Objective
In most regions within the EU the contribution made by the agricultural sector to the regional economy as a whole is declining. In the long run this may well have a dramatic effect on the maintenance of landscapes and the natural values embedded in them, the social fabric of the countryside regional employment levels and quite possible on society at large. Within this, context the notion of rural development (RD! Is emerging as an interesting alternative. Through RD the countryside might be revitalized although the extent to which this is possible is subject to debate. It is also unclear what conditions and policies are necessary to realize this effectively. The competiteveness viability and efficiency of the rural enterprises, understood as carriers of RD processes are not yet clearly understood. The lack of knowledge concerning both the possible socio-economic results of RD and it's mechanisms might very well become a considerable problem. The appeal and legitimacy of RD are dependent on convincing responses to this lacuna. More specifically this applies to the balance of effects associated with further liberalization in the WTO context and the entrance of new members to the EU on the one hand and the countervailing effects of RD on the other. Insight in the interrelations between specific RD policy measures and their socio-economic impact is also needed to provide European, national and regional politicians with the tools to select and to justify the most appropriate programmes and policy measures. The proposed research aims to elaborate empirically grounded responses to these questions. The potential socio-economic impact of RD will be assessed and the policies most adequate to produce and sustain such an impact will also be analyzed. The proposed research will be carried 0ut in 6 European countries. Casestudies of the most successful experiences of RD (albeit partly RD avant la lettre) and it's impact in terms of employment, income, investment, innovativeness will form the starting point of the research. Subsequently possibilities to generalize these experiences over wider areas will be studied using a range of economic and sociological techniques. A comparative approach, that takes the highly diversified interaction between policies and practice into consideration is basic. Amongst other things the outcome includes the empirically grounded and quantified assessment of the potential impact of RD and a specification of the policies most capable of securing such an impact.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Data not available
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Coordinator
6706 WAGENINGEN
Netherlands
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.