Periodic Reporting for period 1 - ILBAB (The interoceptive link between anxiety and breathing perception)
Reporting period: 2018-06-01 to 2020-05-31
The body perceptions that were the focus of this project centred around breathing. Whilst altering and evaluating the internal state of our body is challenging, our breathing offers a viable pathway for accessing interoception. While anxiety is known to be related to altered perceptions of breathing, it is not yet known where in this perceptual model anxiety exerts its effect. Therefore, my research developed and utilised novel tasks that specifically measured a number of important aspects of breathing perception, including accuracy detecting small changes in breathing resistance, self-awareness and insight into interoceptive abilities, and how quickly an individual can learn about their breathing within a changing environment. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of the brain was also used in conjunction with a novel breathing learning task, to observe both how the brain dynamically adapts its perception of breathing and how this process may be impaired with anxiety. These rich datasets allowed us to apply state-of-the-art computational models to investigate what, where and how anxiety can interrupt the brain’s processing of internal bodily states.
In this project we found that significant disparities in breathing perceptions exist in individuals with different levels of anxiety. These disparities were apparent in subjective experiences (assessed with questionnaires), meta-cognitive evaluation (characterised with computational models of behavioural responses), and brain activity (measured with fMRI). These results now provide us with a rich characterisation and pointers towards potential mechanisms of how anxiety may change our body perceptions within a healthy population. Future projects that will directly follow on from this research will use this knowledge to investigate how these relationships may further change in individuals with clinically-significant levels of anxiety, and also how current treatments of anxiety (pharmacotherapy and exercise treatment) act on these body perceptions.
- Project planning, ethical approval and experimental setup.
- Development and open-access publication of two novel breathing tasks to measure different aspects of breathing-related interoception.
- Recruitment and measurement of 60 individuals, 30 of whom had very low levels of anxiety and 30 with moderate levels of anxiety. These groups were matched for both age and sex, with equal numbers of men and women in each group. Each participant completed two separate experimental sessions, one of which was conducted in conjunction with a magnetic resonance imaging scan at high field strength (7 Tesla).
- Planning and implementation of a novel analysis pipeline that combined multiple computational models.
- Ongoing preparation of a third manuscript that details the main results of the study.
- Dissemination and communication via public engagement activities, teaching and supervision of students, and academic publications.
- Successful application for research funding for projects that directly follow on from this work, allowing us to extend our current findings in healthy volunteers to clinical populations and longitudinal studies to better understand interventions for the treatment of anxiety.
The preliminary results from this project have demonstrated a host of differences in breathing and body perception amongst individuals with different levels of anxiety. Notably, people who have higher levels of anxiety have reduced sensitivity to small changes in their breathing, lower confidence in their perceptual decisions, lower self-reported awareness and positivity towards body symptoms, and altered brain activity when predicting upcoming breathing symptoms when they are compared to people with low levels of anxiety. A manuscript that details these results is currently in preparation, and we plan to make the data publicly available on an open-source platform for use in further scientific projects wherever possible.
Beyond the provision of novel methodology, the results of this project are the first to demonstrate both the dynamic brain activity associated with interoceptive-related predictions and errors, as well as the effect of anxiety on each of the interoceptive measures employed. The results of this project therefore provide an important step forward towards understanding both interoceptive processing and its relationship to psychiatric conditions such as anxiety. Furthermore, the implications of these results will extend beyond our scientific understanding by improving our medical knowledge of these alterations in body perceptions for both patients and physicians, considering the contribution of altered symptom perception towards mental health.