Periodic Reporting for period 1 - INTEGRIN REGULATION (Functional analysis of the kinome and phosphatome as determinants of integrin phosphorylation in cancer)
Reporting period: 2019-08-01 to 2021-07-31
Given that the cytoplasmic domains of integrin adhesion receptors are essential hubs for protein-protein interactions, and that these domains are responsible for the cellular response to the extracellular environment, there remains a surprising lack in known regulators for integrin phosphorylation. Phosphorylation on specific residues is a reversible and highly dynamic process that can modulate the activity and protein-protein complex formation of many proteins within the cell. This process is bidirectionally regulated by kinases and phosphatases, which are themselves often druggable targets for targeted cancer therapies. As a proof-of-concept adhesion receptor, the fellow chose integrin beta1, as it is central to adhesion to the largest number of ECM ligands and there is experimental evidence for phosphorylation of this receptor on two tyrosine residues at the NPxY(783/795) sites within the cytoplasmic domain. Thus INTEGRIN REGULATION had three specific research objectives (SOs) that were focused on understanding the regulation and role of phosphorylation in the intracellular domains of integrin beta1.
SO1: Identification of novel regulatory kinases and/or phosphatases by unbiased screening approaches.
SO2: Confirmation of interactions using super-resolution imaging.
SO3: Functional assessment of identified kinases and/or phosphatases.
In SO2 we further validated the regulatory landscape of integrin beta1 phosphorylation by performing interaction screens using mass spectrometry (Bimolecular complementation affinity purification). This allowed us to identify the proteins that are recruited to the phosphorylated integrin complex, and we are currently investigating the role of this complex during cancer invasion; particularly for the formation of invadopodia, which are used by cancer cells as part of the invasive process to escape the primary tumour.
These mechanistic insights into integrin phosphorylation were then fed into SO3, which involves investigating the functional role of integrin phosphorylation during cancer progression. To this end, the fellow generated breast cancer cell lines with fluorescently-tagged integrin beta1, where the phosphorylatable tyrosine residues in the NPxY(783/795) sites were mutated to non-phosphorylatable phenylalanines (YYFF). Using these cell lines, we have shown that the cells expressing the YYFF non-phosphorylatable mutant integrin beta1 are defective in their ability to invade into three-dimensional (3D) organotypic matrices or to form invadopodia on fluorescent gelatin, suggesting that integrin phosphorylation dynamics are critical for efficient cancer cell invasion.
In order to maximise the impact of INTEGRIN REGULATION, the fellow has secured a further Academy of Finland postdoctoral fellowship to ensure that the work is published in a high impact journal that will reach the widest audience possible. This will ensure that the novel approaches and concepts applied in INTEGRIN REGULATION are fully disseminated and that the field can benefit from the findings. Currently, the fellow is evaluating the clinical relevance of the hits from the RNAi FRET screen, which will then be assessed by immunohistochemistry staining of large breast cancer cohorts, along with functional validation using combination therapies aimed at assessing the potential of inhibiting integrin beta1 phosphorylation as an anti-metastatic in breast cancer models. These aspects will provide an essential link from the mechanistic insights to improving patient outcomes from INTEGRIN REGULATION.