Black Sea system. Plans to support fisheries revival and sustainable aquaculture must include actions to restore the spawning grounds and nursery habitats for native fish and other aquatic species, increasing the exchange of water and resources between channel and floodplain, and using this connectivity to increase ecosystem resilience to external drivers such as climate change and invasion.
A.11 Understanding Climate change impacts on the DBS System by applying the latest generation of models
Climate change will have differing impacts throughout the Danube River – Danube Delta – Black Sea system. The latest generation of climate models are invaluable tools to enable us to understand the impacts and prepare detailed adaptation and mitigation management plans. To understand the impacts of climate change, records of the thermal dynamics in lakes, lagoons and flowing waters is required to understand the impacts of climate change. Where historical records are missing, some reconstruction of surface water temperatures along with other essential climate variables (ECVs) is possible from Earth observation data.
A.12 Managing water resources for human use by implementing new technologies for water abstraction, purification, distribution, collection, treatment and reuse in the DBS System
There are considerable uncertainties concerning the flux and storage of carbon from the headwaters of the Danube, through large alluvial river-floodplain reaches in the middle of the catchment, to the freshwater – marine transitional zone of the Danube Delta and the Black Sea. For example, floodplain wetlands in the Danube and its tributaries can potentially function as both a carbon store and a carbon sink, and where closely integrated with river systems they can represent an important source of carbon for the Black Sea, albeit with considerable seasonal variation. Fluxes of dissolved organic matter (DOM) from wetlands are the largest and most bioavailable pool of fluvial DOM, which affect the transport of organic pollutants, particle surface and colloid chemistry, photochemistry of natural waters and nutrient availability in freshwater systems. DOM also contributes to chemical processes in natural water bodies by altering surface-water acidity, and affecting metal speciation and ion-exchange between the water and sediment phase. Significantly, to-date DOM has been relatively poorly studied across the freshwater – marine transitional zone in the Danube Delta: DOM is generally likely to be dominated in the headwaters of the Danube by inputs of terrestrially-derived DOM and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations are high; while the controls on DOM downstream are often related to the rate of water movement. However, the subsequent transformation of DOM in freshwater – marine transitional zone within the Delta is uncertain, yet this knowledge is fundamental to closing the carbon cycle.
A.13 Harmonising scientific data and monitoring protocols in the DBS System
Integrated management of the DBS system can be successfully implemented only by fully understanding the upstream – sea continuum and by having compatible and harmonized indicators of state. This requires a harmonisation of monitoring protocols in the freshwater, transitional and marine components of the system. Ultimately, the aim should be to generate robust quality data to inform and enable efficient and effective management across the Danube basin. Harmonization and optimization of sampling approaches and monitoring systems and protocols needs careful attention, with respect to the adoption of standard methods and co-ordination of monitoring scales.
A.14 Unfolding the cultural heritage potential of the DBS System by using scientific tools
The strategic location and natural resources of this region has made it attractive to settlers for millennia. As a result the area is known to contain a wealth of historic and prehistoric sites. This important cultural resource is also threatened by land use change, development and significantly climate change. Remote sensing coupled with geo-archaeology has the potential to uncover cultural heritage sites. Such approaches could inform future management of these cultural landscapes and the sites they contain to ensure their continued preservation. The OECD has identified cultural tourism as one of the fastest growing global tourism markets. Regional tourism could take advantage of these tools and new cultural heritage objectives to sustainably develop new attractions and business opportunities.
A.15 Reducing future risks of invasive species in the DBS System
Understanding potential dispersal pathways for invasive species and factors that influence their success is critical. Invasive species have benefited from human-disturbed systems, including introduction of hard substrate, altered nutrient regimes, or altered food web structure. The potentially devastating impact invasive species may have on the DBS system must be reduced by (i) exhaustive risk management plans dealing with all human activities that may represent future routes of introduction and transmission and (ii) by identifying the attributes of native communities that promote resilience to invasion.
