Periodic Reporting for period 1 - MART (Mucosal antibody and B cell responses during Tuberculosis)
Reporting period: 2021-03-01 to 2023-02-28
In the case of other respiratory infections, such as Influenza or COVID-19, the protective immune response induced by vaccines partly rests on the induction of pathogen-specific antibodies. However, in the case of TB, scientists still do not know whether such protective antibodies exist at the site of infection (the lung). The goal of this project was to characterise antibody responses in the lung of mycobacteria-infected mice and humans, and to assess their relationship to protection versus disease. By combining a mouse infection model with a clinical study of TB patients with different grades of TB susceptibility, the results from this project provide a sound basis for the development of mucosal airway vaccines against TB.
To link antibody specificity with antibody function, our aim was to isolate individual B cells and sequence the antibodies they encode. While this work is still in progress, we already developed in vitro infection assays that can be used to test whether a monoclonal antibody is protective against infection with mycobacteria. Here, we created fluorescent reporter strains of BCG that enable the quantification of how many bacteria are taken up by different macrophage cell population – the cell type that is a major target for Mtb at early stages of infection – and give information about the intracellular fate of mycobacteria that were taken up by macrophages. Being able to link antibody specificity with antibody function will ultimately enable to identify antibodies that can protect against infection with Mtb. Such antibodies will represent valuable research tool for the TB research community.
Lastly, we aimed to translate our findings using the mouse model back into humans. Here, the project included the use of samples from a clinical study of TB patients with different grades of TB susceptibility. By characterising what mucosal IgG antibodies bind to, we observed differences between the systemic antibody response in serum and the lung antibody response, a focus of the antibody response towards protein and polysaccharide antigens as well as an increase of antibody response correlating with the degree of exposure patients towards Mtb infection.
Moreover, the project has detected a stark difference in induction of antibody responses between different routes of vaccination with BCG. Current work is still ongoing to clarify whether different routes of vaccine administration also impact what antigens are targeted. This is highly important for the successful development of an effective vaccine because vaccine administration via different routes might improve the induction of antibody responses, and thereby, overall immune response towards immunisation.