Diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer are currently performed in several steps. During the diagnosis, the tumor tissues are imaged with either mammography or ultrasound. Following the initial identification of the tumor, the malignancy is determined with biopsy. Similarly, during cancer resection surgeries, the excised sample should be analyzed by a pathology specialist to ensure complete removal of the malignant tissue, named Frozen Section Analysis (FSA). Both FSA and biopsy requires a specialist, time-consuming, and costly. The failure of the pathology in diagnosis may cause the growth and spread of the malignant tumor. Pathological failure during resection surgeries may cause the recurrence of the disease. In fact, many breast cancer patients go through radical mastectomy, which entails complete removal of the breast, to minimize the recurrence risk despite several severe complications.
One technique that can emerge as an alternative to the pathology during diagnosis and treatment is the open-ended contact probe method. This technique is currently available for laboratory use. Due to the inherent dielectric property discrepancy between the malignant and benign tissues, the application of this technique as a biopsy device was envisioned in the literature. However, the biopsy application of the probe was overlooked due to the high measurement error rate of the technique.
The improvement in the diagnosis and treatment techniques for breast cancer can aid the correct/early diagnosis of the disease. Similarly, enabling an automated decision-making system that can characterize the tissue type would both decrease the human error and the cost of analysis. Such a device can be deployed to rural areas to determine the malignancies in the physician’s office.
The main goal of the project is to enable the practical usage of open-ended contact probe technique by decreasing the dielectric property measurement error. This can be done by addressing the error sources of the system which includes,
• introducing a new mathematical approach,
• optimizing the probe structure,
• adopting Machine Learning algorithms,
• verifying the modifications with in vivo experiments.
Commercial probes are reporting an error rate of 5% in a laboratory environment while in the literature measurement error reported as high as 30% for a practical setting. By implementing the above-listed objectives, we can address the error sources while enabling the practical application of the technique.