Objective
How is information about external stimuli or planned motor commands coded and communicated between different brain regions? This question is one of the most fundamental open questions in neuroscience, and addressing it is likely to revolutionize the field of neural-prosthetic devices. In particular, it will significantly improve the quality of life of the many thousands in need of cochlear implants. Furthermore, the creation of effective motor brain-machine interfaces relies heavily on advances in this field. One hypothesis for the neural code is the Winner-Take-All (WTA) readout, in which activity of single cells, rather than large populations of neurons, shapes behavior. It has been suggested that WTA is used in several brain regions, in particular the middle-temporal (MT) cortex, in which the activity of single cells can account for the observed behavior. However, the computational capabilities of WTA have received little theoretical attention. Therefore, it remains unclear to what extent WTA can account for the observed activity in the brain, particularly in the MT region. I propose to conduct extensive theoretical study of WTA. I will quantify the accuracy of WTA and study the effects of the network architecture, empirically observed noise-correlations, inherent neuronal heterogeneity and different coding strategies, all of which have been shown to considerably affect the accuracy of other readout hypotheses. In addition to studying the conventional WTA, I will construct a novel temporal-code generalization of WTA that can take into account the fine temporal structure of neural responses. My preliminary results show that this readout is superior to the conventional WTA in both accuracy and speed of computation. The primary goal of this research is to obtain quantitative estimates of the accuracy of WTA that will enable us to test its feasibility as readout utilized by the central nervous system by comparing it to the psychophysical accuracy.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: https://op.europa.eu/en/web/eu-vocabularies/euroscivoc.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: https://op.europa.eu/en/web/eu-vocabularies/euroscivoc.
- natural sciences biological sciences neurobiology
- medical and health sciences medical biotechnology implants
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
FP7-PEOPLE-IRG-2008
See other projects for this call
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Coordinator
84105 Beer Sheva
Israel
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.