Periodic Reporting for period 1 - FSTS (From Stick to Screen: Digital Editions of Runic Inscriptions as Research Tools)
Reporting period: 2023-01-02 to 2025-05-01
The information on runes available, in particular on the internet, is, however, of varying quality and often outdated. There are also a number of problems with digitally storing runes. Graphemics, the study of a writing system’s basic components (e.g. letters/runes), their form and function, are an important aspect of runological research. It is often relied upon for dating or geographically locating an inscription or to determine whether a runic inscription is falsified or real. Unfortunately, studies on the actual geographic distribution of runes are challenging, since several runes appear as variations of the same underlying shape (e.g. ᚢ can also appear as ᚤ, ᚥ or ᚣ). Runologists are still not certain what these variants indicate in each single case (different pronunciation; regional variants; handwriting?).
Lack of standardisation and proper systems to store runes digitally makes research into the use and geographical spread of different runic variants difficult. On the other hand, good digital representation and edition of runic inscriptions would permit completely new ways of analysing runic corpora.
The project “From Stick to Screen” will create a born-digital, interactive and open-access critical corpus edition of the runic inscriptions from the four medieval Norwegian trading towns Bergen, Trondheim, Oslo and Tønsberg.
It examines new ways of digitally editing and analysing runic inscriptions using photographic documentation and software and attempt to solve the question of how to store runes and their variations digitally, thus creating a digital repository providing reliable, quality-checked and accessible information to scholars and a public increasingly interested in runes and the Middle Ages.
As part of this work and to ensure that pictures of inscriptions, which are an important aspect of paper editions, can be included in the digital edition, about 60 inscriptions from Oslo were documented using Structured Light Scanning (SLS) and Reflective Transformation Imaging (RTI). The first method provides high-quality 3D-models of the inscriptions. The second methods provides high-quality 2D-images of the inscriptions, which offer the options of moving the light source to examine the inscription from different angles.
The photographic documentation has resulted in the first strategic study of the use of different 3D- and 2D-documentation methods on runic inscriptions not carved into stone, but wood, bone and even very fragile materials such as leather. It has yielded important knowledge and guidelines for future documentation of runic inscriptions on organic materials, where the inscription carriers are fragile and photographic documentation must take into account the preservation of the artefact.