A.16 Interdisciplinary scientific support for the successful implementation of the Sturgeon 2020 Flagship Project in the DBS System
Interdisciplinary research integrating environmental and socio-economic issues is needed for the successful and sustainable implementation of the Sturgeon 2020 Flagship Project of the EUSDR. Existing projects and programmes must be coordinated to focus on solve the most important uncertainties and critical questions related to the restoration of the sturgeon populations, raising awareness and broader understanding of communities and the development of new economic opportunities related to aquaculture and conservation of sensitive environments in the DBS system.
A.17 The DBS System Atlas
Decision support systems covering in an exhaustive way the entire DBS system are major tools to be used by all managers. An electronic atlas should provide harmonized layers of information from the physical and environmental aspects to land use, activities and social issues. The atlas would thus provide a critical support to understand the effects of the development and implementation of various policies.
A.18 Innovative means to harness water energy in the DBS System
Harnessing energy from water and other renewable sources in a way that does not significantly affect ecosystems is a major issue for the DBS system. Innovative engineering schemes are needed for an effective energy generation, from the river water flow to the marine waves and currents. Specific cogeneration devices alternatively using energy from wind, water and solar sources are needed to solve the critical problem of constant supply.
A.19 Promoting Cross Border Environmental Stewardship in the DBS System through Citizen Science
Systematic and timely monitoring of large river-sea systems with complex geopolitical histories remains challenging. Monitoring these waters in the DBS Sea is restricted by economic and logistical constraints. These constraints include the lack of cross-border harmonisation in monitoring and management at the catchment scale. Engaging citizens in the role of monitoring through the development of citizen observatories can change the monitoring paradigm whilst also empowering citizens in governance and their environmental awareness. A number of emerging technologies, including smart-phones and inexpensive sensors which can be widely distributed now provide the framework for effective monitoring of water quality. Data streams from both citizen science projects and earth observation sensors can be used in research and education. This is particularly helpful in understanding the connectivity between the landscape and surface waters at high spatial and temporal resolution and at a catchment scales, and in forming a cohesive and connected region among citizens and managers across the widely diverse histories and cultures in the region. In addition to delivering a step change in environmental monitoring, this approach can also promote the aspiration of citizen- based environmental stewardship.
A.20 Cross-cutting SRIA activities in the DBS System
Establishment of a Steering Body compriseing senior scientists and stakeholders from across the region and with backgrounds in education, research, industry, government and environmental management and protection is required to promote the SRIA. Development of a roadmap for either individual, or a combination of research priorities, to include monitoring of progress and assessment of the impact resulting from the publication of the SRIA. Planned revision of priorities after 5 years to re-assess their relevance to the DBS System and in the context of scientific advances and changes in funding directions.
B. Detailed plans and concepts for a new regional research infrastructure in the field of integrated river- delta – sea management in the Danube – Black Sea area
This is an opportune time to address the challenges, identified above, by a cross- disciplinary distributed Research Infrastructure (RI) on freshwater – marine systems. The RI can potentially build upon the world- leading capabilities of the European environmental science community to deliver the necessary step-change in our understanding.
The initiative to develop a RI in the Danube River Basin and Black Sea is further enhanced by the coincidence of the following factors:
i. Political framework including EUSDR and ESFRI.
ii. Timeliness of technical advances (analytical capabilities – eg. mass spectrometry, DNA e-sequencing, satellites sensors, mesocosms, numerical modelling, smart sensor networks)
iii. Resource exploitation
iv. European e-infrastructures initiatives (Geant & PRACE)
v. Existence of the GEOSS and the COPERNICUS programmes
It is important to look forward and consider the degree to which the research needs identified in Section 2 (SWOT analysis and conclusions from DANCERS workshops) and the opportunities summarised in Section 3, can be addressed by the two new EUSDR flagship research initiatives in the Danube – Black Sea system (River, Delta and Sea). Together these initiatives (DREAM and DANUBIUS-RI) have the potential to provide world-leading facilities that will facilitate inter-disciplinary research in the Danube - Black Sea system. Both projects will build capacity and will benefit from active engagement with the European research community.
