Periodic Reporting for period 2 - MOTIVATE (Matrix Optimization for Testing by Interaction of Virtual And Test Environments)
Reporting period: 2018-12-01 to 2020-05-31
i. to develop a robust and repeatable method for the quantification of uncertainties in measurements using digital image correlation in an industrial environment,
ii. to produce advanced structural test protocols with an associated methodology for validation of simulation data, and
iii. to deploy the validation methods and test protocols in a demonstration during a structural test case.
The project was a response to Innovation Action JTI-CS2-2016-CFP04-AIR-02-32 entitled 'Testing Matrix Optimisation by Interaction between Numerical Modelling & Innovative Non-Contact Measurement Technology' within Work Package B 3.3.2 of Technology Stream B3: Advanced Integrated Structures in the ITD Airframe of the Clean Sky Joint Technology Initiative. Specifically, the intention was to improve and develop the existing methodologies for quantifying uncertainty in measurements of displacement and strain field, and in parallel, to progress and mature the current methodologies for correlating predicted and measured data fields in order to provide a simple-to-use and robust approach to validating computational models. Enabling technologies, which had been demonstrated in laboratory conditions during a series of EU FP 5 and 7 projects, including SPOTS [No. G6RD-CT-2002-00856]; ADVISE [No. 218595] and VANESSA [No. NMP3-SA-2012-319116], have been refined, developed and transitioned into the industrial environment and demonstrated in a structural test on an aircraft subcomponent (a 1 sq.m fuselage panel) and on an aircraft -scale (a cockpit section) at the Topic Manager’s site [Airbus in Toulouse]. The outcomes of the project are:
A. A methodology for the validation of simulation tools in structural mechanics;
B. A procedure for the quantification of measurement uncertainty in digital image correlation;
C. Protocols and best practice for validation methodology for subcomponents; and
D. Test cases demonstrating 'double-blind' deployment of protocols and implementation of validation methodology.
In conclusion, the robust protocols for validation will enhance confidence and credibility in computational simulations of structures, and thus, enable light-weight, more reliable, elegant designs to be brought to the marketplace faster and at lower costs by reducing the number of tests required to develop high fidelity models of new designs of aircraft structures. Light-weight, elegant structures are essential in realising the EU and Clean Sky environmental and other goals.
A. A methodology for the validation of simulation tools in structural mechanics including a new validation metric which quantifies the probability that a field of predictions belongs to the same population as a field of measurements given a quantified measurement uncertainty;
B. A new procedure for the quantification of measurement uncertainty in digital image correlation (DIC) for use in industrial environments which can be implemented for any DIC system using a calibration target and provides fields of uncertainty describing the measurement uncertainty for the displacement components measured in the field of view of the system;
C. Protocols and best practice for validation methodology applicable to subcomponents described in a good practice guide and summarised in a flowchart that is incorporated in a Graphical User Interface (GUI) to aid the test engineer in the implementation of the methodology, and which allows the consideration of historical data for validation as well as the standard approach of conducting tests specifically for the purpose of validation; and
D. Test cases, at the sub-component and aircraft level, demonstrating 'double-blind' deployment of protocols and implementation of the validation methodology. The aircraft-scale industrial demonstrator comprised a full-scale front nose section of an aircraft fuselage and included the implementation of the procedure for quantification of measurement uncertainty, the use of the best practice guide and flowchart, and the evaluation of the predictions using the new validation metric.
Three manuscripts for publication in archived journals have been prepared based on the implementation of the new method for quantification of measurement uncertainty, the implementation of the validation protocol and metric on a sub-component (fuselage panel), and the demonstration of the new technologies on the full-scale aircraft fuselage. In addition, 13 presentations have been made at 7 conferences, 12 blog posts have been produced, 4 workshops have been organised, and 3 videos posted in the project website at www.engineeringvalidation.org.
It was decided that commercial exploitation of the new technologies was neither appropriate nor viable; and, hence, exploitation is being pursued through its incorporation in pre-standard documentation. Work is underway to produce a CEN Technical Report.