Periodic Reporting for period 1 - CO3 (COntinuous COnstruction of resilient social COntracts through societal transformations (CO3))
Reporting period: 2024-02-01 to 2025-04-30
CO3 develops a model and an extensive knowledge base, which enables anticipatory policymaking and supports sensemaking on the construction, dimensions and resilience of social contracts. Central to CO3’s approach are empirical case studies in Finland, Germany, France, Portugal, France, Hungary, Croatia, Bulgaria,Turkey, Ukraine and Bosnia-Herzegovina. CO3 develops scenarios to recognise the mechanisms for reconstruction and safeguards for strengthening democratic social contracts, and generates understanding of how new social contracts can be safeguarded.
The project considers the continuous construction of social contracts over time and across three time scales: 1) Any apprehension of a social contract must analyse attempt to grasp long-term debates around the original establishment of a collective contract in history. 2) Contracts however are not just established as one-time events, but must also be regularly renewed, especially in the face of exclusions from the originary contract and demands of new members. Across the medium term, an open social contract must remain flexible, able to integrate previously excluded populations, and remain open to new populations and new groups, organisations or identities. 3) It is an essential claim of this approach to continual contract construction that momentary flashpoints or crises may be used to help build a stronger contractual model for members.
CO3 is committed to promoting citizen involvement, ecological transformation, and wellbeing by advocating for democratic, inclusive, and open social contracts. Exploitation activities result in the CO3 model of social contract; a guidebook in support of this application; and policy recommendations to embed its implementation in the relevant policy landscape. As a result, lay citizens, young people, researchers and policymakers, will better understand the determinants of successful social contracts.
In project organisation, all practices, infrastructure and governance structure were established and are now in place. The project is highly collaborative in nature, and the joint ways of working have been developed and grounded over the first year. The consortium successfully completed two General Assemblies with content working sessions, and additional joint working sessions in Paris for WP2.
Two international conferences were organised: the first one was organised by AUP in Paris in December 2024, and additionally CO3 was among the organisers of the 5th Helsinki Conference on Emotions Populism and Polarisation, HEPP5, where social contract was the main theme. The consortium members also took part in the ECPR General Conference with presentations of CO3 research, and successfully submitted a Section proposal for the next year's conference with several panels discussing social contracts. Several consortium members are also joining the International Political Science Association's conference in Seoul after successful paper - and panel submissions.
On impact creation, some of the major achievements include the collaboration with PLEDGE and MORES projects for EP2024. This included data gathering and sharing effort and the participation in the first PLEDGE conference in Brussels, participation at the PROTEMO kick-off in January 2024 already their first conference in Saarland in June 2024.
The outcomes of the theoretical work include the initial resilience model of the social contract based on a thorough engagement with theory, and an initial framework for understanding how the theoretical and empirical legacies of social contracts can come together through upcoming research. The work on addressing the democratic decline and polarisation theoretically has continued through empirical country cases. We also conducted a major overview of political communication across Europe, using thorough analysis and deep observations of the European Elections in 2024 across different political orientations and in 8 (total 10) countries. While the deliverables in WP4 have been submitted, this will be unpacked further in the project's other WPs. This offered a backbone for all country teams for understanding contestation in contemporary Europe. It offers a database for further research in several consortia. Compared to the state of the art datasets, this is a particularly rich one.