B.1 DANUBIUS-RI (International Centre for Advanced Studies on River-Sea Systems)
DANUBIUS-RI seeks to provide a world-leading RI to enable interdisciplinary research on freshwater – marine systems. In so doing it aims to identify and implement solutions to reconcile conflicting human uses within several river-sea systems in Europe, comprising the Danube - Black Sea. These solutions require a holistic basin approach (from source to the sea), that spans the Danube – Black Sea system.
The RI will comprise a Hub, Supersites, Nodes, a Data Centre and Technology Transfer Office. Project co-ordination will be the responsibility of the Hub, situated in the Danube Delta, Romania. The infrastructure will be linked by the DANUBIUS Commons: a set of harmonized methods, protocols, instruments data acqui- sition and management to ensure quality assured and comparable data acquired across DANUBIUS-RI, to guarantee the consistency and quality of scientific output.
Supersites (field laboratories) are planned for the Danube River – Black Sea system at: (i) the Danube Delta (Romania); (ii) the Danube River at Szigetköz (Hungary) investigating surface-groundwater interactions; and (iii) Lake Lunz (Austria) focusing on the effects of climate change on aquatic ecosystems. Figure 1 illustrates the site for the Hub, distribution of the supersites and nodes.
Nodes are key thematic facilities based on institutions with world-leading facilities and expertise, will ensure disciplinary rigour. Although located outside the Danube Region (Observation: Plymouth Marine Laboratory, UK; Analysis: BfG, Germany; Modelling: ISMAR, Italy; Social/Economic: Deltares, Netherlands), they will work to build capability and capacity across Europe including the Danube Region. They will do this by appointing other laboratories (Accredited Service Providers) in the Danube Basin that conform to the DANUBIUS Commons and meet a need in the provision of facilities and services.
DANUBIUS-RI provides a unique opportunity to bring together European expertise and facilities with an internationally leading focus on understanding, characterising and managing freshwater and marine systems globally. Opportunities provided by research in the natural laboratory of the Danube – Black Sea system, will be maximised by building capacity with a new RI with wider engagement from European researchers and insti- tutions. This exemplar will provide research outputs that will be transferrable to other river – sea systems globally.
B.2 DREAM (Danube River Research and Management)
DREAM aims to improve research infrastructure in the Danube basin in order to develop measures to improve the actual situation in river engineering, flood risk management, hydropower, navigation and protecting the Danube River ecosystems. It envisages the construction of two new laboratories in Romania and Austria, the upgrade of existing laboratories throughout the DRB, the development of a network that spans the joint usage (and application) of numerical models, the installation and running of field study sites, and the construction of a research vessel. DREAM furthermore seeks to foster improved cooperation between research organisations in the Danube basin as well as research groups based outside the region.
There is an urgent need to integrate use and protection of the Danube River in a sustainable way. Research is of fundamental importance to derive monitoring strategies, modelling and engineering solutions to improve measures suited to reach a win-win situation between economic use and environmental protection of the Danube River. This will be strongly related to the Danube River Basin Management Plan (Figure 3).
Figure 3. DREAM EUSDR Research Infrastructure proposed architecture. Map showing the location of the proposed new facilities to be developed (situation September 2014).
DREAM will provide an improvement of research infrastructure and cooperation between research institutions in the Danube basin. The two new laboratories combined with existing ones offer unique possibility for large- scale physical laboratory investigation allowing fundamental and applied research. One is situated in the Upper Danube in Vienna. It uses the water level difference between the Danube and the Danube Canal of 3 m to reach a laboratory providing free flowing discharge of up to 10 m³/s. This will be a unique facility in Europe. The focus of research will be steeper slope reaches, coarse sediment transport interacting with flood risk ma- nagement, hydropower, navigation and ecology, thus the Upper and Middle Danube are mainly investigated there. The Romanian new Laboratory will concentrate on low slope and fine grained sediment transport, including the Deltaic and estuarine conditions.
DREAM provides an umbrella and the infrastructure for a set of research topics. These topics are intercon- nected and cover several disciplines, from basic research, to be represented by advanced hydraulic laboratories and sophisticated 3D models on high computational technology, to applied research, providing field data to mitigate hydrological extremes and to improve existing situations in water regimes, sediment regime, flood risk, drought problems, hydropower, revision of bio-engineering measures, restoration of streams and flood plains, etc.
