Objective
Much of social science models multi-person decision problems as non-cooperative games in "strategic form", where each player commits to a single optimal strategy covering all possible eventualities. Von Neumann presumes that this captures all relevant aspects of a general dynamic game. In one-player games, this paradigm entails what moral philosophers call "consequentialism", requiring behaviour to be explicable as the choice of consequences. My previous work shows that this hypothesis implies many properties treated as axioms in orthodox decision theory. Game theorists already relax this "standard paradigm" by, for example, requiring players to respond credibly when others deviate former expected behaviour.
But more drastic relaxation is needed, because in many realistic decision problems or games, the range of all possible uncertain future eventualities must expand over time to include actual events that ex ante had been entirely unpredictable, or at least outside the bounds of any practical model. Then the best current action may no longer be the one with the best pattern of uncertain consequences in the usual sense; instead, the relevant consequence patterns emerge in stages from an evolving retrospective analysis applied to an adapting decision model.
Such evolving consequences can be fitted mathematically within a coherent probabilistic framework embodying all possible relevant results of applying retrospective analysis to a sequence of increasingly detailed models. Apart from new theory, modifying the standard paradigm like this has major implications for models often used to discuss policy. As just one economic example, unforeseen crises could (and did) render unenforceable the Eurozone's original strict Maastricht treaty limits on member states budget deficits. In the end any rigid rule must be expected to break down when faced with unlikely extreme events, outside any practical model, which call for a discretionary policy response.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- engineering and technology mechanical engineering tribology lubrication
- social sciences economics and business economics macroeconomics
- humanities languages and literature literature studies literary genres essays
- natural sciences mathematics applied mathematics game theory
- social sciences economics and business business and management commerce
You need to log in or register to use this function
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
FP6-2005-MOBILITY-10
See other projects for this call
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Coordinator
COVENTRY
United Kingdom
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.