Objective
For improving the efficiency of new and existing transport aircraft for higher Mach numbers (M = 0.8+) the installation of ducted propfans can play a major role in the future. Preliminary limited investigations in national and international programmes have shown promising results. To maintain the European position in the future, more detailed investigations on a large complete model with powered engine simulation are necessary.
This project investigated the aerodynamic engine/airframe interference effects in the context of the new class of ducted propfan engines. The program makes use of an existing wind tunnel model and 2 model engine simulators one ducted propfan and one turbofan. The equipment was completed by designing and manufacturing a second simulator for each engine type. In the wind tunnel program 2 configurations are investigated:
model without engines;
model with 2 turbofans.
The test program covers force distribution measurements and pressure distribution measurements for different Mach numbers, incidence and sideslip settings. Further on, the engine power setting was varied.
To get detailed information about the interference effects the flow field was analyzed using the wing pressure distribution in the vicinity of the engine. In all cases the installation of the engine leads to a significant reduction of the wing leading edge suction peak and to an increase in pressure over the whole span. On the lower surface, the interference effects for this type of engine are small.
The following theoretical calculations were performed:
use of an existing Euler code for investigations of interference effects of agreed test conditions;
coupling of the grid generation procedure and the Euler code with a viscous jet model;
application of a postprocessing technique on the existing experimental data and theoretical results.
In all cases the engine installation leads to a significant reduction in wing leading edge suction peak and increasing pressure on the wing upper surface. This result is in very good agreement with the experimental results. A direct comparison of experiment and calculation of the wing pressure distribution for the model with the turbofan engine is in good agreement for all sections. That means, the solution of the Euler equations accurately models the interference phenomena in this particular low speed case.
The project is based on an existing complete wind tunnel model owned by DLR. Together with the model 2 simulators plus instrumentation, cowlings and pylons exist, ie, one simulator for ducted propfans (DLR) and one simulator for conventional turbofan (DA). The model has a span of approximately 3.5 m and is equipped with a modern wing design for a transport aircraft. The wing has 9 sections of static pressure ports and is available in clean and high-lift configurations. The model will be completed with 2 further simulators (one ducted propfan, one turbofan), including instrumentation, cowlings and pylons.
With the complete model a first test series in DNW is planned. The investigations will lead to:
Analysis of installation effects of a ducted counter rotation propfan in relation to a conventional turbofan, concerning low speed interference in combination with unsymmetrical power settings and sideslip angles.
Experience concerning the behaviour of ducted propfans installed on an airframe.
Provision of test data for comparison with theoretical calculations, thus improving the flow of information between theory and experiment as well as between industry and research institutes.
The theoretical work done in parallel will improve the calculation methods of the complex wing/pylon/nacelle structure covering the influence of a jet flowfield. Additionally, the results of the calculations will be used to support the test campaign and provide a deeper understanding of interference effects, while the test results will provide a validation basis for the calculations. In the test series, envisaged at the end of the project, effects of single rotation propfan and high performances are to be investigated.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- engineering and technology mechanical engineering vehicle engineering aerospace engineering aircraft
- natural sciences mathematics applied mathematics mathematical model
You need to log in or register to use this function
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Data not available
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Data not available
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Coordinator
81611 München
Germany
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.