Periodic Reporting for period 1 - DERISK (Deep lEarning foRecasting of Induced Seismicity for risK management operations)
Reporting period: 2023-07-03 to 2025-07-02
However, geothermal energy is not without risks. The process of deep drilling and fluid injection needed to exploit geothermal reservoirs can alter subsurface stress conditions and, in some cases, trigger induced seismicity. Unlike natural earthquakes, which are caused by tectonic forces, induced seismic events are directly linked to human activity and can raise concerns in densely populated or seismically sensitive areas, highlighting the seismic risk associated to this extraction. While most induced seismic events are small and not hazardous, there remains the possibility of stronger tremors that may pose safety risks and undermine public acceptance. Balancing the immense benefits of geothermal as a stable, carbon-free energy source with the careful management of seismic hazards will be central to its role in Europe’s path to a climate-neutral future.
The DERISK project aims at leveraging novel Deep-Learning (DL) techniques to tackle the challenges of monitoring seismic activity at geothermal sites (both enhanced and natural) and reduce the risks associated with operational tasks (i.e. injection and extraction of fluids). In particular, it seeks to develop next-generation software and methods for creating enhanced microseismicity catalogs (EMC) and forecasting the maximum magnitude expected in a short-time window.
The impact of this project could lead to new strategies to be embedded to the well-known and widely used decision-making scheme (i.e. Traffic Light System, TLS) for safer energy extraction, thereby promoting and helping the spread of EGS deployment in Europe.
On the forecasting side, we evaluated the potential of foundation models for time series, in particular Google-TimesFM, applied to the open-access seismic catalog of injection testing at the FORGE site (Utah, USA). Initial results are promising: the model performs best when magnitude prediction is coupled with related operational parameters such as injection volume, fluid density, or pressure. This suggests that while forecasting based on magnitude time-series data alone remains limited (almost random) and physics-agnostic, multi-source time series can support more reliable and “educated” predictions of maximum expected seismicity. The outcomes of this work have been presented at international conferences and discussed with peers both inside and outside academia.
To secure further uptake and sustained performance, we identify the following priorities: (i) a continual‑learning framework for both seismic detection and magnitude/time‑series forecasting, enabling periodic or streaming retraining as new data arrive and conditions evolve; (ii) robust domain‑adaptation mechanisms to manage site/network drift and preserve inference accuracy in production; and (iii) systematic evaluation across diverse networks to quantify generalisation and guide targeted updates. Together, these steps will close the loop between operations and model improvement, supporting the adaptive and reliable deployment of deliverables.