Nine new national BIOEAST HUBs were launched, building on the BIOEAST HUB Handbook (D2.1) which provided shared operational procedures, stakeholder engagement techniques, and best practices. Two pre-existing HUBs expanded their networks accordingly. Using the LogFrame methodology, all eleven HUBs and seven TWGs had prepared their roadmaps for the first two years. The project’s new website was launched, serving as a central communication platform that regularly shares updates on HUB kick-offs and national events, while also providing dedicated HUB mini-sites, accessible in both English and national languages. In addition to the 11 HUB mini-sites, the Knowledge Platform was launched, featuring over 170 materials in national languages, supporting both knowledge sharing and HUB-level outreach. Complementing this, WP7 led the co-design of the AP methodology which was tested and finalized in D7.1. This methodology guides the HUBs in structuring national AP workshops. So far, three HUBs (SI, HR, LT) have organised their first AP workshops. The TWGs organised seven science-policy webinars aligned with their thematic priorities. Preparations for the OIC began with co-design workshops, and finalization of eight thematic challenges and a promotional plan. The OIC received 43 proposals aiming to identify key bioeconomy challenges across the macro-region. In parallel, the multidimensional assessment of bioeconomy competences, innovation systems, biomass availability, and educational needs was initiated. The methodology for mapping competences and biomass (D3.1) was tested and applied in 10 HUB countries. WP4 completed the mapping of national and EU bioeconomy strategies, innovation indicators, and funding instruments, consolidated in D4.1 which also supports the development of APs. WP5 completed the education needs assessment (D5.1) informing recommendations for the UniNet. Two major Bioeconomy Conferences were organised fostering stakeholder exchange and partnerships with 20+ EU bioeconomy projects also hosting one international policy dialogue focusing on the policy implications of the multidimensional assessment results.