Periodic Reporting for period 1 - GR-GATE (Scalable graphene-gated transistors)
Reporting period: 2018-03-01 to 2019-08-31
An alternative solution has been proposed by us, based on the concept of negative quantum capacitance (NQC) of graphene (G. Shi et al., Nano Lett. 14, 1739 (2014); P. Tsipas et al., Adv. Electron. Mater. 2, 1500297 (2016)) and other 2D materials (H. Choi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 203505 (2016)) as a result of electron correlation effects. The NQCFET featuring a graphene layer integrated in the gate of conventional Si MOSFETS, produces non-hysteretic characteristics and has good prospects for scaling. First results obtained in ERC AdG SMARTGATE have shown that NQCFET shows steeper slopes compared to control FETs. Our work in the POC GR-GATE project confirms our previous observations and provides evidence of subthermionic subthreshold slopes (<60 mV/dec) for graphene-gated transistors for a drive current range of more than 3 orders of magnitude. Based on these results an international patent application has been filed for the NQCFET. Technology valorization performed in collaboration with major European graphene technology organization shows that the main obstacle in high volume manufacturing of NQCFET is the Cu contamination due to wet transfer of graphene in the gate of transistors during FEOL processing, a contamination that cannot be sufficiently mitigated by Cu diffusion barriers such as Si3N4. Cu contamination is not compatible with Si CMOS processing so it is necessary to circumvent this problem. Using a dedicated processing line and tools could be an option which however increases cost. Using dry transfer methodologies could be another option which however raises concerns about the quality of the transferred graphene. Large area transfer based on roll-to-roll approach, wet and dry, has been manifested. However, this approach is compatible with transfer on flexible rather than rigid substrates, i.e. wafers [Appl. Phys. Rev. 5, 031105 (2018)].
Clearly, the possibility of high volume manufacturing of our NQCFET critically depends on the progress in the automization and Cu-free transfer process of graphene. In parallel, the NQCFET needs to demonstrate clear advantages with competing NC devices based on ferroelectric HfO2, preferably with the contribution of the wider research community including the research and development departments of key integrated device manufacturers. Once this is done, the next step for industrialization are as follows: i)Seek funding for NQCFET fabrication runs in an environment which is better suited for high quality wafer scale processing of such devices with respect to contamination, yield and other indicators for manufacturability; ii) Actively participate in the search for reliable and high quality wafer scale transfer of graphene as the main remaining obstacle towards industrialization of graphene in conventional electronic device applications; iii) Actively participate in the search for Cu-free and CMOS compatible substrates for graphene growth and/or direct growth of graphene on silicon/silica substrates; iv) Identify potential applications for those devices in the back-end of line and establish them there, e.g. by utilizing an European pilot line project as a first demonstrator; v) After demonstration of NQCFETs in a back-end of line application and the development of scalable transfer technology identify front-end of line applications for which the concept offers enough potential in terms of device performance that can justify additional fabrication costs coming with this concept.