The report summarises key findings and provides an overview and comparative perspective of relevant governance, institutional and economic frameworks in China and Europe regarding UF-NBS at different levels, including the European (e.g. guidance on nature-based solutions, and on green infrastructure), national (e.g. the Forest City Construction Action in China), regional and city level. Particular attention will be paid to multi-level and networked governance dynamics in relation to urban de-velopment, and contextual differences concerning UF-NBS governance and implementation between coun-tries/regions in Europe and China.
This deliverable is the output of a review of knowledge on UF-NBS in China and Europe compiled by the CLEARING HOUSE consortium (see M1.3). The review will apply rapid review methods (Patnode et al. 2018), i.e. a structured interpretation and evaluation of the current knowledge used, to collate evidence on intended outcomes and unintended impacts of UF-NBS for urban ecosystem regeneration and human wellbeing. The review process will be done by a core group of project partners (UNIBA, HKU-SIRI, HUB, CAF-RIF, VUB, EFI, UniLodzki, LGI, CFRI, CREAF, LUKE).
This deliverable will report on the nove standardised Sino-European typology for Urban Forest-Based Solutions (UF-NBS). This deliverable is based on the work in task 1.1, which will identify, describe and map UF-NBS in European and Chinese cities. This analysis will also encompass new strategies (not necessarily implemented yet) in urban planning and green infrastructure, and urban tree and forestry design on both continents. The similarities and differences between UF-NBS initiatives will be identified, and major driving forces determining them in terms of social and economic factors will be mapped out. D1.1 will be fed into the Sino-European co-design event (M3.2, month 18) and the development of the analytical framework (T1.5).
The deliverable describes the methods, results and conclusions of the exploratory analysis of the case study cities and city clusters, and will be used as a base for developing the screening tool and the the interdisciplinary analytical framework for the project.
This deliverable describes the results of the local co-design workshops, including relevant questions for research from stakeholders' perspectives, and suggestions for the analytical framework development.
This report describes the results and outcomes of the activities selected in the first call for innovative knowledge of planning and managing UF-NBS for urban ecosystem restoration and rehabilitation.
The educational package will be developed for reaching out to school children (10-14 years) and teachers. This package will include adapted versions of the selected content delivered by the project. It will integrate with the citizen science module developed in WP3 and will collaborate with the social media efforts (particularly SnapChat, Instagram, and WeChat stories) to reach the target groups.
The guidance document will support the preparation and conduct of the workshops, including stakeholder analysis and selection. The document will be tested with some case study partner before finalisation and then be introduced to all case study partners via a webinar.
The screening tool will encompass analytical questions from all disciplines and assign responsible research partners for their analysis.
Searching for OpenAIRE data...
Author(s): Sebastian Scheuer, Dagmar Haase, Annegret Haase, Manuel Wolff, Thilo Wellmann
Published in: Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Issue 21/1, 2021, Page(s) 203-217, ISSN 1684-9981
Author(s): Corina Basnou, Joan Pino, Clive Davies, Georg Winkel, Rik De Vreese
Published in: Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, Issue 2, 2020, ISSN 2624-9634
Author(s): Thilo Wellmann, Angela Lausch, Erik Andersson, Sonja Knapp, Chiara Cortinovis, Jessica Jache, Sebastian Scheuer, Peleg Kremer, André Mascarenhas, Roland Kraemer, Annegret Haase, Franz Schug, Dagmar Haase
Published in: Landscape and Urban Planning, Issue 204, 2020, Page(s) 103921, ISSN 0169-2046
Author(s): Scarlet Richter, Dagmar Haase, Kolja Thestorf, Mohsen Makki
Published in: Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, Issue 54, 2020, Page(s) 126777, ISSN 1618-8667
Author(s): Maria Knaus, Dagmar Haase
Published in: Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, Issue 53, 2020, Page(s) 126738, ISSN 1618-8667
Author(s): Jakob Derks, Lukas Giessen, Georg Winkel
Published in: Forest Policy and Economics, Issue 118, 2020, Page(s) 102253, ISSN 1389-9341
Author(s): Maria Ignatieva, Dagmar Haase, Diana Dushkova, Annegret Haase
Published in: Land, Issue 9/3, 2020, Page(s) 73, ISSN 2073-445X