Objective
Legal theorists have long argued that law is more than enforcement, i.e. rather than being just an externally observed
phenomenon, that it involves a cognitive element on the part of participants in the practice. The dominant accounts of this
cognitive element divide into those—within the law and economics paradigm—that see it as a cost-benefit analysis and
others—in the natural law tradition—that conflate it with morality. Recent evidence suggests, however, that the picture is
more complex: neither are human beings as relentlessly self-interested as they are parodied to be as the homo economicus
of rational-choice theory nor do they possess unlimited altruism. But there has been very little systematic inquiry—certainly
of an empirical nature—into the question: what are the cognitive foundations of law— as a mode of cooperation—that make
it distinct from other institutions? This project will attempt to fill that gap by trying to understand the relationship between
decision-making at the individual level, group behaviour and social outcomes—focusing, in particular, on the role of trust and
the notion of community in mediating these relationships, and the point at which social norms “tip” into law. Joining the dots
between behavioural law and economics, moral psychology, legal theory and economic sociology, it will draw on the range
of methodologies currently in use in the American Empirical Legal Studies tradition (with a focus on behavioural techniques)
and extend current practice by developing an approach specifically adapted to legal scholarship. This ground breaking
research will seek to stretch the boundaries of current knowledge—in disciplinary, methodological and, ultimately,
theoretical terms— through pioneering approaches to the empirical study of law and thereby contribute to real world change
in the way that law and legal systems function, with implications for development, climate change, regional alliances and a
range of other key challenges.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- social sciences sociology
- social sciences economics and business economics
- social sciences psychology
- natural sciences earth and related environmental sciences atmospheric sciences climatology climatic changes
- social sciences law
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
H2020-EU.1.3. - EXCELLENT SCIENCE - Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme -
H2020-EU.1.3.2. - Nurturing excellence by means of cross-border and cross-sector mobility
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
MSCA-IF - Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowships (IF)
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) H2020-MSCA-IF-2018
See all projects funded under this callCoordinator
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
CB2 1TN CAMBRIDGE
United Kingdom
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.