Objective
When IVF in conjunction with embryo transfer became feasible in the late 70ies there was a heated dispute about principles. This dispute subsided very much when IVF came to be a standardized infertility therapy. But now and then sensational news attracts attention (surrogate motherhood after the mother died, artificial insemination after the menopause). The proposed project, however, shall be concerned neither with the routine nor with the extremes.
Rather, experiences with IVF shall be reviewed and analysed with regard to certain ethical questions. In particular, we are working towards an ethical evaluation of the psychosocial consequences and of the medical success rates of this technology. These aspects are the basis for counselling before and after IVF is applied. Further more, fundamental issues in social ethics are at stake which the discussion until now has stated but not investigated thoroughly enough. An example is the problem of a right to a child of one's own and of the technology-assisted satisfaction of such a presumptive claim.
This project shall focus on the connecting lines between IVF and genetic diagnosis and therapy. The objective is to discuss preimplantation genetic diagnosis as an alternative to the available procedures in prenatal diagnosis as well as to the possibilities of gene therapy.
This new discussion is a research desideratum. The application of IVF might change fundamentally if it were no longer indicated only for infertility treatment but also in order to detect and avoid hereditary handicaps. The ethical key question here is whether eugenic goals can be sufficiently excluded. This discussion requires a comparative review of the ethical debates and of the legal regulations in different countries. The experience available and the future developments to be expected in the context of applied IVF shall be reviewed comprehensively.
The possible conflicts of interest shall be clearly presented and assessed, and the different national and professional perspectives will be compared. Thus, the project will contribute to the purpose of establishing a European consensus
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- medical and health sciences clinical medicine gynaecology reproductive medicine
- medical and health sciences medical biotechnology genetic engineering gene therapy
- medical and health sciences clinical medicine obstetrics fetal medicine
- medical and health sciences clinical medicine embryology
You need to log in or register to use this function
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Data not available
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Coordinator
72074 Tübingen
Germany
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.