Skip to main content

Organizing, Promoting and ENabling HEritage Re-use through Inclusion, Technology, Access, Governance and Empowerment

Deliverables

Video report of the Observatory Cases

This deliverable provides a video report of all Observatory Cases, based on the site visits and interviews. It tells the story of Observatory Cases in a format that is easy to access and to disseminate to broader audiences; it is linked to Task 2.1

Complex database of adaptive heritage reuse

This online database showcases the results of the institutional analysis and the Observatory Cases in a searchable structure; linked to Task 2.3, is a key deliverable

Heritage Point to support the adaptive reuse of heritage assets (first version)

The six Heritage Points will be launched as part of the OpenHeritage homepage in a draft version and will be refined as the CHLs progress. The deliverable is linked to Task 5.2.

Project website

The deliverable is the project website that will serve as a tool of the operation of CHLs (related to D5.2), to host the results of WP1 and WP2 in form of a database, provide a basis for communication about the project by showcasing information about the partners, project news and events and publications. It will also have a specific area dedicated to internal communication. The deliverable is linked to Task 6.1

Inception report

The report will summarize the main experiences of the kick-off meeting and project set up, and will include the main management guidelines for the implementation period.

Detailed workplan for WP2

This deliverable refines and summarises the work to be conducted in WP2, serves as a guideline for the WP leader and participants; related to Task 2.1

Detailed workplan of WP5

The deliverable refines and summarizes the work to be conducted in WP5. It will serve as a guideline for the WP leader and the participants, and is linked to Task 5.1

Individual report on the Observatory Cases

The deliverable analyses of financial, business and governance models, mechanisms of community involvement and territorial impact of individual Observatory Cases; comparison of the Cases along the same criteria, against the background of various regulatory and policy environments; it is linked to Task 2.1 and is a key deliverable

Submitted evaluation framework

This deliverable guides the complex evaluation process; is linked to Task 3. 1

Report on the comparative analysis of Observatory Cases

This deliverable creates a comparative overview of the 16 Observatory Cases along the 3 main criteria of inclusive heritage re-use; is linked to Task 2.2

Interim report on the regional and territorial integration evaluation

This report provides input for D 3.6; it is linked Task3. 4,

Detailed workplan of WP4

It refines and summarizes the work to be conducted in WP4, and it will serve as a guideline for the WP leader and the participants. The deliverable is linked to Task 4.1

Updated Local Action Plans

The report will detail per CHL the good practices, problems and changes to be carried out, and will include an updated and more complex LAP for each CHL. The deliverable is linked to Task 4.1. The individual reports are prepared by the partners responsible for the CHLs, under the leadership of MRI.

Dissemination and knowledge sharing strategy

The deliverable outlines the strategy for the dissemination activities of the project. It is linked to Task 6.1.

Transferability report about the Observatory Cases

Focusing solely on the 16 Observatory Cases, this deliverable examines how wide spread the models used in the Observatory Cases are, and how much their operation depends on the specific local circumstances; linked to Task 2.4

Interim report on the evaluation of resource integrtaion

This report provides input for D 3.6; is linked to Task 3.3

Local Action Plans of the Cooperative Heritage Labs

The deliverable consist of six separate reports that lay down the foundations of the work to be done in the framework of the Cooperative Heritage Labs, and in each case it attempts to draw a preliminary model of inclusive heritage management. The deliverable is linked to Task 4.1, thus the lead beneficiary is MRI. However, the individual reports are prepared by the partners responsible for the Cooperative Heritage Labs.

Typology of current adaptive heritage reuse policies

The deliverable highlights the national/regional differences, points to their embeddedness into the socio-economic and institutional framework of a particular country, related to Task 1.4

Finalized report on the European adaptive reuse management practices

This report provides a finalized summary of the adaptive reuse practices with an emphasis on bottlenecks and good practices, focusing on community and multi-stakeholder integration, resource integration and regional/territorial impacts. It is linked Task 3.1.

Detailed work plan for WP1

Detailed work plan for WP1 - refines and summarizes the work to be conducted in WP1, will serve as a guideline for the WP leader and the participants, linked to Task 1.1

Interim Progress Report of the Cooperative Heritage Labs

The structured report will create a summary of progress about the CHLs, combining general level summaries with a short overview about how the individual CHLs have developed.

Interim report on the community involvement and governance evaluation

This report provides input for D 3.6; is linked to Task 3.2

Detailed work plan for WP3

This deliverable refines and summarises the work to be conducted in WP3, serves as a guideline for the WP leader and participants; is linked to Task 3.1

Complex policy overview of adaptive heritage reuse

It combines the existing policy and legal regulations of adaptive re-use, funding and economic environment and current adaptive reuse practice, points out major bottlenecks but also regulations that work very well – synthetizes inputs from Tasks 1.1.- 1.3, responsibility of Task 1.1, It is a key deliverable

Publications

Curating the City: Artistic Practices and Urban Transformations

Author(s): Cristina Garzillo
Published in: European Journal of Creative Practices in Cities and Landscapes, Issue Vol.3 No.1, 2020, Page(s) p. 139-148, ISSN 2612-0496
DOI: 10.6092/issn.2612-0496/v3-n1-2020

Opening up heritage : beyond a conceptualization as object or process.

Author(s): Karim van Knippenberg
Published in: Opening up the planning landscape : 15 years of actor-relational approaches to spatial planning in Flanders, the Netherlands and beyond, 2020, Page(s) 343-350
DOI: 10.17418/b.2020.9789491937446

Who cares?(forthcoming)

Author(s): Loes Veldpaus
Published in: IHBC year book, Issue annual, 2021

A lengyel Versaillets (The Polish Versailles)

Author(s): Alexandra Cwik and Jozsef Laszlovszky
Published in: Várak, kastélyok, templomok (Castles, Palaces, Churches), Issue August, 2018, 2018, Page(s) 40-44, ISSN 1786-7150

Exploring Public-Private-Community Partnerships in Governing Cultural Heritage Adaptive Reuse Projects

Author(s): de Nictolis, Elena and Iaione, Christian and Pangallozzi, Maria Cristina and Piperno, Alessandro,
Published in: SSRN - Social Science Research Network repository, 2021