Periodic Reporting for period 1 - WILDCARD (EFFECTS OF REWILDING IN FORESTS AND AGRICULTURAL LANDS ON CARBON SEQUESTRATION AND DIVERSITY)
Reporting period: 2024-01-01 to 2025-06-30
WILDCARD delivers the first comprehensive, multi-scale assessment of how these strategies contribute to carbon sequestration, biodiversity, and ecosystem resilience. It integrates field data, remote sensing, dynamic vegetation modelling, and soil and microbial DNA analysis to track how rewilding transforms carbon stocks above and below ground. It also evaluates how impacts vary across regions, time, and scenarios. Beyond biophysical dimensions, WILDCARD addresses political, economic, and social dynamics — exploring public perceptions, governance, trade-offs with low-intensity farming, and socio-political barriers. Stakeholder engagement runs throughout, from site-level interactions to a Europe-wide Rewilding Forum. The project applies discourse analysis, institutional mapping, and surveys to understand how citizens and decision-makers perceive rewilding, what resistance may arise, and which policies or innovations could enhance acceptance and implementation. WILDCARD will inform both science and policy by identifying where rewilding delivers high benefits with minimal trade-offs. Policy recommendations will support EU climate and biodiversity frameworks, and results will inform IPCC, the European Environment Agency, and upcoming EU policy cycles.
In its scale and ambition, WILDCARD aligns with Horizon Europe’s climate mission and Cluster 5’s Destination 1 goals. Its outputs — including open-access datasets, models, policy briefs, and stakeholder roadmaps — will equip Europe to tackle the climate-biodiversity nexus with interdisciplinary, evidence-based solutions.
WP2 and WP3 collected extensive empirical data from two major European networks: EuFoRIa (focusing on proforestation) and a set of chronosequences tracking natural reforestation of abandoned agricultural land. These networks span hundreds of sites representing diverse forest types, land-use histories, and rewilding stages. The resulting datasets quantify above- and below-ground carbon stocks, vegetation structure, and biodiversity, including soil microbiomes assessed via eDNA. In parallel, WP2 and WP3 launched high-resolution landscape-scale case studies (~50 km2, 30×30 m resolution) in key European ecoregions. These serve as dynamic ecological laboratories where models such as LandClim and FlamMap are applied to simulate ecosystem recovery and resilience under natural disturbances and climate change.
WP4 and WP5 build on these case studies to explore the social acceptability of rewilding across broader territories with varied land uses and governance settings. More specifically, WP4 completed a literature review identifying key knowledge gaps, and launched targeted surveys involving EU citizens, policymakers, and local communities. These efforts are supported by a stakeholder engagement framework (WP5) tailored to the socio-political and ecological contexts of the five selected case studies (Italy, Switzerland, Romania, Belgium, and the Czech Republic), which align with the WP2 and WP3 landscape case studies. Stakeholder mapping (WP5) was completed, enabling continuous engagement at both local and EU levels through interviews, forums, and workshops aimed at raising awareness, improving acceptability, and supporting participatory decision-making. The first EU-level WILDCARD Rewilding Forum is scheduled for October 2025. Dissemination activities include a project website, LinkedIn presence, a YouTube playlist, and a podcast series (with four episodes released). Several scientific publications have also been produced.
The project is finalizing high-resolution data collection on above-/belowground carbon stocks and multi-taxa biodiversity (WP2 & WP3), enabling unique modelling of ecosystem recovery trajectories across Europe’s ecoregions.
WILDCARD also advances knowledge of rewilding’s legal, economic, and governance dimensions. A review of laws in eight countries shows rewilding is rarely explicit in legislation, though existing tools (e.g. incentives, voluntary forest withdrawal) can be leveraged. Legal fragmentation highlights the need for EU-wide harmonization.
Cross-scale surveys and interviews with landowners, forest managers, and civil society (Tasks 4.2.2 & 4.2.4) are delivering critical insights into perceptions, resistance, and acceptance of rewilding. A novel WP5 framework addresses socio-ecological trade-offs — like heritage loss, human-wildlife conflict, and wildfire risk — tailored to each of the five socio acceptability case studies.
WILDCARD also pioneers a spatially explicit economic assessment of rewilding opportunity costs. This integrates EFISCEN-Space, the EU Forest Industry Database (EUFID), GIS-based routing (QGIS/QNEAT3), and a Python tool to identify least-cost timber transport routes and quantify trade-offs between biomass extraction and ecological restoration. This provides a decision-support tool that balances ecological goals and economic considerations across Europe’s forested landscapes.