The DREAM partnership includes all Danube River Basin Countries and further research institutions outside the basin.
B3 Proposed partnership
The partnership between the two flagship projects aims to fulfil the needs of the region. DANUBIUS-RI and DREAM are complementary RI projects: while they have different objectives, there are areas of interface, and potential synergy, between the two flagship projects. DREAM focusses on hydrodynamics, sediment trans- port, river morphodynamics, flood risk management and engineering in the Danube River basin. DANUBIUS-RI has a wide disciplinary scope (physical, chemical, biological, social and economic sciences) and covers not only the Danube - Black Sea macrosystem but other large European River-Sea systems. The two projects have a number of partner organisations in common across Europe. The opportunities for partnership include:
• collaboration and sharing of field sites (DREAM field study sites; DANUBIUS-RI Supersites and other field sites) in the Danube River basin;
• use of DANUBIUS-RI facilities in the Danube Delta, and elsewhere, for DREAM activities;
• use of DREAM facilities for DANUBIUS-RI activities;
• collection and sharing of data using the same protocols;
• facilities provided by both facilities to be used for research on the main common point of interest - dynamics of sediments in the Danube – Black Sea;
• DANUBIUS-RI Data Centre will provide support on request to DREAM;
• DREAM facility in Vienna has the potential to become a Node of DANUBIUS-RI on river hydraulics, or establish a clear agreement to cover this role; and
• DANUBIUS-RI Technological Transfer Office will support specific requests coming from the DREAM project.
B.4 Means of cooperation, data accessibility
It is important that DANUBIUS-RI and DREAM develop and maintain a close level of cooperation on all major topics, from strategic research directions to data sharing, joint projects, and agreements towards common use of several facilities. This cooperation is helped by several key participant institutions from Roma- nia (GeoEcoMar – coordinating the ESFRI process of DANUBIUS-RI) and Austria (WCL, BOKU) being present in both RI initiatives.
Ongoing collaboration is ensured by DREAM representatives being invited to participate in the DANUBIUS- RI ESFRI Preparatory Phase (subsequent to the access on the 2016 ESFRI Roadmap). DANUBIUS-RI repre- esentatives are participating in the DREAM project meetings. These joint actions will contribute to the final and detailed decision to strengthen the long lasting collaboration between the two RIs.
B.5 Implementation strategy and funding sources
DANUBIUS-RI: After obtaining ESFRI status, DANUBIUS-RI will be eligible for Structural Funds. Romania dedicated a chapter for the building of the Hub from Structural Funds – the Competitiveness Operational Programme (for RIs) 2014 – 2020 – and part of the facilities to be developed in the Danube Delta as DREAM - Romania are eligible here. Structural funds and national funding in all European countries hosting parts of DANUBIUS-RI are available for construction, and such funds were already identified under adequate Smart Specialisation Strategies in each EU country where Nodes and Supersites are being developed. National funds and other sources are also sought where necessary to supplement the financial resources, both for construction and for operation.
DREAM: DREAM aims to use all funding opportunities in the Danube Region, from national to specific programmes and structural funds. The CBC (Cross Border Cooperation) Programmes existing between all the DREAM consortium countries are excellent opportunities to build most of the hard infrastructure required for the project.
The newly launched programme DANUBE is crucial for both projects and may become a major funding source to continue the already established collaboration.
C Human Capital Development Programme
The proposal for the education agenda is achieved through an analysis of the gaps and opportunities for an integrated approach towards a better alignment of international education and Human Resource development in the Danube Basin. Developments in the Danube – Black Sea system macro-region include a number of initiatives and activities from before and after the 1990s (the fall of the Iron Curtain). In this context, the document reflects on the challenges including access to education programmes, new developments (including the credit transfer system) and the language requirements necessary for more substantial international co-operation. The document reflects on stakeholder opinions and provides a general discussion of the existing programs in the field of higher education and professional training. Based on the presented challenges and opportunities with which the educational needs are faced, DANCERS proposes a model for a new Danube educational programme that could lead to a better integration of the river-delta-sea management practices. In principle, the new Danube education programme has at its core a pyramid base and approach that aims to address different levels of education.
