Periodic Reporting for period 2 - TAMS4CPS (Trans-Atlantic Modelling and Simulation For Cyber-Physical Systems)
Reporting period: 2016-02-01 to 2017-01-31
For Europe to benefit from growth in CPS, while avoiding the pitfalls that such complexity creates, there must be advances in the modelling and simulation (M&S) capability for CPS design and operation. Collaborative research with the US will be an opportunity to advance European M&S capabilities for CPS.
The overall aim of TAMS4CPS is to lay the foundations for concrete EU-US collaboration in modelling and simulation for cyber-physical systems.
The aim was achieved by successfully addressing the following objectives:
• To define the scope of CPS for US and Europe and, based on this, an agreed scope for collaboration
• To identify priority research and development needs for modelling and simulation for cyber-physical systems
• To create a strategic research agenda for collaboration in modelling and simulation for cyber-physical systems, which is endorsed by European and US industry and academia
• To provide key enablers for Trans-Atlantic collaboration in modelling and simulation for cyber-physical systems
• To disseminate the findings of the project to the research and user communities in both the European Union and the US
The TAMS4CPS Support Action realised the aim by creating:
• A strategic research and collaboration agenda, agreed by researchers in EU and US
• A set of test cases for use by model developers to perform collaborative evaluation
• A state of the art report supported by web-based information to act as a baseline for collaborative research
The relationship of CPS to Systems of Systems (SoS) and the Internet of Things (IoT) has been defined, as shown in figure 1 and the type of CPS problems that must be modelled are shown in figure 2, in terms of increasing complexity.
The primary output of TAMS4CPS is a Strategic Research Agenda for Collaboration (SRAC) between EU and US in the area of M&S for CPS, which covers both the technical areas of interest and also the mechanisms through which collaborative endeavours may be pursued. The following recommendations have been published:
Recommendations to EC
1. The EC should work with appropriate US funding agencies to create test beds for CPS and to create suitable collaborative structures for effective joint exploitation of existing test beds.
2. For jointly funded activities between the EU and US, the EC should target US funding agencies whose support focuses on applied research at Technology Readiness Levels above fundamental science.
3. The EC and appropriate US funding agencies should take deliberate action to simplify the framework for trans-Atlantic collaboration by adopting best practice, as exemplified in the EU-NIH agreement.
4. The EC should establish a joint project with US agencies to create a common plan for collaborative CPS development and should ensure a single point of contact for US stakeholders.
5. As a matter of urgency, Europe and the US should collaborate on CPS-related standards to protect their industries from the imposition of standards from elsewhere.
6. The EC should increase the funding of researcher mobility between EU and US, including mainstreaming this in future EIT KICs.
Recommendations to researchers and EC
7. The EC should promote joint programmes in the technical areas described in the agenda (below)
8. European researchers should seek to identify and collaborate with US leaders in the technical areas identified in the agenda (below)
The technical areas are the following seven themes:
• Theme 1: Test beds are mainly required for ensuring interoperability between CPS and for verification either of models or of the CPS themselves.
• Theme 2: Inclusion of human factors in modelling and simulation.
• Theme 3: Open framework for model interoperability.
• Theme 4: Incorporation of security architectural features into models.
• Theme 5: Combining formal verification and simulation technology.
• Theme 6: An evolutionary approach to testing and evaluation of adaptive / resilient CPS.
• Theme 7: Big-data analytics modelling via machine learning.
State of the Art
An analysis of state of the art (SoA) in M&S for CPS has been published as a report supported by an online database. It should be noted that this analysis covers the areas for collaboration and is not supposed to be a generally applicable SoA for this area. Certain areas whilst important for research are not appropriate for collaborative activity.
CPS Test Cases for M&S
TAMS4CPS defined characteristics of good test cases that could be used as an initiator of collaboration (e.g. for comparison between different modelling techniques) and has documented four publically available test cases applicable to a number of Modelling and Simulation approaches. The test cases are:
• Katrina response test case
• Toyota powertrain benchmark (S-TALIRO) test case
• Artificial pancreas device system test case
• Cooperative driving test case
There are two major technical issues to be resolved through collaborative activity. The first concerns the need for test beds to develop and validate models and the CPS themselves. This is required by researchers on both sides of the Atlantic and the impact of increasing access to test beds will likely enable small and medium enterprises to develop CPS more rapidly. The second major issue is verification; the complexity and size of CPS requiring verification activities make traditional verification approaches untenable. New approaches to verification of CPS are desperately needed. Collaborative activity towards a new paradigm for verification could lead to much more rapid deployment of CPS, provided a new paradigm is possible in the commercial world.