To fulfil the study objectives, a comprehensive literature review was completed in the first few months of the study. This helped develop the right intervention contents (vicarious contact promoting integration views) and the study measures in the next few months. Then Ethics Clearance was obtained from The Sciences & Technology Cross-Schools Research Ethics Committee, University of Sussex. Subsequently, a sufficiently large sample comprised 379 youths was recruited for this study. Of the total participating youths, 172 were British Muslim and 207 White British youths (aged between 18 and 21 years). The study was conducted online via the Qualtrics platform, and respondents were randomly allocated to conditions, resulting in half being in the experimental condition which involved an episode of vicarious intercultural contact designed to facilitate Integration endorsement through stories prepared and written by an expert story writer. Participants were required after reading each story to reflect on the interaction it narrated before they could move to the next stage in the study. Respondents in the Control condition read two short stories (one page each), made up of neutral content not connected to Muslim or White British cultures, and they were then required to answer reflection questions.
Youths in both conditions, were required to respond to similar post-test measures addressing intergroup attitudes including: the outgroup feeling thermometer, Intended contact behavioural intentions toward the outgroup, Importance of future contact with the outgroup, Intergroup anxiety, Intergroup emotions, Perceived ingroup/outgroup norms, and Inclusion of the others in the self (IOS).
All data analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS 25 and SAS 9.4 statistical software packages. A series of Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA), 2 Way ANOVAs, and Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) was carried out.
Study results showed that the vicarious contact intervention promoting integration significantly reduced respondents’ intergroup anxiety, and negative emotions, compared to the Control condition, and increased their scores on positive emotions, IOS, on the outgroup feeling thermometer, in their behavioural intentions toward the outgroup, and in the importance they placed on future contact with the outgroup. All of these intervention effects were only significant in the Muslim group and were moderate in size (Table 1) and no gender differences were observed. The intervention did not have any impact on White British youths’ intergroup attitude scores. In support of the conceptual model guiding the study, results showed that the intervention improved Muslim respondents’ outgroup thermometer scores, their behavioural intentions towards the outgroup, and the importance they place on future contact with the outgroup by reducing their negative emotions (and anxiety) and increasing their positive emotions towards the outgroup. The increase in respondents’ IOS attributed to the intervention also mediated the intervention effects on outgroup outcome measures.