The main aim of such a programme is to build a network of institutions and to develop agreements and mecha-nisms to facilitate the exchange of experts, students and scientists at the following educational levels within the Danube Basin.
C.1 Technicians
One big challenge of the EUSDR is the difference in educational structure between individual countries, i.e. regarding professional education and chances on the job market (oead´news 1/94 p. 23). To facilitate exchange of personnel it is necessary to ensure a high level of quality in basic training; standardised methods; and promote exchange of know-how on an advanced level. Therefore, technicians should be encouraged to visit labs for short term hands on training courses, helping to foster technical cooperation between research centres and industries. Also, it is crucial to grant internationally recognised certificates for participants of the training courses.
Relevant course contents could include e.g. measuring water quantity (discharge, sediment transport) and water quality parameters (quality assurance/quality control practices), data acquisition, storage and preparation of samples, generation of regulatory data, calibration and maintenance of lab and field equipment, conducting data management including statistical analyses and field sampling etc.
C.2 Undergraduate students
The international network should embolden bachelor students to spend one or two semesters, or to undertake research projects, at a partner institution in the Danube Black Sea system (academia and industry sector), to gain international experience.
On bachelor level, there is a large range of possibilities for international exchange in Danube – Black Sea system. What is missing is a clearly arranged platform that gives a complete overview.
There should also be a strengthening of a Danube Basin undergraduate student exchange programme and an offering of specific undergraduate Danube related special courses. These courses range e.g. from fundamental subjects like environmental science, geomorphology, hydraulics, hydrology, sediment transport, ecology, social and political science courses to an integrated water and river management.
C.3 Postgraduate students (MSc)
Master Students exchange is of utmost importance to the future improvement of the Danube River Basin Man- agement since many alumni will work later in governmental organisations like Ministries, Water Authorities, Consulting Companies (planning measures to improve the water management situation in the Basin) or the Private Sector (e.g. Hydropower Companies, Navigation sector). Thus there is a direct impact of the education improvement on water and river management.
By strengthening a Danube Basin postgraduate student exchange programme and offering of specific postgraduate Danube related special courses these goals should be reachable.
One element could be a newly developed Master´s programme based on the following topics:
• Ecology and limnology, including assessment methods, restoration and management schemes, etc;
• Hydrology and hydraulics, from theory to practical application
• Sustainable water management, including e.g. sustainable flood protection, hydro-power, navigation,
• River preservation and restoration, sustainable water use for irrigation; and
• Socioeconomics, including ecotourism.
The programme should include an obligation for an internship/apprenticeship in a research institute or in industry. For the further development also see “Guidelines for Curriculum Development and Quality Assur- ance of Joint Master Programmes” (Euroleague for Life Sciences).
C.4 Postgraduate students (PhD)
A further goal is to facilitate an international exchange of Danube Basin PhDs, aiming at exchanging and assimilating know-how between countries/institutions and advancing knowledge by either taking specific, specialised modules or undertaking specific credit bearing research projects (e.g. PhD thesis, scientific projects) in a host institution or jointly. Also, the jointly use of research facilities would enhance exchange and knowledge transfer and could be an eligible development considering limited financial and material resources.
To meet these challenges and needs in education, we propose that CASEE, Danube Rectors’ Conference (DRC), the European Academy of Science and the Black Sea Universities Network (BSUN) should be integrated to work on a Danube specific programme, to enhance the efforts and implement it. Also, it is proposed to seek pan-European funding and supervisors with key expertise distributed across the region to capitalise on the expertise available. CEEPUS (the “Central European Exchange Program for University Stud- ies”) could serve as a model programme.
Based on these models the establishment of a Danube Basin PhD programme should be initiated. Furthermore the development of a Danube education cooperation strategy should be initiated.
