Objective
There has been a growing concern in public and academia about rising wealth inequality. In his book Capital in the 21st Century, Thomas Piketty has proposed implementing a global progressive “wealth tax” in order to reduce wealth inequality. The book has spurred discussions on wealth inequality and made taxation of wealth a subject of current debate.
Wealth can be taxed by different means. While most countries tax income from wealth (capital income tax), some countries have also taxed wealth stock (wealth tax). Given that capital income tax is already used as a means to tax wealth in many countries, what would be the gain in using wealth tax instead or on top of capital income tax? This is one of the main questions that this proposal addresses. Despite the fact that many papers have studied whether it is desirable to tax wealth, the previous literature has been silent about whether capital income or wealth stock should be taxed. This was because most of the previous papers have made the strong assumption that everyone in the economy earns the same rate of return on wealth. Under this assumption, it turns out that capital income and wealth taxes are equivalent. Thus, the previous literature could not provide any rationale for or against using wealth tax instead or on top of capital income tax.
The broad objective of this project is to study quantitatively the optimal structure of taxes on wealth and its implications for wealth inequality, economic efficiency, and overall economic welfare by constructing a framework that includes rate of return heterogeneity and other features emphasized to be important in determination of wealth inequality.
Wealth taxation is a subject of current debate not only in academia but also in policy circles. This project contributes to this debate by providing a rigorous analysis that enhances understanding of determinants of wealth inequality and the structure of optimal taxes, and providing guidance for government policy.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- social sciences economics and business business and management entrepreneurship
- social sciences sociology social issues social inequalities
- social sciences economics and business economics production economics productivity
- social sciences sociology governance taxation
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
H2020-EU.1.3. - EXCELLENT SCIENCE - Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme -
H2020-EU.1.3.2. - Nurturing excellence by means of cross-border and cross-sector mobility
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
MSCA-IF-EF-ST - Standard EF
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) H2020-MSCA-IF-2016
See all projects funded under this callCoordinator
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
50014 Fiesole
Italy
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.