Periodic Reporting for period 2 - PROPERA (The Profanation of Opera: Music and Drama on Film)
Reporting period: 2019-03-01 to 2020-02-29
My research led to a new perspective regarding the periodization of the history of the interaction between opera and film. It became clear that the encounter between the two genres and media occurred against the background of preoccupations with their evolving prominence, prestige, and popularity. It can be said that a first major period (up to the post-II World War years) evolved under the aegis of cinema’s “anxiety of influence”: the new art had first and foremost to guarantee its autonomy and looked at opera as an eminent precursor whose legacy it aspired to prolong and enrich), whereas a second major period lasted over the whole second half of the twentieth-century under the aegis of opera’s “anxiety of survival”: under the pressure of modernism, opera experienced a major crisis and seemed threatened in its existence, therefore leading to the generalized idea that film could provide opera with a means of survival, renewal, or resurrection (a process that was exacerbated in the 1970s and 1980, the golden age of opera films). In this context, a new, third period can be said to begin around 2000, when for the first time composers and librettists turn to pre-existing movies as a source of inspiration for their musical-theatrical collaborations.
My research also proposes a new vocabulary to analyze opera on screen, one that starts by recognizing that the task of filming the staging of an opera cannot be equated with that of filming an opera (which also implies that filming an opera has more in common with staging an opera than with filming the staging of an opera). With regard to videos of opera stagings, I advocate a close liaison between the “remediating video” and the “remediated staging”, while also avoiding the fetishism of liveness that tends to infiltrate the debate on the remediation of opera. In other words, I claim that the true opposition is not between liveness and mediatization but rather between a “traditional” and a “critical” way of fostering their interaction.
With regard to purely cinematic objects, I organized my research around thematic constellations (around topics such as spectatorship; technological reproduction; class, gender, and sexuality). I was particularly keen to distinguish different conceptions of “operaticness” that pervade the above-mentioned topics and to shed light on the fact that some of them do not include sonic characteristics. This led to yet a another conclusion: that the “boom” of the opera film in the 1970s and 1980s can actually be explained by the overcoming of the so-called “great divide” between high art and mass culture that also favored intermediality, parodist and ironic approaches, and technological reproduction. In my research I demonstrate that opera played a crucial role in this debate, which in turn contributed to a new perception of opera that paved the way to more recent developments: including the live cinecast phenomenon since 2006 and the multiplication of new operas based on films (a slow trend that started around 2000 but only now is being recognized as such).