C5 Scientists:
Finally, the proposed Danube education programme also includes the scientists, from PostDocs, junior to senior lecturers to full professors. In this field a joint teaching and research program and a scientist exchange strategy among the Danube – Black Sea system universities is envisaged. In order to reach these goals the following roadmap could be followed: In a conference scientists of the whole Danube – Black Sea system, dealing with water and river – delta – coastal sea research, could meet and discuss ways and strategies to estab- lish a joint and fully complementary teaching and research program. The conference would establish working groups that would be initiated with specific tasks that cover both strategic teaching and research areas. Within a period of two years a concrete strategy should be available as draft version, to be discussed and adopted in a final conference. In parallel, means to improve the flow and exchange of scientists and expertise between different Danube Region universities should be constructed. The DRC and BSUN should be involved so that there exist at the end direct implementation ideas that allow the realisation.
C.6 Lifelong learning
Across Europe the importance of providing lifelong learning is increasingly recognised and can take many forms: in academic institutions, in places of employment, at home (distance learning) and through leisure activities. At one level, lifelong learning can facilitate retraining of individuals, providing a more flexible labour force. It also enables individuals to develop their knowledge and technical expertise to adapt to changing requirements of the labour market and fulfil the requirement of continuous professional development. It is important to acknowledge that this also applies to administrators and managers (Table 5.5) as well as scientists.
In the UK (NIACE, 2009: www.niace.org.uk) a recent review of lifelong learning advocates a 4-stage model: i. up to 25; ii. 25–50; iii. 50–75, and iv. 75+. While people in the first stage may learn as ‘young people, in the second stage, lifelong learning can sustain productivity and prosperity. Training and education opportunities are also important in stage 3, to facilitate retraining, but increasingly, stage 4 is becoming important in delivering an appropriate curriculum in later life.
A major request that came out during the DANCERS workshop with the managers and administrators in May 2014 regarded a stronger and more intensive lifelong learning system. All participants required to have systematic intensive training, during which to be instructed in the latest scientific updates / available tools.
Depending on the type of managers and administrators as well as the field of interest three professional training programmes are proposed:
• Specialised courses related to a certain field of expertise (e.g. river hydraulics, coastal dynamics, Sediment transport, flood risk management)
• Summer schools consisting of a theoretical and practical part.
• Masters courses as programs that are run in parallel to the job
Specialised courses related to a certain field of expertise would be offered by a specific University covering a needed subject. Summer schools could be offered by several universities and be implemented at a special location, eventually close to the Danube River and the Danube Delta / Black Sea coast (depending also on the topic). There, theory and practical work should be included to allow an easier transfer from basic research to application.
A third suggestion is the development of a Masters course as a programme in parallel to employment, meaning that the courses would have to take place in the evening, on weekends or during job releases. It could be envisaged that this could be a special Danube - Black Sea Masters programme. These courses or schools should result in certified diplomas.
Potential Impact:
Research and innovation programmes should respond to the socio-economic needs of the European Union and its Member States and Associated Countries. Today, these countries are facing complex challenges that will shape our common future. Top issues include a sustainable supply of food and energy, securing jobs and economic prosperity, ensuring human health for aging populations.
The DANCERS deliverables will contribute to the development of greener, smarter economies, central components of the new “Europe 2020” Strategy, the EU's knowledge-based growth strategy for the next decade. DANCERS is particularly relevant for the EU Strategy for Danube Region but also for the flagship initiatives: Innovation Union, An Industrial Policy for the Globalization of ERA and Resource Efficient Europe are particularly relevant.
The three final Deliverables of the project will be further implemented at national and regional level. The Romanian Academy has already started the integration of the DANCERS deliverables into its national strategy for development of education and scientific research at the time horizon of 2035. In the Academy Project 8 (Danube Research), the Knowledge Matrix (DANCERS Deliverable 2.5 introduced in Policy Brief 1), has been the basis for the SWOT analysis of research in the Lower Danube – re. Romanian institutions (see http://www.academiaromana.ro/bdar/strategiaAR/doc11/Strategia.pdf - pag. 353-354). DANCERS is the instrument that will allow several organisations in Danube Region to contribute to the establishment of the most advanced Program (in terms of education – research – knowledge transfer) = basis for a future distributed Research Infrastructure which will be dedicated to all the aspects regarding the advanced studies for the integrated management of the Danube – Danube Delta -– Black Sea macrosystem. After the design of the nodes to become part of this distributed infrastructure, its construction will be funded by EU from Structural Funds while day-to-day operation will be ensured by its funding members.
