Skip to main content
Go to the home page of the European Commission (opens in new window)
English en
CORDIS - EU research results
CORDIS
Content archived on 2024-04-16

DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT OF GRASS HARVESTING SYSTEMS TO REDUCE SOIL COMPACTION, IMPROVE TRAFFICABILITY AND SLURRY DISPOSAL IN HIGH RAINFALL AREAS

Objective

In the higher rainfall areas of Europe, high yields of grass can be grown but there can be difficulties in conserving this for winter feed due to poor trafficability and soil compaction damage. In Ireland, for example, most grassland is grown in regions having rainfall of 800-1400 mm of which about 50 % falls in the forage harvesting period (May-October), so that soils can be quite moist and vulnerable to damage during the harvesting and transport operations.

The aims of the project include :

- improved harvesting and transport machinery,
- more efficient production and utilization of herbage and a reduction in nitrogen requirements,
- reduced soil structure damage and improved infiltration of slurry and water into soils.
In the higher rainfall areas of Europe high yields of grass can be grown but there can be difficulties in conserving this for winter feed where soils are moist and vulnerable to damage from machines during harvesting and transport. The aims are to improve harvesting and transport machinery, to achieve more efficient production of herbage, with a reduction in nitrogen requirements and to reduce damage to soil structure, thereby improving infiltration of slurry and water into soils.

In Ireland, field experiments were established at 2 sites. One with heavy textured, poorly drained, surface water grey soil and the other with clay/clay loam topsoil overlying a gravelly clay loam subsoil. Treatments simulating harvest traffic were applied to the plots and measurements were made of soil properties, herbage growth and quality. Where soil is moist, initial results suggest that the use of high ground pressure transport equipment for grass harvesting affects soil structure and can reduce crop yields substantially compared with low ground pressure equipment and zero traffic. In Scotland, a site was established on an imperfectly drained clay loam soil. A slurry taker was modified to give a track so that slurry could be applied without wheels making contact with the treatment area. Initial results suggest that soil compaction reduced the volume of soil macropores considerably and the rate of slurry infiltration was many times lower than on uncompacted soil. The uptake of nitrogen available in the slurry was greater in the uncompacted than in the compacted soil and first cut dry matter yields were up to 30% greater on the uncompacted plots.
The project will study existing harvesting systems and modify them and/or develop new harvesting/ transport systems aimed at reducing ground pressure, improving trafficability and limiting soil damage. Controlled traffic trials will be conducted at two locations to compare the conventional and novel low ground pressure systems for their effects on forage yield and quality, nitrogen utilization and soil structure. The effects of different degrees of soil compaction on water and slurry infiltration into soil will also be examined.

Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)

CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.

You need to log in or register to use this function

Topic(s)

Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.

Data not available

Call for proposal

Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.

Data not available

Funding Scheme

Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.

Data not available

Coordinator

TEAGASC (AGRICULTURE AND FOOD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY)
EU contribution
No data
Address
Sandymount Ave. 19
4 DUBLIN
Ireland

See on map

Total cost

The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.

No data

Participants (1)

My booklet 0 0