Periodic Reporting for period 1 - ACU-AHvE (Multiculturalism in the work of Aldo and Hannie van Eyck. Rethinking universalist notions in architecture.)
Période du rapport: 2021-02-01 au 2023-01-31
Specifically, it has focused on the work of the Dutch architects Aldo and Hannie van Eyck (1918-1999), who built their theoretical framework by merging modern architecture, prewar avant-garde and the artistic production of non-Western cultures. In order to do so, it was necessary to introduce a method that uses the Van Eyck family house as a starting point for the analysis. Inside their house, it still remains the Van Eycks’ full ethnographic and modern art collection, library, travel pictures, drawings and conference slides. The finding of the house constitutes a shifting point in the study of the Van Eycks’ thinking, a great amount of new information that this research disentangles and presents to a broader public.
Overall, the research scrutinises the blending of anthropology, non-western and modern art in Aldo and Hannie van Eyck’s work in a novel way where space, inhabitants, political ideas and ways of living merge to shape a multiculturalist notion of society and architecture. The analysis of the new information casts new understandings on Van Eyck’s oeuvre and the development of a multiculturalist world-view that catalysed the transformation of European Post-War architecture, an example of open and inclusive design practices, respectful of social context and embracing differences and identity, thus of utmost academic value for society and illuminating the historical background and dynamics of current debates.
The case-tudy part of the research involved extensive visits to the field to create complete catalogue of the Van Eyck Collection; numerous interviews to the Van Eyck family, colleagues, art dealers, and art collectors; digitisation of Van Eyck lectures on ethnographic art, travel films and images. In short, the application of the learnt methods, leading to several conference contributions (D9.1 D9.3) a book chapter on Van Eyck and Bo Bardi's engagement with non-Western cultures (D9.4) invited lectures on Lucerne University of Applied Sciences, and Politecnico Milano, and a journal publication at The Journal of Architecture (D9.2). I've also communicated my results to the general public on a public event held at Matadero Madrid (10.3).
In 2021, I participated as an Invited Lecturer at FAD Universidad Finis Terrae (Chile), teaching an online series (14 sessions) that explores the anthropologisation of architectural discourse and that was uploaded to Youtube (D10.1) with over 50k views. I've also collaborated with De-Colonial Scholars on an on-going projects (Special Number for the Architecture and Culture Scientific Journal), and developed several scientific publications on a postcolonial revisit of the Van Eyck Collection, currently under review (D9.6). We are currently re-working the found materials for an exhibition at the Het Nieuwe Instituut, revisiting the Van Eyck Collection from today's perspective (D10.5)
This research has proven that their roles as collectors, tourists and “ethnographers” need to be taken into consideration, that their contribution to the field of architecture becomes unreadable without a proper and critical look at their engagement with cultures other than their own. Ultimately, art collecting was an activity extensively performed by the Van Eycks from the 40s, leading to the unfolding of an extensive network of actors —art dealers, art galleries, museums, collectors, artists— and ideas —universalism, multiculturalism, primitivism— that made a long-lasting impact on their architectural thinking and, beyond, on international post-war architectural discourse.
The research has also approached Van Eyck Collection from a post-colonial perspective, via an analysis of the processes of Othering that were at play. This has shown that, while the Van Eycks' engagement with non-Western cultures might initially be seen as a positive “learning-from” endeavour, it also undoubtedly had many problematic elements. The research thus introduces a de-colonial/post-colonial lens that helps unravel the processes and problematics of the anthropologisation of post-war architectural discourses, finding guiding principles that are of utmost societal implication in our globalised societies and economies, where questions of restitution and epistemic de-colonisation are in the spotlight.