Furthermore, as the Black Sea is the final part of this macro-system, the implementation of DANCERS will help strengthen the EU position as major player in its Eastern Neighbourhood, attracting young brilliant scientists from Black Sea riparian Countries (e.g. Georgia, Ukraine, etc.). Offering solutions for river-delta-sea macrosystems will attract also scientists from the Black Sea Region involved in other river-delta-sea macrosystems, such as the Kura – Aras river and delta basin, from the Black to the Caspian Sea (Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan). The impacts of this broader pan-EU participation in DANCERS may be seen as major steps forward in addressing several of the European Union Strategy for the Danube Region, besides the PA 10 (To step up institutional capacity and cooperation ). The Scientific R&I Agenda will bring major contributions to: PA7 (To develop the Knowledge Society (research, education and ICT), PA5 To manage environmental risks), PA6 (To preserve biodiversity, landscapes and the quality of air and soils), PA 4 (To restore and maintain the quality of waters ), also the navigation aspects of PA1A (To improve mobility and intermodality of inland waterways). The educational espects of WP3 will have a significant impact on PA9 (To invest in people and skills), while the development of plans by connecting with the business community will certainly impact also on PA 8 (To support the competitiveness of enterprises).
The subsequent developments of DANCERS (R&D infrastructure plus the education programme plus the strategic agenda) could become a truly international pole of excellence in science and innovation. This will support “brain gain” in Europe by attracting the most talented young students and researchers from the Black Sea riparian countries and strengthening ties between the scientific communities from their EU and the Black Sea region.
The DANCERS dissemination plan was based on a framework structure for facilitating the transfer of results and cooperation, starting by the general structure for communication and outreach to the scientific community, the Administration community and the general public. This was necessary due to the character of the Danube-Black Sea system territory, which is mostly public domain and, therefore, managed by one or more public Administrations. The general public dimension is motivated by the fact that a high percentage of the population lives in the Danube-Black Sea (DBS) system and therefore the project outcomes aim to contribute to decrease the level of conflict and risk in that area.
Main dissemination activities
Dissemination activities were specifically oriented towards industries, policy and decision makers, and the scientific community. The dissemination tools were press releases and policy briefs, together with scientific publications and the project’s website. Press releases were scheduled every 6 months. Several of these have been uploaded to the project’s website by GeoEcoMar. Regarding scientific publications, the possibility arose through the University of Stirling (WP3 coordinators) of publishing a Special Issue of the Science of the Total Environment based on reviews of natural and anthropogenic impacts upon river-delta-sea systems, further along in the project.
We have produced papers, communications and news resulting in contributions to illustrate the variety of challenges faced at several coexisting scales by vulnerable riverine and coastal systems, with emphasis on the DBS system. We have disseminated our approach and results to representative forums and conferences in all the disciplines that converge in a catchment basin considered in a holistic manner.
a) Press releases
For the wider transmission of results, to reach private and public parties increasingly using the social network channels, we intend to provide short answers to the questions or interests of users, focusing on authorities and decision makers (at local to regional and global levels) plus users and stakeholders from all economic sectors converging in catchment basins.
b) Scientific publications and conferences
The main element of this dissemination is the collection of 12 scientific papers submitted to the Science of Total Environment as a special issue from the project.
This collection of papers consists of:
i) Two introductory papers dealing with the historic development of research in the DBS system (Hein et al) and with the education for action aligned with sustainable development policies in the Danube river basin (Irvine et al).
ii) This is followed by a collection of papers dealing with specific aspects of the Danube system: sediment dynamics and tectonics (Matenco et al), restoration options for flood plains (Hein et al), evolution of fish and fauna (Curtean-Banaduc et al), and plan resources in the Danube delta (Luminita et al).
iii) The next block consists of several papers dealing with integrated river basin management (Habersak et al), water quality management (Chapman et al) and adapting coastal environments to climate change (Sanchez-Arcilla et al). This block introduces wider dimensions than the DBS system region but is closely linked to this area.
iv) The final block consists of papers analysing earth observation capabilities for inland, transitional and shelf sea waters (Tyler et al) and the characterization of ecosystem services based on water sediment and biology (Politi et al).
v) The collection of papers is completed with an illustration of how to assess risk based on biological tools (Bratosin et al).
