Objective
The metal-mechanic sector (turnover 970 billion ? a year) represents 8% of the total EU business. Welding is the most important joining technique in this sector; there are about 730,000 full time and 5.5 million welding related jobs in Europe. A threat is that welding is moved to low wages countries, leading to a decrease in European welding and welding related jobs with 3% each year (meaning 165,000 people). Welding has a great impact on health for it is physically high demanding leading to a high percenta ge of sick leave (yearly about 160 working hours per welder). The high sick leave costs are threatening the financial position of SMEs, endangering their competitiveness. ECONWELD will stop the downward spiral in which welding is at the moment, by: 1. Red uction of welding costs by 15-20% and improvement of production by 10-15 % The project comes up with solutions for (flexible) mechanisation of welding, The benefits of alternative (high speed and/or high deposition) welding processes will be demonstrated. 2. Reduction of sick leave of welders of 50 % and improvement of production by 10-15 % This will be achieved by an improvement of the organisation at welding. Reducing sick leave will pay off 80 hours, meaning 10 working days per welder per year. An imp roved productivity by 10-15 % will be possible by the development of new solutions to improve the work conditions (ergonomics and work flow). 3. Reduction of exposure to welding fumes of 30 % for GMAW welding and 20 % for other processes. Solutions will be found to reduce welding fumes at the source, a smart exhaust arm moving to the exact welding spot, a helmet with sensors indicating when the fume concentrations exceed safety limits and prototypes of welding torches with better ergonomics including fume e xtraction. Decrease of MAC value from 5,5 to 3,5 mg/m3. The results obtained in ECONWELD will give SMEs in Europe a better competitiveness as well as welding a better image of the profession.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- social sciences economics and business economics production economics productivity
- engineering and technology electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering electronic engineering sensors
- social sciences psychology ergonomics
You need to log in or register to use this function
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
FP6-2003-SME-2
See other projects for this call
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Coordinator
DELFT
Netherlands
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
Participants (18)
NOTTINGHAM
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
VIRLE P.TE TORINO
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
GENOVA
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
BRATISLAVA
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
OEIRAS
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
BUDAPEST
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
MATOSINHOS
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
LISBOA
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
GLIWICE
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
GENOVA
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
HORICE V PODKRKONOSI
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
LISBOA
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
ANNONE BRIANZA
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
VOORSCHOTEN
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
RONCO SCRIVIA
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
GLIWICE
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
GENOVA
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
ALBLASSERDAM
See on map
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.