Skip to main content
European Commission logo print header

Article Category

Content archived on 2023-04-17

Article available in the following languages:

EN

Where did my berries go?

Researchers from EFI coordinated a newly released study in the Forest Policy and Economics’ July 2020 issue, which provides a thorough quantitative overview of non-wood forest products in Europe.

Society icon Society
Food and Natural Resources icon Food and Natural Resources

Foraging may seem like an outdoor recreational activity for some, but it is also a form of income for others. An international group of researchers involved in the BioMonitor and the StarTree projects conducted a survey on non-wood forest products, involving more than 17,000 household in 28 European countries, and drew insights that will be deemed useful for policymakers involved in the bioeconomy. Non-Wood Forest Products (NWFPs) are items in forests which we frequently cherry-pick while we go out for a nature walk. These include berries, mushrooms, nuts, resins and so on. Despite being an integral part of forest recreation, food security, rural income, and cultural heritage, these items are often overlooked and are therefore ignored in forest policy and management decisions as reflected by the poor data collection on them. The Value of Non-Wood Forest Products As reported, the collected NWFPs represent an economic value of 23.3 billion € per year in Europe. A data gap is evidently shown once comparing it to the suggested economic value of marketed NWFPs reported in the past (2.1 billion € per year). The study’s findings suggest that NWFPs being reported in the market represent only a small share and 86% of the collected weight is consumed by households and is not marketed. 26% of European households collect NWFPs, and their behaviors differ according to regions. Those in Eastern Europe think of these items as a source of income, as they sell a portion of what they gather to those residing in Western Europe, where most of the added value is generated. Present-day regulations for commercial picking of NWFPs from forests differ between these two regions. These end up influencing the food supply chain markets, and their relevance to rural development, and the bioeconomy. Its influence in the bioeconomy Given the ever-changing atmosphere of the European bioeconomy, the study is revealing the untapped potential of NWFPs. Below is an interview we did with Marko Lovrić from the European Forest Institute (EFI) who co-wrote the paper on behalf of BioMonitor. The EU Green Deal mentions the “Farm to Fork Strategy”. Do you think products foraged as food from forests should be included in this plan? ML: Yes, they should be included. With respect to main highlights of the Strategy, they are almost free of chemical pesticides and fertilizers, they have higher nutritional value than their agriculture-based counterparts do, and they present a healthy and sustainable diet contribution. More people are discussing the need to make our bioeconomy and our supply chain sustainable. Which SDGs will forests meet if non-wood forest products are to be accounted for? ML: The biggest difference if NWFPs are included will be in no.12 (Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns). Forests contribute to several SDGs, such as no.13 (climate action), no.6 (clean water and sanitation), and increase in agricultural productivity (no.2) can reduce pressures on forests. However, there are some SDGs that pose threat to forests and to people dependent on them, such as expansion of agricultural crops for food or energy (no.1 and 7), while development linked to economic growth (no.8) industry and infrastructure (no.9) may lead to diminished forest area. The coronavirus is changing our lives overnight. Will this affect the NWFPs as it is part of the rural livelihood in Eastern Europe and food supply chain in Western Europe? ML: It is probable that the international supply-chains of fresh NWFPs will be disrupted, which will affect rural income in Eastern Europe. Increasing prominence of NWFPs of policy agenda also means recognizing its economic potential and where this value is generated. Thus, strengthening the role of added-value NWFPs in Eastern Europe may mitigate these negative short-term effects. See the full version of the news here: http://biomonitor.eu/news/where-did-my-berries-go/

Keywords

Non-Wood Forest Production, bioeconomy, everchanging atmosphere, European Forest Institute, agriculture-based, healthy, sustainable