Periodic Reporting for period 1 - DLH (Disability benefits, labour force participation, and health: Evaluating the effect of social protection policies)
Reporting period: 2020-09-01 to 2022-08-31
In response, many governments have implemented reforms to curb the number of beneficiaries and expenditures on disability programs. This has been done by either tightening eligibility conditions to the different programs, or reducing the benefit amounts. One model for such policies in Europe is the Netherlands, which until the early 2000s was burdened by a substantially larger share of disability recipients than its European counterparts. A series of reforms implemented from 2004 onward sought to reduce government expenditures on disability benefits. The exemplary nature of the Dutch reforms provides an invaluable opportunity to better understand the impact of reducing benefit eligibility on a diverse set of policy relevant outcomes. In the first instance, this proposal will evaluate the causal relationship between disability benefits and labor force participation at the individual level. This will elucidate whether current trends are a direct consequence of the reforms or whether country level statistics are biased by other underlying trends or policies. While such reforms may have succeeded in reducing the number of benefit recipients, this proposal will also seek to evaluate in second instance whether tightening of benefit eligibility has an impact on individual level health. This is of great importance since protecting an individual’s health is a fundamental, yet often forgotten, explicit aim of these programs. The potential shift of financial burden from the social protection to the health system may in the end not be a desirable outcome from a societal perspective.
This project explores the role of disability programs in the Netherlands and disability in a worldwide context to understand how different programs, prevention strategies, or particular causes can be of greater relevance. This includes work on administrative records from the Netherlands but also exploiting studies and settings in other contexts.
For the second part of the study we leveraged individual variation in disability assessments to explore the allocation of disability benefits in the Netherlands. While the original purpose of the package was to explore the effect of disability benefits in the Netherlands, our findings concerning the allocation process raised other questions and deviated the research agenda to understand how allocation was being done and the potential welfare benefits. In general, we find selective allocation of disability benefits based on the applicants’ characteristics that deviate from the original intention of the program. Furthermore, variation in assessments are larger for low income individuals placing them at larger risks to not receive benefits although they might have been eligible with other assessors. The results from this part of the project have resulted in several presentations at local workshops including NETSPAR in the Netherlands and has produced a draft that is currently under submission.