Periodic Reporting for period 1 - AQUEA (Ancient aqueduct carbonate deposits as a high-resolution archive for the environment and archaeology)
Reporting period: 2021-10-11 to 2023-10-10
Ruins of ancient aqueducts can reveal much about their construction and functioning, but not about the way they were operated, and about the kind and amount of water flowing through them. However, many aqueducts deposited calcium carbonate sediments which can provide such information.
Calcium carbonate deposited in Roman aqueducts is a new, high-resolution archive for environmental and archaeological studies. Aqueduct carbonate stores information on short- and long-term variations in temperature, rainfall, vegetation cover and traces of earthquakes, droughts, floods, wildfires, and volcanic eruptions with up to daily resolution. Yet, aqueduct carbonate offers comprehensive anthropogenic information through its connection to settlements served by water supply systems in which the archive formed. This applies because the archive is forming at the heart of ancient cities and recording the environment and society. This originality of aqueduct carbonate provides the opportunity to study the historical past, human interference with the environment, human activity aspects such as ancient water management and the impact of environmental forcing, natural or self-inflicted, on society, in the middle of urbanism. Hence, during this action, we investigated the potential of the carbonate archive in three aqueduct carbonate series from neighbouring sites in Southern France.
Aqueduct carbonate was investigated using stable isotope, trace elements, spectrofluorescence and optical microscopic observations. This was done on number of sections of the aqueduct carbonate from different sites along each aqueduct, starting from spring and ending with the last sample at the end of the aqueduct, in the city. The reason for multi-km sampling was to see changes along the length of the aqueduct, mainly anthropogenic changes made due to cleaning or water withdrawal. For example, we discovered that for the aqueduct of Nîmes, thickness of the carbonate series was very variable, and that stratigraphy along the aqueduct varied in content. We could determine that this was because the aqueduct water was diverted for a water lifting machine for agricultural activities, while other stratigraphic variations were probably due to cleaning, leaving carbonate of different age in different parts of the structure. Such variations make interpretation more difficult, but also expand the total length of the archive available for study. The paper relevant to these conclusions is in progress and will be published in 2024.
In the course of this project, we published in Cahors where we interpreted periodic cleaning breaks and techniques and could address questions on the frequency of cleaning changed and how the aqueduct was abandoned. In the review paper, we summarized the state of the art on research of aqueduct carbonate, based on our experience and on previous papers on the subject, to give an overview to the reader and to a new generation students on the subject of ancient water management. Detailed interpretations were given by numerous authors in order to testify use of aqueduct carbonate in different aimed studies. The importance of the review is to bring public awareness to these new archives. The overall objective is to promote studies on aqueduct carbonates, in order to understand the history of water management.
I have organised a workshop where I presented the results for the first time during which I invited number of people doing the same aqueduct carbonate study. Beside the two-day workshop, I also disseminated this work with a press release. This gave the opportunity to meet with interested listeners in BBC and Jack FM in Oxford.