The structured collection of papers described above is supplemented by a production of papers presented at conferences dealing with specific aspects related to the DBS system or presenting a comparison with the macro region with other systems somehow represented in the partnership. This can be illustrated by the communication on carbon and nutrient dynamics in altered riverine landscapes (Hein et al 2014), on the evaluation of transient measures against storms (Garcia-Leon et al 2015) and on climate change and coastal sustainability implications (Sanchez-Arcilla et al 2015). The effect of climate change on various system components (e.g. Sanchez-Arcilla et al 2015) and the importance of scaling (Hein et al 2015) have also been considered.
In a similar manner, the project approach and linkage between groups and disciplines has been presented at a number of meetings such as ICPDR-2013 in Vienna, ACDR-2014 in Vienna, ASLO-2015 in Granada and Hydro-Echo 2015 in Vienna. To this we should add the linked presentations in Coastal Sediments 2015 in San Diego to illustrate the international dimension of the transfer. A sample illustration of the conferences in which DANCERS has been disseminated is given in table 3.
Within this scientific activity it has to be highlighted the ongoing PhD research between the University of Stirling and GeoEcoMar on the “Reconstructing Changes in Sediment Flux from the Danube into the Black Sea through Earth Observation, Hydrodynamic Modelling and Sediment Coring”, the main aim of which is to characterize the sediment transfer from the Danube catchment through the Danube Delta to inner shelf of the western Black Sea.
In addition to the Special Issue, the CIIRC and GeoEcoMar teams have been working on three papers related to the project. The first two attempt to identify and characterize similar current pulses (intensifications of the order of two days) observed at two coastal sites (Danube delta and Catalan coast), to determine their causes and possible implications.
a) Website metrics
The analytics of the webpage of the project, taken from the 1st of February 2014 to the 22th of May 2015, has been used as a measure of the media dissemination of the DANCERS contents. Annex IV presents a detailed description of all the related metric variables.
As it was initially expected, Romania tops the list by country (see figure 4) that have visited the webpage; however, English is the dominant language used within the webpage. The second in the ranking of countries is the USA with 544 visits, which indicates the success of the dissemination done until now. Most of the other countries in the list belong to the DBS system (44%) and also serve to show the interest the project has aroused in society (understood here as the whole spectra). Moreover, all continents are represented in the list of established sessions and in this sense it is an indicator of the high degree of dissemination achieved. As expected, English, Romanian and DBS system languages are the languages used to visit the webpage of the project. Another important aspect is the fact that about a third of those who visited the site returned which clearly indicates their interest in following the progress of the project.
Summary
The dissemination plan, progressively refined during the project development, has been based on the following elements:
i) Building and maintaining (during the project development) a web page to “disseminate” project activities as well as socially “punching” results (like the database).
ii) A leaflet/poster/roll-up and specific flyer has been distributed among scientific institutions, public administrations and potential end-users.
iii) Producing a number of high-quality (peer-reviewed) scientific papers in relevant journals including a Special Issue of Science of the Total Environment and conferences fcovering the river and coastal communities as well as the ecology, engineering, management or inter-disciplinary groups interested in the future of the DBS system.
iv) Communicating the project achievements in a non-scientific terminology to the river/coastal communities at local/regional levels, using the press, TV and the corresponding services of the participant universities/institutions.
v) Transferring the project results in a decision support context (seminars, webinars and workshops) to the public bodies and Agencies with management responsibilities (river, coastal, deltaic authorities) and the private “users” of the value of integrated information approach.
List of Websites:
http://www.dancers-fp7.eu/
project coordinator: dr. Adrian Stanica
National Institute of Marine Geology and Geoecology – GEOECOMAR
Str. Dimitrie Onciul, Nr. 23-25, RO-024053
e-mail: astanica@geoecomar.ro