Project description
When disinformation becomes a threat to LGBTI+ rights
Disinformation online is increasingly weaponised against LGBTI+ populations. In turn, governments have come to frame the problem as one of security at the expense of democracy and human rights. How are LGBTI+ rights becoming entangled in this global attempt at disinformation governance? Supported by the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions programme, the SECURE project seeks to answer this question. With a focus on Poland and Brazil (two countries with high levels of polarisation and rising anti-LGBTI+ rhetoric), researchers will examine how far security narratives from the anti-disinformation community carry over into LGBTI+ rights. The project aims to set a new vision of LGBTI+ governance as it moves from equality to protection.
Objective
In recent years, promoting LGBTI+ rights and countering disinformation have become pressing priorities for several Western governments. Due to the potential for disinformation to fuel discrimination, hostility, and violence against vulnerable groups, these two objectives are increasingly intersecting in local, regional, and international political processes. To regulate disinformation, particularly on social media, state actors worldwide have primarily resorted to a security rhetoric, presenting the issue as an existential threat to security, human rights, democracy, and the rule of law. While many scholars have explored how disinformation campaigns are impacting the advancement of LGBTI+ rights, we still know very little about how this specific agenda has been incorporated to justify the securitisation of disinformation. Even less is known about the role LGBTI+ civil society has played in this process—a sector that is highly affected by the spread of false narratives but is also increasingly reliant on the services provided by these platforms to connect with the community, launch awareness campaigns, and raise funds. How they position themselves vis à vis the state, private sector and other actors in the regulation process? And how is the engagement in this field shaping the claims of LGBTI+ organisations for “protection”? SECURE will analyse how the security discourses and practices from the anti-disinformation field are spilling over into LGBTI+ rights. Through a comparative study between Poland and Brazil, two countries that have recently experienced intense polarisation around LGBTI+ rights related to the spread of disinformation, the project will develop a transferable theoretical framework to analyse multilevel security spillover processes and theorise about the current shift from “equality” to “protection” in “LGBTI+ governance”—the ways in which LGBTI+ people and ideas are incorporated into state, state-like, and state-affiliated power.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
This project's classification has been human-validated.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
This project's classification has been human-validated.
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
HORIZON.1.2 - Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA)
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
HORIZON-TMA-MSCA-PF-EF - HORIZON TMA MSCA Postdoctoral Fellowships - European Fellowships
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) HORIZON-MSCA-2024-PF-01
See all projects funded under this callCoordinator
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
WC1E 6BT LONDON
United Kingdom
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.