Objective
The Local Operating Network (LON) technology is one of the worldwide most common network solutions for automation control in buildings. The technology, described in the standards ANSI/EIA-709 and prEN14908 is based on a non-proprietary interoperable fieldbus system, which is currently implemented in a large percentage of all train-stations, airports, hospitals, office towers, and other buildings of public interest.
Recent political and technical developments have increased the need to establish a technology for safety related and secure data communication with automation systems. A new international standard IEC 61508 has been implemented that defines the requirements for functional safety related applications of programmable electronic systems. A feasibility study has shown that safety features can be directly integrated into already existing LON communication structures by developing a safety chip and adapting the respective tools to control a safety network. At the moment all solutions require the installation of additional communication lines, causing extra costs that usually are prohibitive for carrying out such a project.
Despite the need for the integration of this safety feature and the potential impact on society and building automation the development and integration of the safety concept cannot be pursued without collective research efforts. The LON-community is formed mainly by SMEs. The development of a non-proprietary and interoperable platform technology to incorporate the safety feature is beyond the capabilities of single enterprises and the goal can only be achieved by mobilising the respective synergies. The European LON user community is organised in national IAGs. Within SAFETYLON the national user organisations of Germany, Sweden and Poland are coordinating their activities and consequently guarantee a direct distribution of the RTD results to all European LON technology and application providers.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- natural sciences computer and information sciences software software applications system software operating systems
- engineering and technology electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering electronic engineering control systems
- social sciences sociology industrial relations automation
You need to log in or register to use this function
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
FP6-2003-SME-2
See other projects for this call
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Coordinator
AACHEN
Germany
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
Participants (16)
KRAKOW
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
EMPOLI
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
BEVAIX
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
DORTMUND
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
THUN
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
ROSENGARTEN
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
ERKELENZ
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
BACKNANG
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
MÖLNDAL
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
VIENNA
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
COLOMIERS
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
NORSBORG
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
KRAKOW
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
VIENNA
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
LÜBECK
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
KRAKOW
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.