Project description
The paradox of semantic congruity in cognition
In daily life, we constantly rely on the relationships between elements in our environment (referred to as semantic information) to interact efficiently with the world. This information can simplify understanding by reinforcing familiar patterns or capture attention by highlighting unexpected elements. The challenge lies in the dual nature of this information, raising questions about how and when the brain draws on stored semantic knowledge. The ERC-funded CONNECTS project addresses this cognitive paradox by offering a unified framework based on the Transfer Appropriate Processing principle. By examining neural representations, it explores how cognitive computations align with semantic congruity. Ultimately, the project aims to reconcile conflicting evidence across cognitive domains with an integrative solution.
Objective
In our everyday lives, we rely on existing relations among elements in our environment (i.e. semantic information) to interact efficiently with the world. This information can either be used to facilitate understanding by exploiting redundant (congruent) evidence or to signal out salient stimuli by highlighting unexpected (incongruent) elements. This duality raises fundamental questions about how and when our brains utilize stored semantic knowledge as its influence seems to vary depending on the specific cognitive domain. This seemingly paradoxical state represents a cognitive puzzle that questions whether the presence of (in)congruent contextual information in a given situation has a positive or negative impact on how we perceive, process, and remember information.
CONNECTS seeks to address the paradoxical effects of semantic congruity across various cognitive domains by providing a unified framework. The proposed framework builds on the Transfer Appropriate Processing principle and brings it to a neural representational level. By examining the transformations of neural representations, it is possible to quantify the degree of overlap in cognitive computations as a measure of appropriate transfer. Thus, CONNECTS dissolves the paradox by proposing that performance would be optimal when the required cognitive computation is oriented towards the same stimulus properties emphasized by the semantic (in)congruity of the stimulus. This proposal not only reconciles conflicting evidence on specific domains but also provides a domain-agnostic framing of the conundrum that ensures its integrative aim.
CONNECTS combines a solid theoretical foundation with cutting-edge neuroscientific techniques. The project's multi-method approach, including behavioural, neural (fMRI and EEG), and computational data from artificial neural networks. This approach offers a comprehensive exploration of the phenomenon which is a core requirement for a unifying framework.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
This project has not yet been classified with EuroSciVoc.
Be the first one to suggest relevant scientific fields and help us improve our classification service
You need to log in or register to use this function
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
HORIZON.1.1 - European Research Council (ERC)
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
HORIZON-ERC - HORIZON ERC Grants
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) ERC-2024-STG
See all projects funded under this callHost institution
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
18071 GRANADA
Spain
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.